[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1772412] Re: zfs 0.7.9 fixes a bug (https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/7343) that hangs the system completely

2019-04-03 Thread Richard Laager
Your upgrade is done, but for the record, installing the HWE kernel doesn't remove the old kernel. So you still have the option to go back to that in the GRUB menu. Also, once you're sure the HWE kernel is working, you'll probably want to remove the linux-image-generic package so you're not

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1772412] Re: zfs 0.7.9 fixes a bug (https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/7343) that hangs the system completely

2019-04-02 Thread Richard Laager
ZFS 0.7.9 was released in Cosmic (18.10). You could update to Cosmic. Alternatively, on 18.04, you can install the HWE kernel package: linux- image-generic-hwe-18.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1802481] Re: cryptsetup waits for zvol /dev/zvol/rpool/swap with no zpool imported during boot. Timing problem?

2018-12-13 Thread Richard Laager
I really don’t know what to suggest here. As you mentioned, this used to work. If you are only using LUKS for swap, maybe you could just remove it from crypttab and run the appropriate commands manually in rc.local or a custom systemd unit. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1802481] Re: cryptsetup waits for zvol /dev/zvol/rpool/swap with no zpool imported during boot. Timing problem?

2018-12-10 Thread Richard Laager
If the pool is on top of LUKS (a relatively common configuration when ZFS and cryptsetup are both being used), then you'd need cryptsetup first. My advice is that you should either stop encrypting swap or start encrypting the whole pool. Hopefully in another (Ubuntu) release or two, we'll have

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1802481] Re: cryptsetup waits for zvol /dev/zvol/rpool/swap with no zpool imported during boot. Timing problem?

2018-12-07 Thread Richard Laager
Try adding initramfs as an option in /etc/crypttab. That's the approach I use when putting the whole pool on a LUKS device, and is necessary due to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/1612906 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1791143] Re: Suggestion to make zfsutils-linux a snap

2018-09-06 Thread Richard Laager
Is there something inherent in snaps that makes this easier or better than debs? For example, do snaps support multiple installable versions of the same package name? If snaps aren’t inherently better, the same thing could be done with debs using the usual convention for having multiple versions

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1602409] Re: Ubuntu 16.04 Should package zfs-auto-snapshot

2018-08-01 Thread Richard Laager
I don't have permissions to change this, but my recommendation would be to set this as "Won't Fix". It's my understanding that zfs-auto-snapshot is more-or-less unmaintained upstream. I know I've seen recommendations to switch to something else (e.g. sanoid) on issues there. -- You received this

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1738259] Re: need to ensure microcode updates are available to all bare-metal installs of Ubuntu

2018-06-12 Thread Richard Laager
@sdeziel, I agree 100%. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738259 Title: need to ensure microcode updates are available to all bare-metal installs of Ubuntu Status

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1738259] Re: need to ensure microcode updates are available to all bare-metal installs of Ubuntu

2018-06-06 Thread Richard Laager
This is particularly annoying for me too. All of my virtual machines use linux-image-generic because I need linux- image-extra to get the i6300esb watchdog driver for the KVM watchdog. This change forces the amd64-microcode and intel-microcode packages to be installed on all of my VMs. -- You

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1688890] Re: initramfs-zfs should support misc /dev dirs

2018-04-16 Thread Richard Laager
I haven't had a chance to write and test the zpool.cache copying. I keep meaning to get to it every day, but pushing it back for lack of time. The zfs-initramfs script in 16.04 (always) and in 18.04 (by default) runs a plain `zpool import`. ZoL 0.7.5 has a default search order for imports that

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1600060] Re: ZFS "partially filled holes lose birth time"

2018-03-17 Thread Richard Laager
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1600060 Title: ZFS "partially filled holes lose birth time"

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1685528] Re: ZFS initramfs mounts dataset explicitly set not to be mounted, causing boot process to fail

2018-03-17 Thread Richard Laager
I fixed this upstream, which was released in 0.7.4. Bionic has 0.7.5. ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1688890] Re: initramfs-zfs should support misc /dev dirs

