[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1301672] [NEW] [Hewlett-Packard HP EliteBook 8740w] suspend/resume failure

2014-04-02 Thread Mike Pontillo
Public bug reported: If I suspend my HP EliteBook 8740w, the screen goes blank. Other portions of the system still function, such as sound, and networking. This is a fresh install of 14.04; I did not have SSH installed yet, but now I do. So I can recreate the issue and gather more information

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1291371] Re: thinkpad screen dims after unplugging external display, and won't re-brighten without leaving X

2015-04-21 Thread Mike Pontillo
FYI, I can confirm this on a Clevo W230SS. (It has both an nvidia an Intel chipset, but I keep it in Intel-only mode.) Let me know if I can do anything to assist. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1524069] Re: Xenial KVM: updating Trusty guest from 3.13.0-68 to 3.13.0-71 causes kernel exception

2015-12-08 Thread Mike Pontillo
I just tried again with two logical CPUs and the core set to "Westmere" (I think that was the default), and didn't see the bug. So this seems related specifically to "[x] Copy host CPU configuration" being checked. Here's the /proc/cpuinfo from the "virtual Westmere" where it works:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1524069] Re: Xenial KVM: updating Trusty guest from 3.13.0-68 to 3.13.0-71 causes kernel exception

2015-12-08 Thread Mike Pontillo
Also, the hypervisor's /proc/cpuinfo reports the following CPU configuration (8 cores of the same): processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 60 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4710MQ CPU @ 2.50GHz stepping: 3 microcode : 0x1e

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1524069] [NEW] Xenial KVM: updating Trusty guest from 3.13.0-68 to 3.13.0-71 causes kernel exception

2015-12-08 Thread Mike Pontillo
Public bug reported: The symptom I saw was this (note the segfault, and apt-get upgrade hangs after this): Setting up linux-image-3.13.0-71-generic (3.13.0-71.114) ... Running depmod. update-initramfs: deferring update (hook will be called later) Examining /etc/kernel/postinst.d. run-parts:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1524069] Re: Xenial KVM: updating Trusty guest from 3.13.0-68 to 3.13.0-71 causes kernel exception

2015-12-08 Thread Mike Pontillo
For what it's worth, unchecking "[ ] Copy host CPU configuration" in virt-manager and selecting "Hypervisor default" for the CPU is a workaround. (/proc/cpuinfo reports "QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.4.0") -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1524069] Re: [Xenial] KVM trusty guest 3.13.0-68 raid6-pq panic in raid6_avx21_gen_syndrome() while probing grub devices [was: Xenial KVM: updating Trusty guest from 3.13.0-68 t

2015-12-09 Thread Mike Pontillo
On my Trusty VM with "[x] Copy host CPU configuration" checked in virt- manager, running 'sudo modprobe -r raid6_pq && sudo modprobe raid6_pq' is enough to reproduce the kernel exception in dmesg (though I didn't see it print "Segmentation Fault", so that may be somewhat of a red herring). Here's

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1524069] Re: [Xenial] KVM trusty guest 3.13.0-68 raid6-pq panic in raid6_avx21_gen_syndrome() while probing grub devices [was: Xenial KVM: updating Trusty guest from 3.13.0-68 t

2015-12-16 Thread Mike Pontillo
@Serge, A workaround for me is to use "hypervisor default" in virt- manager. I'm not sure what the equivalent is in virt-install, but maybe using --cpu=host-model-only would be a workaround? >From the man page: Expose the host CPUs configuration to the guest. This enables the

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1666683] Re: Default VM overcommit sysctls in Ubuntu lead to unnecessary oom-killer invocation

2017-02-21 Thread Mike Pontillo
Changing status to "Confirmed". I don't think there are any relevant logs for this issue. Here's some anecdotal evidence, though: # dmesg | grep oom-killer [1389379.248406] apt-mirror invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x26000c0, order=2, oom_score_adj=0 [1399428.772409] chrome invoked oom-killer:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1666683] [NEW] Default VM overcommit sysctls in Ubuntu lead to unnecessary oom-killer invocation

2017-02-21 Thread Mike Pontillo
Public bug reported: On my system, running a couple of LXD containers and VMs (16 GB RAM, 16 GB swap) seems to cause the kernel oom-killer to be frequently triggered. In order to try to resolve this, first I tried limiting the memory my containers were allowed to use, such as by using: lxc

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1666683] Re: Default VM overcommit sysctls in Ubuntu lead to unnecessary oom-killer invocation

2017-02-22 Thread Mike Pontillo
Hm. Oddly enough, pulseaudio seemed to have problems for me until I set the overcommit ratio higher (to 150). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183 Title: Default VM

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1666683] Re: Default VM overcommit sysctls in Ubuntu lead to unnecessary oom-killer invocation

2017-03-01 Thread Mike Pontillo
After a few days of uptime I still saw issues with the ratio set to 100. I'll give 0 a try. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183 Title: Default VM overcommit sysctls

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1457472] Re: TPACKET_V3 in Linux before 3.19 causes packet loss in libpcap

2016-09-13 Thread Mike Pontillo
I have tested this on kernel 4.4.0 (in Xenial) and I don't think the fix that went into 3.19 fixed the entire issue. My understanding is that since nmap uses a relatively long pcap_select() timeout, and the packet buffers in the kernel aren't filling up fast enough, the packet loss can still be

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1457472] Re: TPACKET_V3 in Linux before 3.19 causes packet loss in libpcap

2016-09-14 Thread Mike Pontillo
Inspired by the flow-disruptor workaround, I did a proof-of-concept nmap workaround as follows: http://paste.ubuntu.com/23176851/ Obviously, this is nowhere near production-ready code, but I wanted to convince myself that the pcap_set_immediate_mode() workaround could work in nmap as well. --

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1457472] Re: TPACKET_V3 in Linux before 3.19 causes packet loss in libpcap

2016-09-14 Thread Mike Pontillo
** Project changed: tcpdump => libpcap -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1457472 Title: TPACKET_V3 in Linux before 3.19 causes packet loss in libpcap Status in libpcap:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1651602] Re: [2.1.1] MAAS has nvme0n1 set as boot disk, curtin fails

2017-01-05 Thread Mike Pontillo
I discussed this with cgregan on IRC and I think we came to the conclusion that the MAAS/curtin bug is simply that the two kernels (commissioning vs. ephemeral deployment) gather different (or missing) unique identifiers for each drive. To validate that, I would run the following on each kernel

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1651602] Re: [2.1.1] MAAS has nvme0n1 set as boot disk, curtin fails

2017-01-05 Thread Mike Pontillo
After further troubleshooting with cgregan, we've further narrowed this down. We ran the following script on the node that was having trouble: https://gist.github.com/pontillo/0b92a7da2fba43fb5dce705be2dcf38b Unlike all the other devices MAAS works with, the Intel NVMe device reports a serial

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1651602] Re: [2.1.1] MAAS has nvme0n1 set as boot disk, curtin fails

2017-01-05 Thread Mike Pontillo
Marking this bug 'New' for the kernel, since this has to do with the Intel NVMe device links, not the related SMP issue that came up. ** Changed in: maas Status: Invalid => Won't Fix ** Summary changed: - [2.1.1] MAAS has nvme0n1 set as boot disk, curtin fails + Intel NVMe driver does

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1739672] Re: Regression in getaddrinfo(): calls block for much longer on Bionic (compared to Xenial)

2018-01-04 Thread Mike Pontillo
Workaround: grep -q 'LLMNR=no' /etc/systemd/resolved.conf || \ echo 'LLMNR=no' | sudo tee -a /etc/systemd/resolved.conf sudo service systemd-networkd restart -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1739672] Re: Regression in getaddrinfo(): calls block for much longer on Bionic (compared to Xenial)

2017-12-21 Thread Mike Pontillo
** Description changed: When testing MAAS on Bionic, we noticed sluggish performance that we could not immediately explain. After comparing the results from a run of the test suite on Xenial to a run on Bionic, we determined that the slowdowns had to do with DNS lookups. In

