Public bug reported:
I am unable to launch perf on 4.11.0-9-generic (artful) running on
artful-proposed
/usr/lib/linux-tools/4.11.0-9-generic/perf: error while loading shared
libraries: libbfd-2.28-system.so: cannot open shared object file: No
such file or directory
It seems this library is provided by binutils, however the symlink
doesn't exist like it does on my xenial system for comparison.
lathiat@ubuntu:~$ dpkg -L binutils|grep bfd|grep so
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd-2.28.51-system.20170627.so
lathiat@ubuntu:~$ ls /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/*libbfd*
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd-2.28.51-powerpc.20170627.so
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd-2.28.51-system.20170627.so
On xenial:
root@hyper:~# ls /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/*libbfd*
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd-2.26.1-system.so
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd.a
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd-2.26-system.so
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd.so
Not clear to me where the bug lies here, so starting with the 'perf' binary by
way of the kernel package. But may be an issue with something else. I did
notice quickly running 'ldd' in /usr/bin that it seems other files are linking
against the above so directly.
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Incomplete
** Tags: artful
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1702056
Title:
perf broken on 4.11.0-9-generic (artful): /usr/lib/linux-
tools/4.11.0-9-generic/perf: error while loading shared libraries:
libbfd-2.28-system.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Bug description:
I am unable to launch perf on 4.11.0-9-generic (artful) running on
artful-proposed
/usr/lib/linux-tools/4.11.0-9-generic/perf: error while loading shared
libraries: libbfd-2.28-system.so: cannot open shared object file: No
such file or directory
It seems this library is provided by binutils, however the symlink
doesn't exist like it does on my xenial system for comparison.
lathiat@ubuntu:~$ dpkg -L binutils|grep bfd|grep so
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd-2.28.51-system.20170627.so
lathiat@ubuntu:~$ ls /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/*libbfd*
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd-2.28.51-powerpc.20170627.so
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd-2.28.51-system.20170627.so
On xenial:
root@hyper:~# ls /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/*libbfd*
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd-2.26.1-system.so
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd.a
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd-2.26-system.so
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbfd.so
Not clear to me where the bug lies here, so starting with the 'perf' binary
by way of the kernel package. But may be an issue with something else. I did
notice quickly running 'ldd' in /usr/bin that it seems other files are linking
against the above so directly.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1702056/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
