[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1158668] Re: Build cpupower from kernel tools

2013-08-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 3.11.0-3.6

---
linux (3.11.0-3.6) saucy; urgency=low

  [ Andy Whitcroft ]

  * [Packaging] tools: conditionalise x86 and hyper-v tools sensibly
  * [Config] tools: enable x86 and hyper-v

  [ John Johansen ]

  * Revert SAUCE: (no-up) apparmor: Sync to apparmor 3 dev stable
snapshot
  * Revert SAUCE: (no-up) apparmor: fix apparmor module status for none
root users
  * SAUCE: (no-up) apparmor: Sync to apparmor 3 - alpha 4 snapshot

  [ Joseph Salisbury ]

  * SAUCE: (no-up) intel_ips: blacklist ASUSTek G60JX laptops
- LP: #1210848

  [ Kamal Mostafa ]

  * [debian] tools: ship 'cpupower' in linux-tools
- LP: #1158668
  * [Config] Build-dep on libpci-dev for cpu tools
- LP: #1158668

  [ Tim Gardner ]

  * rebase to v3.11-rc6
  * Release tracker
- LP: #1213941
 -- Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com   Fri, 16 Aug 2013 07:02:07 -0600

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1158668

Title:
  Build cpupower from kernel tools

Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Ubuntu supplies the cpufrequtils package, which has been rendered
  obsolete by cpupower. It is included in the kernel source as of
  linux-3.1 [2], located at tools/power/cpupower/.

  I don't think that it is explicitly tied to a particular kernel
  version, so it may be best built separately from the kernel packages.
  There is no consensus among other distributions: Fedora includes it in
  their kernel-tools package; SuSE and RHEL pull from the git repo and
  build as a separate cpupower or cpupowerutils package (similar to how
  cpufrequtils was done); Arch takes it from the kernel source and
  builds it along with other tools into separate packages.

  cpupower provides a number of things that cpufrequtils does not, and
  is invaluable in a server environment for tuning of power management.
  Of particular note is the ability to set perf_bias on Intel
  processors; I am not aware of another tool that can do this. It is
  also the focus of power utility development, and should be available
  on Ubuntu systems.

  [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/433002/
  [2] 
http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.1#head-92f86d42a205e6c53d4bf6912a0dfa755f4c01f6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1158668/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1158668] Re: Build cpupower from kernel tools

2013-08-14 Thread Andy Whitcroft
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1158668

Title:
  Build cpupower from kernel tools

Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  Ubuntu supplies the cpufrequtils package, which has been rendered
  obsolete by cpupower. It is included in the kernel source as of
  linux-3.1 [2], located at tools/power/cpupower/.

  I don't think that it is explicitly tied to a particular kernel
  version, so it may be best built separately from the kernel packages.
  There is no consensus among other distributions: Fedora includes it in
  their kernel-tools package; SuSE and RHEL pull from the git repo and
  build as a separate cpupower or cpupowerutils package (similar to how
  cpufrequtils was done); Arch takes it from the kernel source and
  builds it along with other tools into separate packages.

  cpupower provides a number of things that cpufrequtils does not, and
  is invaluable in a server environment for tuning of power management.
  Of particular note is the ability to set perf_bias on Intel
  processors; I am not aware of another tool that can do this. It is
  also the focus of power utility development, and should be available
  on Ubuntu systems.

  [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/433002/
  [2] 
http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.1#head-92f86d42a205e6c53d4bf6912a0dfa755f4c01f6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1158668/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1158668] Re: Build cpupower from kernel tools

2013-08-06 Thread Christian Reis
This could probably be handled in the kernel-tools package.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Expired = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1158668

Title:
  Build cpupower from kernel tools

Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Ubuntu supplies the cpufrequtils package, which has been rendered
  obsolete by cpupower. It is included in the kernel source as of
  linux-3.1 [2], located at tools/power/cpupower/.

  I don't think that it is explicitly tied to a particular kernel
  version, so it may be best built separately from the kernel packages.
  There is no consensus among other distributions: Fedora includes it in
  their kernel-tools package; SuSE and RHEL pull from the git repo and
  build as a separate cpupower or cpupowerutils package (similar to how
  cpufrequtils was done); Arch takes it from the kernel source and
  builds it along with other tools into separate packages.

  cpupower provides a number of things that cpufrequtils does not, and
  is invaluable in a server environment for tuning of power management.
  Of particular note is the ability to set perf_bias on Intel
  processors; I am not aware of another tool that can do this. It is
  also the focus of power utility development, and should be available
  on Ubuntu systems.

  [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/433002/
  [2] 
http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.1#head-92f86d42a205e6c53d4bf6912a0dfa755f4c01f6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1158668/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1158668] Re: Build cpupower from kernel tools

2013-08-06 Thread Christian Reis
By which I mean linux-tools. ;)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1158668

Title:
  Build cpupower from kernel tools

Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Ubuntu supplies the cpufrequtils package, which has been rendered
  obsolete by cpupower. It is included in the kernel source as of
  linux-3.1 [2], located at tools/power/cpupower/.

  I don't think that it is explicitly tied to a particular kernel
  version, so it may be best built separately from the kernel packages.
  There is no consensus among other distributions: Fedora includes it in
  their kernel-tools package; SuSE and RHEL pull from the git repo and
  build as a separate cpupower or cpupowerutils package (similar to how
  cpufrequtils was done); Arch takes it from the kernel source and
  builds it along with other tools into separate packages.

  cpupower provides a number of things that cpufrequtils does not, and
  is invaluable in a server environment for tuning of power management.
  Of particular note is the ability to set perf_bias on Intel
  processors; I am not aware of another tool that can do this. It is
  also the focus of power utility development, and should be available
  on Ubuntu systems.

  [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/433002/
  [2] 
http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.1#head-92f86d42a205e6c53d4bf6912a0dfa755f4c01f6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1158668/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp