[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1350947] Re: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private

2015-01-15 Thread Martin Pitt
** No longer affects: linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1350947 Title: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private Status in AppArmor Linux

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1350947] Re: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private

2015-01-08 Thread Martin Pitt
I created an upstream patch and a pull request at https://github.com/lxc/lxc/pull/393 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1350947 Title: apparmor: no working rule to allow

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1350947] Re: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private

2015-01-08 Thread Serge Hallyn
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1350947 Title: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1350947] Re: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private

2014-12-17 Thread Jill Rouleau
** Tags added: canonical-bootstack -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1350947 Title: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private Status in AppArmor Linux

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1350947] Re: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private

2014-12-12 Thread James Page
Bumped priority for this bug as this is part of priority activity for reference OpenStack deployments for the vivid cycle . ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium = High ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium = High ** Tags added: landscape -- You received this bug

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1350947] Re: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private

2014-12-12 Thread Martin Pitt
I confirm that this works fine under systemd: mount options=(rw, make-slave) - **, Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1350947 Title: apparmor: no working rule to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1350947] Re: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private

2014-12-11 Thread Serge Hallyn
Apparmor is recognizing make-slave', not slave. While apparmor will be updated to accept 'slave' we should update the lxc policies to use 'make-slave' in the meantime. Assigning this to Stéphane as he hasn't yet had a chance to show me the new git-dpm packaging process :) ** Changed in: lxc

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1350947] Re: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private

2014-12-11 Thread Tyler Hicks
As a result of the slave versus make-slave revelation, I've created two upstream AppArmor bugs. The first is for the AppArmor documentation being wrong about the acceptable mount option strings (bug #1401619). The second is for the AppArmor parser accepting unknown mount option strings (bug

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1350947] Re: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private

2014-12-11 Thread James Page
** Tags added: smoosh -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1350947 Title: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private Status in AppArmor Linux application

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1350947] Re: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private

2014-11-19 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1350947

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1350947] Re: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private

2014-10-10 Thread Jamie Strandboge
** Changed in: apparmor Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: apparmor Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1350947 Title: apparmor:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1350947] Re: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private

2014-08-29 Thread Martin Pitt
Setting to incomplete for now. This either needs fixing in AppArmor properly, or I at least need to get some hints how to change the current rule to work with current AppArmor. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are

Re: [Kernel-packages] [Bug 1350947] Re: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private

2014-08-29 Thread Serge Hallyn
affects: apparmor ** Also affects: apparmor Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1350947 Title: apparmor: no working rule to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1350947] Re: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private

2014-07-31 Thread Martin Pitt
I tested this on trusty's 3.13.0-32, and the previous utopic 3.15.0-6, same result. So it's not a regression apparently; although I tried mount options=(rw, slave) - / some weeks ago and it appeared to work, but apparently I did something weird back then which made it work, but I can't remember

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1350947] Re: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private

2014-07-31 Thread John Johansen
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = John Johansen (jjohansen) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1350947] Re: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private

2014-07-31 Thread Martin Pitt
Adding an LXC task; after we figure out how the rule needs to look like/fixing the apparmor parser or linux bug, we need to adjust LXC's apparmor policy. This was originally bug 1325468, but it's easier to have it in one bug. ** Also affects: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1350947] Re: apparmor: no working rule to allow making a mount private

2014-07-31 Thread Martin Pitt
** Description changed: When the file system is mounted as MS_SHARED by default (such as under systemd, or when the admin configures it so), things like schroot or LXC need to make their guest mounts private. This currently fails under utopic: $ sudo lxc-create -t busybox -n c1 $