2018-03-17 Thread Richard Laager
I need to do some testing, but we might want to consider using the cache file. An approach (suggested to my by ryao, I think) was that we first import the root pool read-only, copy the cache file out of it, export the pool, and then import the pool read-write using the cache file. -- You

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1741081] Re: zfs-import-cache.service fails on startup

2018-03-12 Thread Richard Laager
I updated to the version from -proposed and rebooted. I verified that no units failed on startup. ** Tags added: verification-done-artful -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1741081] Re: zfs-import-cache.service fails on startup

2018-03-02 Thread Richard Laager
zfs-load-module.service seems to have a Requires on itself? That has to be wrong. Also, zfs-import-cache.service and zfs-import-scan.service need an After =zfs-load-module.service. They're not getting one automatically because of DefaultDependencies=no (which seems appropriate here, so leave that

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1751671] Re: zfs in bionic (0.7.5) is missing encryption support

2018-02-25 Thread Richard Laager
Native encryption was merged to master but has not been released in a tagged version. There are actually a couple of issues that will result in on-disk format changes. It should be the major feature for the 0.8.0 release. ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1734172] Re: Upgrade ZFS to 0.7.3

2018-01-29 Thread Richard Laager
16.04's HWE's updates will top out at the kernel version shipped in 18.04. I assume this is because you can then just use 18.04. See: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/RollingLTSEnablementStack as linked from: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack -- You received this bug notification

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1741081] [NEW] zfs-import-cache.service fails on startup

2018-01-03 Thread Richard Laager
Public bug reported: I just noticed on my test VM of artful that zfs-import-cache.service does not have a ConditionPathExists=/etc/zfs/zpool.cache. Because of that, it fails on startup, since the cache file does not exist. This line is being deleted by

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1734172] Re: Upgrade ZFS to 0.7.3

2017-11-23 Thread Richard Laager
I have a related question... as far as I'm aware, the ZoL kernel<->userspace interface is still not versioned: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/1290 Effectively, this means that the version of zfsutils-linux must always match the version of the kernel modules. What is the plan to handle

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1731735] Re: zfs scrub starts on all pools simultaneously

2017-11-12 Thread Richard Laager
ZFS already limits the amount of IO that a scrub can do. Putting multiple pools on the same disk defeats ZFS's IO scheduler.* Scrubs are just one example of the performance problems that will cause. I don't think we should complicate the scrub script to accommodate this scenario. My suggestion is

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1731735] Re: zfs scrub starts on all pools simultaneously

2017-11-12 Thread Richard Laager
Why do you have multiple pools on the same disks? That's very much not a best practice or even typical ZFS installation. ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1550301] Re: ZFS: Set elevator=noop on disks in the root pool

2017-11-01 Thread Richard Laager
I submitted a fix upstream: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/6807/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550301 Title: ZFS: Set elevator=noop on disks in the root

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1685528] Re: ZFS initramfs mounts dataset explicitly set not to be mounted, causing boot process to fail

2017-11-01 Thread Richard Laager
samvde, can you provide your `zfs list` output? The script seems designed to only import filesystems *below* the filesystem that is the root filesystem. In the typical case, the root filesystem is something like rpool/ROOT/ubuntu. There typically shouldn't be children of rpool/ROOT/ubuntu. --

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1685528] Re: ZFS initramfs mounts dataset explicitly set not to be mounted, causing boot process to fail

2017-07-06 Thread Richard Laager
Copying the script is probably fine for now. I still intend to look at this, hopefully in the next month or so. It's been relatively low on my list, since LTS releases are my main priority. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1694090] Re: ZoL: wrong import order prevents boot

2017-05-29 Thread Richard Laager
The output only shows the results, not the order of mount attempts. It may be the case that there is an ordering bug here. But we need to rule out the other case first. It could easily be the case that the directory is non-empty, so the /var/share mount failed even though it was properly attempted

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1694090] Re: ZoL: wrong import order prevents boot

2017-05-27 Thread Richard Laager
This is the problem: '/var/share': directory is not empty Figure out what is in there and deal with this appropriately. I don't personally love that ZFS refuses to mount on non-empty directories, but most of the time, the fact that the directory is non- empty is the real problem. ** Changed in:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1687664] Re: grub-probe zfs bug: failed to get canonical path