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1739672] Re: Regression in getaddrinfo(): calls block for much longer on Bionic (compared to Xenial)

2017-12-21 Thread Mike Pontillo
I just tested with the Xenial kernel and Bionic userspace and observed that the bug still occurs, so marked Invalid for 'linux'. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1739672] Re: Regression in getaddrinfo(): calls block for much longer on Bionic (compared to Xenial)

2018-01-04 Thread Mike Pontillo
Interesting; the first thing I tried when triaging this was to edit /etc/nsswitch.conf as follows: # hosts: files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns myhostname hosts: files dns ... to eliminate the possibility that it was multicast DNS causing the slowdown. But it appears I'm

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1739672] [NEW] Regression in getaddrinfo(): calls block for much longer on Bionic (compared to Xenial)

2017-12-21 Thread Mike Pontillo
Public bug reported: When testing MAAS on Bionic, we noticed sluggish performance that we could not immediately explain. After comparing the results from a run of the test suite on Xenial to a run on Bionic, we determined that the slowdowns had to do with DNS lookups. In particular, if MAAS

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1739672] Re: Regression in getaddrinfo(): calls block for much longer on Bionic (compared to Xenial)

2017-12-21 Thread Mike Pontillo
Note: I doubt this bug is in the kernel itself; I initially attempted to file it under glibc at first, but for some reason the `linux` package was selected. I also added `systemd` in case the difference in behavior can be explained by the addition of resolved. Note that these tests were run on

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1739672] Re: Regression in getaddrinfo(): calls block for much longer on Bionic (compared to Xenial)

2017-12-22 Thread Mike Pontillo
** Tags added: bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1739672 Title: Regression in getaddrinfo(): calls block for much longer on Bionic (compared to Xenial) Status in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1784501] Re: libvirtd is unable to configure bridge devices inside of LXD containers

2018-08-23 Thread Mike Pontillo
This seems to be a regression on bionic; I have been using libvirtd inside a container for several weeks; today when I tore down and rebuilt the container I hit this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1784501] Re: libvirtd is unable to configure bridge devices inside of LXD containers

2018-08-23 Thread Mike Pontillo
Nothing has changed regarding privileged vs. unprivileged settings. I just set this up again with a privileged container, and I believe the cause of the regression to actually be in libvirt. I think it must have silently ignored the bridge configuration error before and marked the network active

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1784501] Re: libvirtd is unable to configure bridge devices inside of LXD containers

2018-08-23 Thread Mike Pontillo
To be fair, it's also possible that I did something like the following in my previous test container and forgot about it. ;-) cat << EOF > maas.xml maas EOF virsh net-define maas.xml rm maas.xml virsh net-start maas virsh net-autostart maas -- You received this bug notification

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1784501] Re: libvirtd is unable to configure bridge devices inside of LXD containers

2018-08-24 Thread Mike Pontillo
My 2nd theory was correct. ;-) Sorry for polluting this bug report with my thinking-out-loud. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1784501 Title: libvirtd is unable to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1759920] Re: intel-microcode 3.20180312.0 causes lockup at login screen(w/ linux-image-4.13.0-37-generic)

2018-04-03 Thread Mike Pontillo
@tyhicks, I don't have an Artful test system, but I confirmed on Xenial (4.4.0-116-generic) that `apparmor=0` is a workaround, without the `noibpb` option and with intel-microcode version 3.20180312.0~ubuntu16.04.1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1797581] Re: Composing a VM in MAAS with exactly 2048 MB RAM causes the VM to kernel panic

2018-10-12 Thread Mike Pontillo
Here's the log from the failing VM. Doesn't look too unusual to me... https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/JpmSxmwjfM/ ** Description changed: Using latest MAAS master, I'm unable to compose a VM over the UI - successfully. BY this it means that the VM is created, but it fails with - a kernel panic. -

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1797581] Re: Composing a VM in MAAS with exactly 2048 MB RAM causes the VM to kernel panic

2018-10-12 Thread Mike Pontillo
** Summary changed: - Composing a VM in MAAS with exactly 2048 MB RAM causes kernel panic + Composing a VM in MAAS with exactly 2048 MB RAM causes the VM to kernel panic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1797581] Re: Composing a VM in MAAS with exactly 2048 MB RAM causes the VM to kernel panic

