[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: "Modaliases" field missing from debian control file

2016-12-10 Thread Mathew Hodson
** No longer affects: software-properties (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to b43-fwcutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1490212 Title: "Modaliases" field missing from debian control file Status in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: "Modaliases" field missing from debian control file

2015-12-19 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for b43-fwcutter (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: b43-fwcutter (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to b43-fwcutter in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: "Modaliases" field missing from debian control file

2015-10-20 Thread Martin Pitt
Unsubscribing sponsors for now. Let's please not change this until we have some clarity about the broadcom drivers. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to b43-fwcutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1490212 Title:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: "Modaliases" field missing from debian control file

2015-10-20 Thread Martin Pitt
Subscribing kernel team. Is this driver really something which we should offer to users via graphical means (and thus make it very easy)? It seems we've had three drivers (b43 with fwcutter, bcmwl, and now the relatively new bcma one). Which of these do we actually still support? We can't expect

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: "Modaliases" field missing from debian control file

2015-09-28 Thread Adam Smith
I can provide a patch for what I was saying in comment #16, but I think it is just a one liner in the two postrm files. I think it would be sensible for software-properties-gtk that the firmware is only deleted when the package is purged. This, modaliases in comment #2 and a reboot patch would

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: "Modaliases" field missing from debian control file

2015-09-26 Thread Adam Smith
Thanks Mathieu for your interest in this. If you use a patch similar to that in comment #2 then yes you could argue that is good enough to fix this (but it is much better to tell the user a reboot is needed too). However, it is not optimal. If you use modalises as in comment #13 then I think

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: "Modaliases" field missing from debian control file

2015-09-26 Thread Adam Smith
FYI, the reboot patch in comment #5 needs a slight adjustment because the commands are being run from a deleted directory/folder. I fixed this in the combined patch in comment #13. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: "Modaliases" field missing from debian control file

2015-09-25 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Adam, Generally this looks pretty good; but let's focus on just the modaliases issues for this bug. Can you file separate bug reports for the other problems? As for software-properties, I suspect there are probably no issues there; everything can be fixed by modifying just b43-fwcutter (by the

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: "Modaliases" field missing from debian control file

2015-09-02 Thread Adam Smith
Attached is a patch to make firmware-b43legacy-installer a dummy package. The patch also includes and improves all the other patches I've listed. The only problem I've found is due to the debconf value b43-fwcutter /install-unconditional and if this is true it now installs both lots of firmware.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: "Modaliases" field missing from debian control file

2015-09-02 Thread Adam Smith
The modalias file was generated from the aliases of the ssb and bcma modules. I suppose I should of taken out the pci ids listed as not being supported ( https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/b43 ). Oh well, for another day maybe, but I think all this effort is going to go to waste

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: "Modaliases" field missing from debian control file

2015-09-01 Thread Adam Smith
Reboot patch for bcmwl - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1491070 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to b43-fwcutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1490212 Title: "Modaliases" field missing

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: "Modaliases" field missing from debian control file

2015-09-01 Thread Adam Smith
While we're at it, lets delete the directory properly. ** Patch added: "remove.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/b43-fwcutter/+bug/1490212/+attachment/4455802/+files/remove.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: "Modaliases" field missing from debian control file

2015-09-01 Thread Adam Smith
A few more observations about my basic modaliases patch. the aliases beginning ssb/bcma are inferior. In software-properties-gtk the vendor and model are listed as unknown. Aliases beginning with pci can be generated from the ssb/bcma module aliases, but like I said above, I don't know how

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: "Modaliases" field missing from debian control file

2015-09-01 Thread Adam Smith
Mintdrivers (based on software-properties-gk) has a few interesting commits: There is one about firmware - https://github.com/linuxmint/mintdrivers/commit/c443ecd54310d7e521d57b214bcbfb7979fe4c66 One requesting an internet connection -

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: "Modaliases" field missing from debian control file

2015-09-01 Thread Adam Smith
Adding software-properties to the party since much of this involves them. ** Also affects: software-properties Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Project changed: software-properties => software-properties (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: "Modaliases" field missing from debian control file

2015-09-01 Thread Adam Smith
FYI for anyone requiring background information on all this, the support of cards and a list of PCI ID's is here https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/b43 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to b43-fwcutter in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: "Modaliases" field missing from debian control file

2015-09-01 Thread Adam Smith
The attached tells software-properties-gtk and the user that a reboot is needed after any changes to firmware. ** Patch added: "reboot.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/b43-fwcutter/+bug/1490212/+attachment/4455797/+files/reboot.patch -- You received this bug notification

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: "Modaliases" field missing from debian control file

2015-09-01 Thread Adam Smith
Back onto software-properties-gtk, the "this device is not working" is very unreliable. I'm not sure how it works this out, but it doesn't seem to account for the firmware being manually installed or through e.g. the linux-firmware-nonfree package which also contains b43 firmware. -- You

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: "Modaliases" field missing from debian control file

2015-08-31 Thread Adam Smith
Bug about the wl modaliases field: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1490713 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to b43-fwcutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1490212 Title: "Modaliases" field

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: "Modaliases" field missing from debian control file

2015-08-31 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
The attachment "Basic modaliases patch" seems to be a patch. If it isn't, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-reviewers, unsubscribe the team. [This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: Modaliases field missing from debian control file

2015-08-30 Thread Adam Smith
So I've looked into this some more and the theory is sound. There are, however, a few stumbling blocks. The first is software-properties-gtk is a bit rubbish because it doesn't provide much feedback about the package installation process. So if the firmware download fails then the

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1490212] Re: Modaliases field missing from debian control file

2015-08-30 Thread Adam Smith
The attached is a simple patch. The modaliases files could be generated automatically by the debian rules file. It would work better if there weren't seperate b43/b43legacy packages and we could use the same alias as wl does. ** Patch added: Basic modaliases patch