2017-05-19 Thread Richard Laager
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1527727 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527727 This is a duplicate of 1527727. It has been fixed in 16.10 and newer, but has not been backported to 16.04. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1527727 grub-probe for zfs assumes all devices

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1685528] Re: ZFS initramfs mounts dataset explicitly set not to be mounted, causing boot process to fail

2017-05-16 Thread Richard Laager
I suspect that wouldn't work, for one reason or another. The upstream one has more features, probably. I'd rather just keep this Debian-specific. The initramfs script is likely to have distro specific code. I don't see the idea of one unified script working out well. -- You received this bug

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1577057] Re: zfs initrd script fails when rootdelay boot option is set

2017-05-15 Thread Richard Laager
This has presumably regressed in 17.04 as they replaced the initrd code (somewhat by accident). I'm going to review all this stuff and get some fixes in soon, so it should be re-fixed by the next LTS. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1685528] Re: [Pkg-zfsonlinux-devel] zfs-initramfs Script Change

2017-04-23 Thread Richard Laager
On 04/24/2017 12:02 AM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Richard Laager] >> Who completely replaced the zfs-initramfs script? > > You can find out who commited what in the Debian package by looking in > the package maintenance git repository available from > http://anonscm.deb

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1550301] Re: ZFS: Set elevator=noop on disks in the root pool

2017-04-23 Thread Richard Laager
** Tags removed: patch ** Tags added: regression-release zesty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550301 Title: ZFS: Set elevator=noop on disks in the root pool Status

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1685528] Re: ZFS initramfs mounts dataset explicitly set not to be mounted, causing boot process to fail

2017-04-23 Thread Richard Laager
** Tags added: regression-release -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1685528 Title: ZFS initramfs mounts dataset explicitly set not to be mounted, causing boot process

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1685528] Re: ZFS initramfs mounts dataset explicitly set not to be mounted, causing boot process to fail

2017-04-23 Thread Richard Laager
On 04/22/2017 12:36 PM, Sam Van den Eynde wrote: > Experienced this with Ubuntu Zesty. Xenial seems to ship with a > different zfs script for the initrd. Who completely replaced the zfs-initramfs script? Was there a particular reason for this massive change, and was it discussed anywhere? This

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1550301] Re: ZFS: Set elevator=noop on disks in the root pool

2017-04-23 Thread Richard Laager
This has regressed in Zesty, because someone replaced the zfs-initramfs script. ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1677073] Re: ZFS pools are unstable after round of updates

2017-03-29 Thread Richard Laager
They are available at: http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/xenial/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1677073 Title: ZFS pools are unstable after round of updates

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1677073] Re: ZFS pools are unstable after round of updates

2017-03-28 Thread Richard Laager
I don't have too much to suggest, but if you think this was caused by an upgrade, I'd be curious to see which packages (and versions) /var/log/dpkg.log shows were upgraded. But unfortunately, it sounds like you have already reinstalled. One thing you might try to is to reinstall (using an

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1673197] Re: Upgrading zfs-initramfs breaks booting from a zfs root

2017-03-17 Thread Richard Laager
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/conf.d/zfs has disappeared from the package in zesty. That is the cause of this regression. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673197 Title:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1635115] Re: grub fails zfs root filesystem detection due to failed checksum

2016-10-20 Thread Richard Laager
In case it's related, can you confirm the kernel version you are using now, and the kernel version from before the upgrade? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1635115

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1624540] Re: please have lxd recommend zfs

2016-10-14 Thread Richard Laager
The pools are imported by either zfs-import-scan.service or zfs-import- cache.service. (Which service runs depends on whether /etc/zfs/zpool.cache exists.) They both call `zpool import -a` plus some other arguments. In other words, `zpool import -a` is being run unconditionally, whether pools

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1588632] Re: Please upgrade to zfs 0.6.5.7

2016-10-10 Thread Richard Laager
@tomposmiko, the official way is to 1) file a bug report, 2) get that fixed in the current development branch, and then 3) follow the SRU (stable release update) process to get it backported into the LTS release. The hole birth thing is a mess, and I've got bug #1600060 open for that in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1600060] Re: ZFS "partially filled holes lose birth time"

2016-10-10 Thread Richard Laager
And also: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/4996 fix pending here: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/5061 Debian is shipping a patch to add an ignore_hole_birth tunable (and defaulting to on). We should get that in Ubuntu, except that we also want to rename it as per here:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1628279] Re: python utilities script suffix (.py) should be removed as per Policy 10.4

2016-10-05 Thread Richard Laager
This is installing the files using the old names, and symlinking using the new ones. Is that intentional? I expected it would install using the new names and symlinks for the old ones. ** Tags removed: verification-done ** Tags added: verification-needed -- You received this bug notification

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-10-05 Thread Richard Laager
Does ZFS actually have any translations? There are no .po files in the source and no .mo files in the binary package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607920 Title:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1630231] Re: /etc/hostid is not set after installing zfs

2016-10-05 Thread Richard Laager
This isn't a huge problem. The decision to not depend on spl was intentional, to avoid dragging spl into main. There's been some discussion on pkg-zfsonlinux-devel about how to handle hostid in Debian, which will likely be inherited by Ubuntu. If Debian's solution lands in spl instead of

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1624540] Re: please have lxd recommend zfs

2016-10-03 Thread Richard Laager
@pitti, the ID_FS_TYPE is zfs_member, not zfs. The service is, as you listed, zed.service. Modifying your rule then is: ACTION!="remove", SUBSYSTEM=="block", ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=="zfs_member", ENV{SYSTEMD_WANTS}+="zed.service" However, if zed.service is going to exit if there is no pool imported,

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1624540] Re: please have lxd recommend zfs

2016-10-03 Thread Richard Laager
The ZFS module is loaded automatically by zpool-import-scan/zpool- import-cache. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624540 Title: please have lxd recommend zfs Status

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1628553] Re: Ubuntu 16.04.1 Install zfsutils-linux Panic Error, endless loop

2016-10-03 Thread Richard Laager
Try loading the ZFS module with zfs_recover=1, and then try a read-only import. rmmod zfs modprobe zfs zfs_recover=1 zpool import -o readonly -f -R /mnt POOL If it imports, at least then you can see how your data looks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1628553] Re: Ubuntu 16.04.1 Install zfsutils-linux Panic Error, endless loop

2016-10-03 Thread Richard Laager
That should be "-o readonly=on". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628553 Title: Ubuntu 16.04.1 Install zfsutils-linux Panic Error, endless loop Status in zfs-linux

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1565415] Re: zfs-dkms 0.6.5.6-0ubuntu4: zfs kernel module failed to build

2016-10-03 Thread Richard Laager
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1574069 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574069 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1574069 zfs dkms kernel module failed to build -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1596835] Re: libnvpair.so.1 should be in /lib/, not /usr/lib/

2016-10-03 Thread Richard Laager
FWIW, these are fixed in Debian. So hopefully we'll see this fix in Ubuntu 17.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1596835 Title: libnvpair.so.1 should be in /lib/,

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1589814] Re: zfs-dkms 0.6.5.6-0ubuntu9: zfs kernel module failed to build

2016-10-03 Thread Richard Laager
This is clearly a bug, but 15.10 is EOL now. In 16.04+, the module is pre-built, so there is no more DKMS building. ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1624540] Re: please have lxd recommend zfs

2016-10-03 Thread Richard Laager
It is important that zed run in all cases where a pool (with real disks) exists. This will only get more important over time, as the fault management code is improved. (Intel is actively working on this.) It seems reasonable to not start zed in a container, though. For the second piece, only

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1628553] Re: Ubuntu 16.04.1 Install zfsutils-linux Panic Error, endless loop

2016-09-30 Thread Richard Laager
For the record, this is also posted upstream: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/5173 ** Bug watch added: Github Issue Tracker for ZFS #5173 https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/5173 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1628279] Re: python utilities script suffix (.py) should be removed as per Policy 10.4

2016-09-30 Thread Richard Laager
Once this is in Yakkety, I think we should SRU it to Xenial. The sooner we change this, the less likelihood we have people relying on the old names (with .py) of these utilities. @kirkland, it'd be really nice to address this before ZFS lands in the default Server Seed for 16.04. -- You

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1628553] Re: Ubuntu 16.04.1 Install zfsutils-linux Panic Error, endless loop

2016-09-30 Thread Richard Laager
If you have a separate boot drive, you should be able to install zfsutils-linux. Worst case, disconnect the ZFS drives. If necessary, disable the zfs-import-scan and zfs-import-cache services. You should reach a point where you can boot, and zfsutils-linux is installed, and the ZFS drives are

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1628279] Re: python utilities script suffix (.py) should be removed as per Policy 10.4

2016-09-29 Thread Richard Laager
The previous patch was here: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/275709492/zfs-fix-filenames.debdiff It probably still applies cleanly (aside for the changelog). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1628553] Re: Ubuntu 16.04.1 Install zfsutils-linux Panic Error, endless loop

2016-09-29 Thread Richard Laager
I think I got the numbers right, but in any case, this is the gist of the error: PANIC: blkptr at 88040b993640 DVA 1 has invalid OFFSET 36830022909049856 What was the last version of ZFS-on-Linux (that you were using) that works? Was that the only version of ZFS you had ever used? Can you

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1627909] Re: [SRU] zfs-linux should be using python3 for python userspace tools

2016-09-29 Thread Richard Laager
I tested 0.6.5.6-0ubuntu13 on a Xenial system with no python2 installed; only python3. I did this by first upgrading the ZFS packages and then purging the python2 packages. All three scripts work as expected. I did a basic run of each with no arguments. For the record, in case anyone has this

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1628279] Re: python utilities script suffix (.py) should be removed as per Policy 10.4

2016-09-27 Thread Richard Laager
I just talked to Brian Behlendorf (since I'm sitting next to him at the OpenZFS Developer Summit). He doesn't have strong feelings either way, but is concerned about breaking people who are already relying on those names. My thought is we should just fix it in Debian/Ubuntu regardless of whether

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1627909] Re: zfs-linux should be using python3 for python userspace tools

2016-09-26 Thread Richard Laager
As we discussed, this should just be a matter of changing the package dependency. The actual scripts support Python 3. This assumes that the python3 package is using the alternatives system such that /usr/bin/python will still exist on a python3-only system. -- You received this bug

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-09-26 Thread Richard Laager
The fix was merged upstream here: https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/792517389fad5c495a2738b61c2e9c65dedaaa9a -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607920 Title: zfs

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1624844] Re: Ubuntu 16.04 breaks boot with wrong zpool.cache

2016-09-20 Thread Richard Laager
If this is a non-root pool which is not available at boot, then you should do this: sudo zpool set cachefile=none POOL That will inhibit the creation of a zpool.cache file for that pool. The other option, if this is always plugged in, would be to configure it to unlock automatically on boot.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1624844] Re: Ubuntu 16.04 breaks boot with wrong zpool.cache

2016-09-20 Thread Richard Laager
You are not booting off ZFS? You no longer have a copy of the zpool.cache from when the problem occurred? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624844 Title: Ubuntu 16.04

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1588632] Re: Please upgrade to zfs 0.6.5.7

2016-09-16 Thread Richard Laager
I verified that linux-image-4.4.0-9136-generic in Yakkety still has 0.6.5.6. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1620898] Re: 0.6.5.6 outdated. Latest version of ZoL on OpenZFS site is 0.6.5.7.

2016-09-07 Thread Richard Laager
Yakkety has 0.6.5.7. If you're asking about Xenial, you should read up on Ubuntu's SRU process. ** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1177507] Re: per route mtu settings are broken in linux kernel 3.2

2016-08-25 Thread Richard Laager
First, let me say I'm not an Ubuntu developer. Second, is this still a problem for you? On a system running Precise, this seems to work for me: Linux yak 3.2.0-107-generic #148-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jul 18 20:22:08 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1527727] Re: grub-probe for zfs assumes all devices prefix with /dev, ignoring /dev/disk/...

2016-08-20 Thread Richard Laager
Colin, with grub2 in yakkety being patched, we should be ready for zfsutils-linux in yakkety to drop /lib/udev/rules.d/69-vdev.rules and "Conflicts: grub2 << 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu5". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1527727] Re: grub-probe for zfs assumes all devices prefix with /dev, ignoring /dev/disk/...