2018-10-12 Thread Mike Pontillo
Here's an example of working XML (with 2047 MB RAM) that MAAS generated: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/mkF6Kp4hx8/ And here's an example of non-working XML (with 2048 MB RAM) that MAAS generated: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/27HHDrzwm8/ ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete =>

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1797581] Re: Composing a VM in MAAS with exactly 2048 MB RAM causes the VM to kernel panic

2018-10-12 Thread Mike Pontillo
Here's the version information. libvirt-bin: Installed: 4.0.0-1ubuntu8.5 Candidate: 4.0.0-1ubuntu8.5 Version table: *** 4.0.0-1ubuntu8.5 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 4.0.0-1ubuntu8.2 500

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 713556] Re: Sharkoon Fireglider mouse is wrongly detected as a joystick

2018-10-11 Thread Mike Pontillo
** Merge proposal unlinked: https://code.launchpad.net/~newell-jensen/maas/+git/maas/+merge/343053 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713556 Title: Sharkoon Fireglider

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1797581] Re: Composing a VM in MAAS with exactly 2048 MB RAM causes the VM to kernel panic

2018-10-12 Thread Mike Pontillo
Here's a full console log from the failure. https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/zmS7CP7NKr/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1797581 Title: Composing a VM in MAAS with exactly

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1797581] Re: [2.5] Composing a VM with 2048 MB RAM causes kernel panic

2018-10-12 Thread Mike Pontillo
Adding the linux package; we should narrow down the issue to see if it's in kernel space or user space. ** Summary changed: - [2.5, UI] Composing a VM over the UI is broken - VM has kernel panic + [2.5] Composing a VM with 2048 MB RAM causes kernel panic ** Changed in: maas Status:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1797581] Re: [2.5] Composing a VM with 2048 MB RAM causes kernel panic

2018-10-12 Thread Mike Pontillo
To be clear, the kernel panic is seen when a VM is composed in MAAS with exactly 2048 MB of RAM. Composing with 2047 or 2049 MB RAM results in a working VM. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1797581] Re: [2.5] Composing a VM with 2048 MB RAM causes kernel panic

2018-10-12 Thread Mike Pontillo
We can't run apport-collect since the machine doesn't boot, but this was seen with a non-tainted 4.15.0.36-generic kernel in my environment. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Summary changed: - [2.5] Composing a VM with 2048 MB RAM causes kernel panic + Composing

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1797581] Re: Composing a VM in MAAS with exactly 2048 MB RAM causes the VM to kernel panic

2018-10-12 Thread Mike Pontillo
It's an empty image - MAAS PXE boots the VM. Could you give it a try with MAAS? I can help you with the setup if needed - just ping me on IRC. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1797581] Re: Composing a VM in MAAS with exactly 2048 MB RAM causes the VM to kernel panic

2018-10-17 Thread Mike Pontillo
Looking again at the date stamps, I don't see any squashfs filesystems older than October 15th. The kernels are all from ~September 25th. So I feel like this must have been an interaction between the kernel September 25th and whatever the previous squashfs was. -- You received this bug

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1797581] Re: Composing a VM in MAAS with exactly 2048 MB RAM causes the VM to kernel panic

2018-10-17 Thread Mike Pontillo
After triaging this again on a call with Andres (who originally reported this) this morning, we determined that this issue is no longer reproducible with MAAS. The only way for me to explain it at this point was that there was something wrong with the daily image MAAS was using last week, and a

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1797581] Re: Composing a VM in MAAS with exactly 2048 MB RAM causes the VM to kernel panic

2018-10-17 Thread Mike Pontillo
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete ** Changed in: maas Status: Invalid => Incomplete ** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1797581] Re: Composing a VM in MAAS with exactly 2048 MB RAM causes the VM to kernel panic

2018-10-16 Thread Mike Pontillo
** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1797581 Title: Composing a VM in MAAS with exactly 2048 MB RAM causes

