Public bug reported: This is a long standing issue seen on ubuntu
ACPI Error: [\_SB_.PCI0.XHC_.RHUB.HS11] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160930/dswload-210) kernel: ACPI Exception: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20160930/psobject-227) kernel: ACPI Exception: AE_NOT_FOUND, (SSDT:xh_rvp08) while loading table (20160930/tbxfload-228) kernel: ACPI Error: 1 table load failures, 5 successful (20160930/tbxfload-246) As per https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117671, that should be fixed with recent kernels. comment from #4 of the above report: *************** The problem happens when the ACPICA interpreter is trying to load the SSDT. So this is the known module level code support issue. This module level support could be fixed by just moving module level execution to per-table basis, thus this should have already been fixed by an upstream module level support improvement. **************** https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=linux-next&id=3d4b7ae9 ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "AcpiError.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1690502/+attachment/4875996/+files/AcpiError.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1690502 Title: ACPI Error: [\_SB_.PCI0.XHC_.RHUB.HS11] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160930/dswload-210) Status in linux package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: This is a long standing issue seen on ubuntu ACPI Error: [\_SB_.PCI0.XHC_.RHUB.HS11] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND (20160930/dswload-210) kernel: ACPI Exception: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20160930/psobject-227) kernel: ACPI Exception: AE_NOT_FOUND, (SSDT:xh_rvp08) while loading table (20160930/tbxfload-228) kernel: ACPI Error: 1 table load failures, 5 successful (20160930/tbxfload-246) As per https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117671, that should be fixed with recent kernels. comment from #4 of the above report: *************** The problem happens when the ACPICA interpreter is trying to load the SSDT. So this is the known module level code support issue. This module level support could be fixed by just moving module level execution to per-table basis, thus this should have already been fixed by an upstream module level support improvement. **************** https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=linux-next&id=3d4b7ae9 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1690502/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
