Public bug reported: Dear Developers and maintainers,
trying not to make a big fuzz about it: Let me just quote https://bugs.launchpad.net/baltix/+bug/930447/comments/97 from 2012-06-05: > The non-PAE version of the Linux kernel will be dropped completely following the 12.04 release. Pls correct me and mark as invalid, if Ubuntu doesnt have to follow naming conventions given on Linux-Kernel. Trying to find appropiate information in the package change-log: linux-meta (3.4.0.1.1) quantal; urgency=low * Open Quantal Quetzal 12.10 * Temporarily disable LBM * Remove non-PAE i386 references -- mail adress hid...@canonical.com> Wed, 02 May 2012 06:21:45 -0700 Pls clarify this and correct Ubuntus Kernel-nming on i386 package if appropriate Personally I think Linus wouldn't smile, even though if I thought the index-finger to Nvidia was a bit to rough. Personally I think this bug has security-potential. Thanks for helping to make Ubuntu better every day. ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: precise quantal raring saucy ** Description changed: Dear Developers and maintainers, trying not to make a big fuzz about it: Let me just quote https://bugs.launchpad.net/baltix/+bug/930447/comments/97 from 2012-06-05: > The non-PAE version of the Linux kernel will be dropped completely following the 12.04 release. Pls correct me and mark as invalid, if Ubuntu doesnt have to follow naming conventions given on Linux-Kernel. - Trying to find appropiate inormation in the package change-log: + Trying to find appropiate information in the package change-log: linux-meta (3.4.0.1.1) quantal; urgency=low - * Open Quantal Quetzal 12.10 - * Temporarily disable LBM - * Remove non-PAE i386 references + * Open Quantal Quetzal 12.10 + * Temporarily disable LBM + * Remove non-PAE i386 references - -- mail adress hid...@canonical.com> Wed, 02 May 2012 06:21:45 -0700 + -- mail adress hid...@canonical.com> Wed, 02 May 2012 06:21:45 -0700 Pls clarify this and correct Ubuntus Kernel-nming on i386 package if appropriate Personally I think Linus wouldn't smile, even though if I thought the index-finger to Nvidia was a bit to rough. Personally I think this bug has security-potential. Thanks for helping to make Ubuntu better every day. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1214462 Title: Kernel Description doesn't explain its a PAE-Kernel _ since 3.4.0.1.1 _ Linus would not smile _. Status in “linux-meta” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Dear Developers and maintainers, trying not to make a big fuzz about it: Let me just quote https://bugs.launchpad.net/baltix/+bug/930447/comments/97 from 2012-06-05: > The non-PAE version of the Linux kernel will be dropped completely following the 12.04 release. Pls correct me and mark as invalid, if Ubuntu doesnt have to follow naming conventions given on Linux-Kernel. Trying to find appropiate information in the package change-log: linux-meta (3.4.0.1.1) quantal; urgency=low * Open Quantal Quetzal 12.10 * Temporarily disable LBM * Remove non-PAE i386 references -- mail adress hid...@canonical.com> Wed, 02 May 2012 06:21:45 -0700 Pls clarify this and correct Ubuntus Kernel-nming on i386 package if appropriate Personally I think Linus wouldn't smile, even though if I thought the index-finger to Nvidia was a bit to rough. Personally I think this bug has security-potential. Thanks for helping to make Ubuntu better every day. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1214462/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
