[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2014-12-04 Thread Rolf Leggewie
saucy has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any updates. Marking the saucy task for this ticket as Won't Fix. ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Saucy) Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2014-08-06 Thread Chris J Arges
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Saucy) Status: In Progress = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208455 Title: general protection fault running apt-get inside

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2014-08-04 Thread Chris J Arges
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208455 Title: general protection fault running apt-get inside

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-12-19 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: Stefan Bader (smb) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Saucy) Assignee: Stefan Bader (smb) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Assignee: Stefan Bader (smb) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Saucy)

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-12-13 Thread Seth Forshee
I tried reproducing this while using trusty on the host and was unable to do so. I also could not reproduce with the trusty kernel (currently 3.12) running with saucy userspace on the host. So as far as I can tell the issue is fixed in 3.12. I took a stab at trying to bisect, but something

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-10-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-09-17 Thread Robie Basak
Stefan: I assigned you in the server team meeting. Please unassign if you object. Thanks! ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Saucy) Assignee: (unassigned) = Stefan Bader (smb) ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu Saucy) Assignee: (unassigned) = Stefan Bader (smb) -- You received this bug

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-09-10 Thread Stefan Bader
As it seemed that starting a 64bit hypervisor (qemu-system-x86_64) from a 32bit user-space running on another 64bit hypervisor has different issues which seem to go back even further, I concentrated on bisecting the case of host running 64bit user-space on a 64bit CPU and the first level guest

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-09-10 Thread Stefan Bader
Btw, James, this means there is a simple but not very helpful work- around for Saucy: use AMD CPU based hosts. Did not check for 32bit user- space on 1rst level but with 64bit and had no issues. Not very surprising as the regression seems to be in the nested VMX code. But also not very useful when

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-22 Thread Stefan Bader
They can be even together. The -nographic removes any emulated graphics card. I am not sure in detail how the cloud images work, but I believe serial line as a console is always on. Depending on which release (in that case I think it is the qemu user-space) the used setup would not work even.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-22 Thread James Hunt
'qemu -serial file:/tmp/kvm.log' Looks like an alternative to 'qemu -nographic /tmp/kvm.log 21'. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208455 Title: general protection fault

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-22 Thread James Hunt
Re #27, removing -nographic still causes the same lockup for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208455 Title: general protection fault running apt-get inside double

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-19 Thread Stefan Bader
So host Q and 1rst 32 completed 35 runs and 1rst 64 completed 40. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208455 Title: general protection fault running apt-get inside double

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-16 Thread James Hunt
Latest kernel panic (from 2nd-level guest) using following kernel versions: host: 3.11.0-1-generic (-2 causes problems for my graphics hardware atm) 1st-level guest: 3.11.0-2-generic 2nd-level guest: 3.11.0-2-generic ** Attachment added: kvm.log

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-16 Thread Stefan Bader
I saw a similar crash when running the prepare script with a Saucy64 host, a Saucy32 1rst and Saucy32 2nd level guest. The 1rst level guest cpu set to core2duo and I also had to replace the qemu-system-x86_64 by qemu (which maps to the same arch). Otherwise the 2nd level guest was not started at

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-16 Thread Stefan Bader
Using a 64bit 1rst level guest seemed better on manual runs but running in loops seemed to have locked up on the third run. Though completely without any messages. I have to look into that next week. I need to run again with qmp enabled. At least this allows to check for the instruction pointer of

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-15 Thread James Hunt
Now that 3.11 is out of proposed, we're seeing a different kernel failure, starting with run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-update-grub 3.11.0-2-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.11.0-2-generic Generating grub.cfg ... Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.11.0-2-generic Found initrd image:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-15 Thread James Hunt
To recreate: 1) Follow instructions on internal wiki (page InformationInfrastructure/IS/CanonicalOpenstack) to create a keypair. 2) Create an guest instance: $ keyname=${USER}_lcy01 $ image=$(euca-describe-images|grep saucy|head -1|awk '{print $2}') $ euca-run-instances -k $keyname -t m1.medium

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-15 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208455 Title: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM Status in “linux” package in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-15 Thread Stefan Bader
Before running prepare-testbed: - create a directory in /mnt that user ubuntu can write to (say /mnt/adt) - echo BASEDIR=/mnt/adt ~/.adtrc autopkgtest should then use /mnt which has lots of space on medium guests. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-13 Thread Joseph Salisbury
** Tags removed: kernel-key ** Tags added: kernel-da-key -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208455 Title: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-09 Thread James Hunt
I got the panic again last night. This was running a 3.11 kernel for the host, but of course the 1st and 2nd level guests were still running 3.10 as 3.11 is still in -proposed. So, although it's possible to get a test run with (3.11, 3.10, 3.10) I really need to try running with (3.11, 3.11, 3.11)

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-08 Thread James Hunt
Testing with linux-image-3.11.0-0-generic from -proposed with nested=Y in all 3 environments does appear to solve this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208455 Title:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-08 Thread Stefan Bader
Serge mentioned today on IRC that this may be also a glibc issue, but I am not sure what exactly he was looking at and why he thinks so. Apparently ftracing (I guess the qemu process) and some partially inlining clone function (those with .isra extention) were involved. -- You received this bug

Re: [Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-08 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Stefan Bader (stefan.ba...@canonical.com): Serge mentioned today on IRC that this may be also a glibc issue, but I am not sure what exactly he was looking at and why he thinks so. Apparently ftracing (I guess the qemu process) and some partially inlining clone function (those with

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-08 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Per comment #13, it sounds like this issue is resolved in the 3.11 kernel, which is what Saucy will be rebased to. Does this issue only exist in Saucy, or should the bug be targeted to other releases as well? ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Saucy) Importance: High Status: Incomplete **

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-07 Thread James Hunt
Fresh kernel panic from 2nd-level nested VM running with host, 1st level and 2nd level all running with nested=1. ** Attachment added: kvm.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1208455/+attachment/3763650/+files/kvm.log -- You received this bug notification because you

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-07 Thread Serge Hallyn
** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208455 Title: general protection fault running apt-get inside double

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1208455] Re: general protection fault running apt-get inside double nested kvm VM

2013-08-07 Thread Serge Hallyn
All the kernel logs Ive seen have shown oops at rtc_sysfs_del_device, starting with something like [ 509.317630] general protection fault: [#1] SMP [ 509.320084] Modules linked in: dm_crypt(F) kvm_intel kvm ppdev(F) nls_utf8 isofs(F) microcode(F) parport_pc(F) pvpanic parport(F)