2016-08-20 Thread Richard Laager
[My previous comment was incorrect. I had the wrong file in the wrong package.] Colin, with grub2 in yakkety being patched, we should be ready for zfs- initramfs in yakkety to drop /lib/udev/rules.d/60-zpool.rules and "Conflicts: grub2 << 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu5". -- You received this bug

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1614859] Re: zfsutils-linux fails to configure "directory not empty"

2016-08-19 Thread Richard Laager
I've marked it as Invalid, as there's nothing to be done at this point. But, there may still be some bug here. After all, how did this happen in the first place? That may have been user error, or it may not have. But, at this point, it likely doesn't matter. If we see more, similar reports, or if

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1614859] Re: zfsutils-linux fails to configure "directory not empty"

2016-08-19 Thread Richard Laager
It's not mounted correctly, though. Note that, in the mount output, there is no "storage/media on /storage/media". Do this: sudo zfs umount storage/media/anime sudo zfs umount storage/media/comedy sudo zfs umount storage/media/comics sudo zfs umount storage/media/documentaries sudo zfs umount

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1614859] Re: zfsutils-linux fails to configure "directory not empty"

2016-08-19 Thread Richard Laager
Can you share the output of `zfs list` and `mount` (when everything is mounted properly)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614859 Title: zfsutils-linux fails to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1548009] Re: ZFS pools should be automatically scrubbed

2016-08-14 Thread Richard Laager
This works for me "in the wild" (i.e. waiting until today, which was the second Sunday of the month). I had two servers, one with 0.6.5.6-0ubuntu11 and one with 0.6.5.6-0ubuntu12. ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages,

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1527727] Re: grub-probe for zfs assumes all devices prefix with /dev, ignoring /dev/disk/...

2016-08-12 Thread Richard Laager
cyphermox: Any progress? It's been three months since your last comment where it was close to ready. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527727 Title: grub-probe for zfs

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1548009] Re: ZFS pools should be automatically scrubbed

2016-08-01 Thread Richard Laager
This works for me, using the first test case. If this feels good enough, feel free to change the tag yourself. Otherwise, I'll do so after verifying the unmodified cron configuration works on the 14th. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1607920] Re: zfs services fail on firstboot if zfs-utils is integrated into the deployment image

2016-07-29 Thread Richard Laager
chiluk is looking to work on this for upstream. I might jump in too. https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/4680 ** Bug watch added: Github Issue Tracker for ZFS #4680 https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/4680 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1574342] Re: Ship arcstat.py and arc_summary.py with zfsutils-linux

2016-07-29 Thread Richard Laager
Sure, but ZoL is not bound by Ubuntu Policy. Ubuntu is. That said, I'll suggest they be fixed upstream too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574342 Title: Ship

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1574342] Re: Ship arcstat.py and arc_summary.py with zfsutils-linux

2016-07-29 Thread Richard Laager
I've attached a .debdiff to fix the filenames to comply with Policy 10.4, as @adconrad and I mentioned. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574342 Title: Ship arcstat.py

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1574342] Re: Ship arcstat.py and arc_summary.py with zfsutils-linux

2016-07-29 Thread Richard Laager
** Patch added: "zfs-fix-filenames.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1574342/+attachment/4709820/+files/zfs-fix-filenames.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1548009] Re: ZFS pools should be automatically scrubbed

2016-07-29 Thread Richard Laager
Also note that this is the exact PATH from /etc/crontab, which is thus also the PATH under which /etc/cron.{hourly,daily,weekly,monthly} run. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1548009] Re: ZFS pools should be automatically scrubbed

2016-07-27 Thread Richard Laager
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + Xenial shipped with a cron job to automatically scrub ZFS pools, as + desired by many users and as implemented by mdadm for traditional Linux + software RAID. Unfortunately, this cron job does not work, because it needs a PATH line for /sbin, where the

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1574342] Re: Ship arcstat.py and arc_summary.py with zfsutils-linux

2016-07-27 Thread Richard Laager
@slashd, did Debian drop the .py extensions per Policy? Did they write man pages? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574342 Title: Ship arcstat.py and arc_summary.py

