[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1602755] Re: Tunnel offload indications not stripped from encapsulated packets, causing performance overhead

2019-10-03 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
3.13 (14.04) has been moved to ESM now, this won't be fixed there. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1602755] Re: Tunnel offload indications not stripped from encapsulated packets, causing performance overhead

2016-12-04 Thread Gideon Naim
Please backport this fix also to trusty 14.04 LTS Thanks, Gidi ** Tags added: trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1602755 Title: Tunnel offload indications not

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1602755] Re: Tunnel offload indications not stripped from encapsulated packets, causing performance overhead

2016-08-29 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 4.4.0-36.55 --- linux (4.4.0-36.55) xenial; urgency=low [ Stefan Bader ] * Release Tracking Bug - LP: #1612305 * I2C touchpad does not work on AMD platform (LP: #1612006) - SAUCE: pinctrl/amd: Remove the default de-bounce time

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1602755] Re: Tunnel offload indications not stripped from encapsulated packets, causing performance overhead

2016-08-17 Thread Stefan Bader
It would have been appropriate (who would be better qualified than the reporter ;)). But I can do that for you now. Thanks for testing and reporting back. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done-xenial ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1602755] Re: Tunnel offload indications not stripped from encapsulated packets, causing performance overhead

2016-08-16 Thread Jesse Gross
I tested the proposed kernel and it solves the problem. I'm not sure if it is appropriate for me to change the tag though or if that should wait for a larger QA effort. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1602755] Re: Tunnel offload indications not stripped from encapsulated packets, causing performance overhead

2016-08-16 Thread Stefan Bader
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed- xenial' to 'verification-done-xenial'. If verification is not done by 5 working days from

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1602755] Re: Tunnel offload indications not stripped from encapsulated packets, causing performance overhead

2016-07-29 Thread Kamal Mostafa
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1602755 Title: Tunnel offload indications not stripped

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1602755] Re: Tunnel offload indications not stripped from encapsulated packets, causing performance overhead

2016-07-25 Thread Jesse Gross
I tested this (both IPv4 over Geneve and IPv6 over sit) as well as looked at the proposed patch and everything looks good to me. With a very simple setup (this does not go up to VMs so the full performance difference is not there), I see correct packet aggregation and improved performance:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1602755] Re: Tunnel offload indications not stripped from encapsulated packets, causing performance overhead

2016-07-14 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1602755 Title: Tunnel offload indications not stripped from encapsulated packets, causing performance overhead

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1602755] Re: Tunnel offload indications not stripped from encapsulated packets, causing performance overhead

2016-07-14 Thread Stefan Bader
Would it be possible to verify whether the proposed backport satisfies performance expectations. In particular exercising ipv6/sit since I had to adapt the patch there to make up for iptunnel_pull_header only having 3 arguments in 4.4. Test kernel can be found at:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1602755] Re: Tunnel offload indications not stripped from encapsulated packets, causing performance overhead

2016-07-14 Thread Stefan Bader
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Stefan Bader (smb) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1602755] Re: Tunnel offload indications not stripped from encapsulated packets, causing performance overhead

2016-07-13 Thread Leann Ogasawara
Looks like we have picked this up in Yakkety for 16.10 already. Will mark that task Fix Committed. git describe --contains a09a4c8dd1ec7f830e1fb9e59eb72bddc965d168 v4.6-rc1~38^2~35^2 It's been requested we consider this for SRU for Xenial. ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: