[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions

2021-10-13 Thread Steve Langasek
The Precise Pangolin has reached end of life, so this bug will not be fixed for that release ** Changed in: linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Precise) Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions

2016-09-21 Thread Chris J Arges
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Trusty) Assignee: Chris J Arges (arges) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Utopic) Assignee: Chris J Arges (arges) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Precise) Assignee: Chris J Arges (arges) => (unassigned) -- You receiv

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions

2016-04-24 Thread Rolf Leggewie
utopic has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any updates. Marking the utopic task for this ticket as "Won't Fix". ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Utopic) Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, wh

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions

2015-06-08 Thread Chris J Arges
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: Chris J Arges (arges) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371591 Title: file not initialized to 0s under some con

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions

2015-05-21 Thread Andy Whitcroft
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Utopic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Precise) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification be

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions

2015-01-31 Thread Mathew Hodson
** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2014-3610 ** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2014-3611 ** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2014-3646 ** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?nam

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions

2015-01-31 Thread Mathew Hodson
** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream-v3.17-rc1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371591 Title: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions Status in linux packag

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions

2015-01-21 Thread Chris J Arges
* should be uninstalled when testing is over. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371591 Title: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions Status in linux package in U

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions

2015-01-13 Thread Chris J Arges
Ok so I think the issue here is that the device in ESXi is not properly blacklisted. Taking the patch from: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/17/442 Blacklists multiple devices and should be the better solution than my original patch. I've created some test builds against 3.16 and 3.13, if those aff

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions

2015-01-09 Thread Chris J Arges
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Utopic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Utopic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu Utopic) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Utopic)

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions

2015-01-08 Thread Andrew Reis
This bug also exists 14.10 - kernel version 3.16.0-25.33 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371591 Title: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions Status in linux p

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions

2014-11-12 Thread Greg Swallow
We are on ESXi, version 5.5, according to our hosting provider. To run the test, I created a new, 40GB virtual disk. It's attached as SCSI ID 1:3, on a VMware Paravirtual SCSI adapter. I set it up as a PV and put ext4 on it the "fast way," which is what I always do: 701 pvcreate /dev/sdd

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions

2014-11-11 Thread Chris J Arges
@greg, Hi which VMware platform are you on, ESX or Fusion/WS? Could you try running the test case as described in the description to see if it is the same issue? Thanks, --chris -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubu

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions

2014-11-11 Thread Greg Swallow
Hi, We just hit this bug on 3.13.0-39.66~precise1, running MongoDB 2.6.3. We're running Precise, with the trusty HWE enabled. We're on VMware, though from reading this bug report it doesn't matter. Is there anything we can report to be helpful? -- You received this bug notification because you

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions

2014-10-29 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux-lts-trusty - 3.13.0-39.66~precise1 --- linux-lts-trusty (3.13.0-39.66~precise1) precise; urgency=low [ Luis Henriques ] * Release Tracking Bug - LP: #1386866 [ Upstream Kernel Changes ] * KVM: x86: Check non-canonical addresses up

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions

2014-10-28 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 3.13.0-39.66 --- linux (3.13.0-39.66) trusty; urgency=low [ Luis Henriques ] * Release Tracking Bug - LP: #1386629 [ Upstream Kernel Changes ] * KVM: x86: Check non-canonical addresses upon WRMSR - LP: #1384539 - CVE-201

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions

2014-10-20 Thread Chris J Arges
Verified in my trusty VM. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-trusty ** Tags added: verification-done-trusty ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linu

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions

2014-10-20 Thread Chris J Arges
** Description changed: + SRU Justification: + + [Impact] + Under some conditions, after fallocate() the file is observed not to be completely initilized to 0s: some 4KB pages have left-over data from previous files that occupied those pages. Note that in addition to causing functional p

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions

2014-10-16 Thread Kane York
Fix is in Christoph Hellwig's tree, on path to 3.18 and backport to stable. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/25/482 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linu

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions

2014-10-16 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions

2014-10-16 Thread Swapneel Kekre
** Summary changed: - file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare + file not initialized to 0s under some conditions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371591

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-10-16 Thread Chris J Arges
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: linux (Ubuntu Precise) ** Also affects: linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-10-16 Thread Brad Figg
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed- trusty' to 'verification-done-trusty'. If verification is not done by 5 working days from t

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-10-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/trusty-proposed/linux-keystone -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371591 Title: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare Statu

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-10-14 Thread Robert C Jennings
I've nominated Precise as well based on the description indicating a recreate there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371591 Title: file not initialized to 0s under some c

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-10-10 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371591 Title: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: In P

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-10-10 Thread Chris J Arges
@petr-vmware, arvindkumar: Thanks for looking into this! I think your analysis makes more sense, because we'd expect the manually zeroing to actually work instead of causing corruption. What kind of testing and configurations have you done this on? Can you submit this patch upstream and referen

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-10-10 Thread Petr Vandrovec
Hi Chris, can you revert original patch which blacklist VMware for no good reason, and instead apply attached patch, or its equivalent? As explained above, bug affects ALL disks that do not support WRITE_SAME when used with stackable block devices, like LVM. Due to the bug Linux kernel stops

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-10-10 Thread Arvind Kumar
Hi Chris, This is Arvind Kumar from VMware. Recently the issue discussed in this bug was brought into VMware's notice. We looked at the patch (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/23/509) which was done to address the issue. Since the patch is done in mptsas driver, it addresses the issue only on lsilogic

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-10-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/precise-proposed/linux-lts-trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371591 Title: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare St

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-10-01 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 3.16.0-20.27 --- linux (3.16.0-20.27) utopic; urgency=low [ Tim Gardner ] * [Config] CONFIG_CXL=m * Release Tracking Bug - LP: #1376354 [ Andi Kleen ] * SAUCE: perf tools: Fix perf record as non root with kptr_restrict == 1

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-29 Thread Andy Whitcroft
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-25 Thread Chris J Arges
Patch here: http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-queue.git/commit/4089b71cc820a426d601283c92fcd4ffeb5139c2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371591 Title: file not initi

Re: [Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-24 Thread Bruce Lucas
This is what the customer reports. Ignoring the CD-ROM, this is slightly different from what I see on my VMWare Fusion installation, which reports "VMware, " (with a comma and a space). Presumably this is an insignificant difference? Bruce tail /sys/class/scsi_device/*/device/{vendor,model} ==> /s

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-24 Thread Chris J Arges
Bruce, The following should get some of the info needed: tail /sys/class/scsi_device/*/device/{vendor,model} -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371591 Title: file not initi

Re: [Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-24 Thread Bruce Lucas
Thanks Chris. I take it from the other thread that bubbling the setting up from the lower layer to the dm-* layer won't be possible. Do you know if this patch will fix it for ESXi as well as for the VMWare desktop products? I don't have access to ESXi, but the issue was originally reported to us

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-24 Thread Chris J Arges
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/23/509 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371591 Title: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare Status in “linux” package in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-22 Thread Bruce Lucas
I can confirm that this fixes the issue, both for the mongod repro and for the standalone repro attached to this report. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371591 Title: fil

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-22 Thread Chris J Arges
Can you try this build and see if it fixes the issue? Please install it into the guest VM: http://people.canonical.com/~arges/lp1371591/ Thanks, -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-22 Thread Chris J Arges
As a workaround, you can use IDE/SATA disks instead of SCSI (default), I'm not sure of performance implications, but the test cases passes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-22 Thread Chris J Arges
Ok my experiment doing the following (and I know launchpad will mangle my spacing...): diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c index 9b5b561..03ad981 100644 --- a/block/blk-lib.c +++ b/block/blk-lib.c @@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ int __blkdev_issue_zeroout(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-19 Thread Chris J Arges
As you mentioned in #10, blkdev_issue_zeroout (the function that prints 'WRITE SAME failed. Manually zeroing.'), still causes the test to show failures even if we should be manually zeroing out the block device when the hardware write_same fails. A test I could try is to short circuit BLKZEROOUT t

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-19 Thread Chris J Arges
The bisect resulted in the following: dc019b21fb92d620a3b52ccecc135ac968a7c7ec is the first bad commit commit dc019b21fb92d620a3b52ccecc135ac968a7c7ec Author: Mike Snitzer Date: Fri May 10 14:37:16 2013 +0100 dm table: fix write same support If device_not_write_same_capable() retu

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-19 Thread Chris J Arges
FWIW, I also tested this on a similar KVM instance using a SCSI disk device and installed Ubuntu using LVM, running the same test case does not result in the failure; even though write_same is enabled for those devices. ubuntu@lp1371591:~$ lsblk NAMEMAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-19 Thread Chris J Arges
The bisect resulted in the following: dc019b21fb92d620a3b52ccecc135ac968a7c7ec is the first bad commit commit dc019b21fb92d620a3b52ccecc135ac968a7c7ec Author: Mike Snitzer Date: Fri May 10 14:37:16 2013 +0100 dm table: fix write same support If device_not_write_same_capable() retu

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-19 Thread Chris J Arges
The 'regression' is between 3.9 and 3.10-rc1. I'll bisect between these tags to see where the issue is. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371591 Title: file not initialized

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-19 Thread Chris J Arges
@bruce-lucas OK I have reproduced this with the latest 3.17-rc kernel. So most likely this is an upstream issue. However I'll start testing previous versions to see if this is a regression between 3.10,3.11; this will help us zero in on the code changes that may have introduced this behavior.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-19 Thread Joseph Salisbury
** Tags added: kernel-da-key -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371591 Title: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-19 Thread Bruce Lucas
By the way, a couple more pieces of information that may be relevant: The problem is sensitive to the particular pattern of access to map0. If you remove either of the two writes (at 0x0 and 0x7000) the problem disappears, or if you change 0x7000 to a higher page it also disappears. We also obser

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-19 Thread Bruce Lucas
Awesome, thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371591 Title: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: In Progr

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-19 Thread Leann Ogasawara
** Information type changed from Public to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371591 Title: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare Statu

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-19 Thread Bruce Lucas
I accepted all the default settings when creating the VM (which for Fusion was 20 GB disk, 1 GB memory, single processor). On Fusion at least It is important to do the manual install: select installation method / more options / create a custom VM, mount the CD, set as boot device, bot up, go thro

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-19 Thread Chris J Arges
@bruce-lucas: Ok! I can reproduce this issue in VMWare Workstation. I'll start investigating more deeply. In my KVM instance previously I did not reproduce the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-19 Thread Chris J Arges
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1371591 Title: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on V

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-19 Thread Chris J Arges
When creating the VM, did you use the default settings, or was the hardware configuration changed at all? I.e. did you add extra processors, or just use 1? I'll look into my errors a bit more, getting VMWare Workstation setup; has this been only reproduced in VMWare Fusion? Also are there specific

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-19 Thread Bruce Lucas
20 GB should be more than enough. It should run the repro binary several times, using more disk space each time since it leaves the each run in place when it goes on to the next, and then get a failure from fallocate on the last one when the disk is filled up. I've attached a file showing a success

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-19 Thread Bruce Lucas
** Attachment added: "sample repro script output" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1371591/+attachment/4208971/+files/repro.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-19 Thread Chris J Arges
So are you sure 20GB is enough disk space for the VM? I tried in a KVM VM (just to try the reproducer) and I get 'No space left on device' errors from fallocate. In addition can you post the machine information someone in this bug so I can reproduce the exact setup on my end with vmware. Also to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1371591] Re: file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare

2014-09-19 Thread Bruce Lucas
** Summary changed: - FS Corruption with Ubuntu and VMWare + file not initialized to 0s under some conditions on VMWare ** Attachment added: "reproducer" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1371591/+attachment/4208902/+files/repro.tgz -- You received this bug notification b