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1600060] Re: ZFS "partially filled holes lose birth time"

2016-07-11 Thread Richard Laager
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #830824 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830824 ** Also affects: zfs-linux (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830824 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1548009] Re: ZFS pools should be automatically scrubbed

2016-07-10 Thread Richard Laager
I can confirm that the .debdiff I attached in comment #11 fixes the problem. My system ran the scrub today. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1548009 Title: ZFS pools

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1600579] Re: zfsutils-linux scrub cron job fails

2016-07-10 Thread Richard Laager
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1548009 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1548009 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1548009 ZFS pools should be automatically scrubbed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1600060] Re: ZFS "partially filled holes lose birth time"

2016-07-07 Thread Richard Laager
** Description changed: Note: This is different from Launchpad bug #1557151. This is another, similar, bug. - This is a very unfortunate bug because the fix only helps you moving - forward. - Bug description from Matt Ahrens at OpenZFS: "If a ZFS object contains a hole at level one,

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1600060] [NEW] ZFS "partially filled holes lose birth time"

2016-07-07 Thread Richard Laager
Public bug reported: Note: This is different from Launchpad bug #1557151. This is another, similar, bug. Bug description from Matt Ahrens at OpenZFS: "If a ZFS object contains a hole at level one, and then a data block is  created at level 0 underneath that l1 block, l0 holes will be created.  

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1548009] Re: [FFe] ZFS pools should be automatically scrubbed

2016-07-06 Thread Richard Laager
It turns out this isn't actually working. The problem is the PATH in cron, which does not include /sbin, where the zpool command lives. I've attached a debdiff to fix this. I've tested to confirm that the PATH thing fixes it, but on Sunday, I'll know absolutely 100% by verifying that it works "in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1548009] Re: [FFe] ZFS pools should be automatically scrubbed

2016-07-06 Thread Richard Laager
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1548009 Title: [FFe] ZFS pools should be automatically

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1596835] Re: libnvpair.so.1 should be in /lib/, not /usr/lib/

2016-06-28 Thread Richard Laager
The same applies to libuutil1linux, libzfs2linux, and libzpool2linux. They are all required by the zfs and zpool commands. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1596835

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1594871] Re: Sync up latest relevant upstream bug fixes

2016-06-21 Thread Richard Laager
I believe it was on IRC. I think the suggestion was that it may be appropriate for ZoL. I wasn't sure if it was already in the works or not. Given that this is news to you, I assume nobody has applied for one. I realize we don't want new features. I'm not suggesting always syncing from the Ubuntu

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1594871] Re: Sync up latest relevant upstream bug fixes

2016-06-21 Thread Richard Laager
There was some talk about Ubuntu giving ZoL a "micro release exception". Either way, the best approach might be to bring in the latest micro release (i.e. SRU what is in yakkety). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1588632] CRDA.txt

2016-06-03 Thread Richard Laager
apport information ** Attachment added: "CRDA.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632/+attachment/4675757/+files/CRDA.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1588632] JournalErrors.txt

2016-06-03 Thread Richard Laager
apport information ** Attachment added: "JournalErrors.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632/+attachment/4675760/+files/JournalErrors.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1588632] PciMultimedia.txt

2016-06-03 Thread Richard Laager
apport information ** Attachment added: "PciMultimedia.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632/+attachment/4675762/+files/PciMultimedia.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1588632] ProcModules.txt

2016-06-03 Thread Richard Laager
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632/+attachment/4675765/+files/ProcModules.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1588632] CurrentDmesg.txt

2016-06-03 Thread Richard Laager
apport information ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632/+attachment/4675759/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1588632] ProcInterrupts.txt

2016-06-03 Thread Richard Laager
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632/+attachment/4675764/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1588632] AlsaDevices.txt

2016-06-03 Thread Richard Laager
apport information ** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632/+attachment/4675756/+files/AlsaDevices.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1588632] ProcCpuinfo.txt

2016-06-03 Thread Richard Laager
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632/+attachment/4675763/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1588632] Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt

2016-06-03 Thread Richard Laager
apport information ** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632/+attachment/4675758/+files/Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

  1   2   >