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1797581] Re: Composing a VM in MAAS with exactly 2048 MB RAM causes the VM to kernel panic

2018-10-16 Thread Mike Pontillo
I agree that this doesn't look like a QEMU issue, and I agree that it doesn't look like a [general] networking hiccup. @paelzer, the easiest way to get the exact configs you need would be to install MAAS similar to how I've described on our discourse forum[1]. The PXE config will be /similar/ to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1797581] Re: Composing a VM in MAAS with exactly 2048 MB RAM causes the VM to kernel panic

2018-10-16 Thread Mike Pontillo
Good idea @rharper. It's easy for MAAS to attempt commissioning on Xenial or Bionic, so I gave Xenial a try. It works fine![1] [1]: Console log - https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/58hfBX6BhY/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1797581] Re: Composing a VM in MAAS with exactly 2048 MB RAM causes the VM to kernel panic

2018-10-16 Thread Mike Pontillo
... it's interesting that [practically?] the same kernel version that fails consistently with Bionic works just fine with Xenial. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1797581

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1797581] Re: Composing a VM in MAAS with exactly 2048 MB RAM causes the VM to kernel panic

2018-10-16 Thread Mike Pontillo
I just tried Xenial with the HWE kernel - same result (success). FYI. https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/WpqHnzbsS7/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1797581 Title: Composing a

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1805920] Re: iPXE ignores vlan 0 traffic

2018-12-05 Thread Mike Pontillo
Setting to 'Confirmed' in the kernel, although it's not clear what the actual fix would entail. It would certainly be nice to be able to tell a Linux virtual bridge to transparently strip off priority tags before L2 forwarding occurs. That would prevent the issue with iPXE. ** Changed in: linux

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1805920] Re: iPXE ignores vlan 0 traffic

2018-12-07 Thread Mike Pontillo
Sorry for the confusion. To be clear, the idea of using MAAS on Xenial was in order to test if the newly-modified iPXE (on Bionic) can support iSCSI boot. But come to think of it, I don't think that's a good test. If I remember correctly, MAAS used TFTP to transfer the kernel and initrd, /then/

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1805920] Re: iPXE ignores vlan 0 traffic

2018-12-06 Thread Mike Pontillo
Yes, MAAS 2.3 (the last revision of MAAS supported on Xenial) can support iSCSI when it is placed in backward compatibility mode; how to do this is documented in the changelog as follows: maas $PROFILE maas set-config name=http_boot value=False MAAS 2.2 and earlier (no longer supported) used

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1805920] Re: iPXE ignores vlan 0 traffic

2018-12-06 Thread Mike Pontillo
Unfortunately, a modern MAAS no longer uses iSCSI; it will fetch all necessary data over HTTP. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805920 Title: iPXE ignores vlan 0 traffic

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2028186] Re: zfs with encryption: sluggish resume from suspend, intermittent freezes

2023-11-07 Thread Mike Pontillo
FWIW, I switched back to ext4 and am no longer experiencing the same issues. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux-signed-hwe-5.19 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028186 Title: zfs with encryption: sluggish

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1973827] Re: Laptop freezes when recovering from suspend / sleep mode

2023-07-18 Thread Mike Pontillo
I'm seeing a similar issue on a laptop which was working fine until I reinstalled Ubuntu Jammy with ZFS (with full-disk encryption enabled). Sometimes it freezes for several seconds, but sometimes I wait hours and it never recovers. I don't think this is a gnome-shell issue, but I'm unsure how to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1973827] Re: Laptop freezes when recovering from suspend / sleep mode

2023-07-19 Thread Mike Pontillo
ack; filed bug 2028186. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973827 Title: Laptop freezes when recovering from suspend / sleep mode Status in gnome-shell package in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2028186] [NEW] zfs with encryption: sluggish resume from suspend, intermittent freezes

2023-07-19 Thread Mike Pontillo
Public bug reported: I had been using Jammy on a Thinkpad T470 for months without problems. I decided to try a fresh Ubuntu Desktop install using ZFS, using the install-time option for full-disk encryption. After using the fresh install for a little while, I noticed that the system was "more