[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2019-10-03 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619918 Title: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-04-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 4.4.0-75.96 --- linux (4.4.0-75.96) xenial; urgency=low * linux: 4.4.0-75.96 -proposed tracker (LP: #1684441) * [Hyper-V] hv: util: move waiting for release to hv_utils_transport itself (LP: #1682561) - Drivers: hv: util: move

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-04-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 3.13.0-117.164 --- linux (3.13.0-117.164) trusty; urgency=low * linux: 3.13.0-117.164 -proposed tracker (LP: #1680733) * CVE-2017-6353 - sctp: deny peeloff operation on asocs with threads sleeping on it * CVE-2017-5986 - sctp:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-04-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 4.8.0-49.52 --- linux (4.8.0-49.52) yakkety; urgency=low * linux: 4.8.0-49.52 -proposed tracker (LP: #1684427) * [Hyper-V] hv: util: move waiting for release to hv_utils_transport itself (LP: #1682561) - Drivers: hv: util: move

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-04-02 Thread Rolf Leggewie
found another similar bug 1678645 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619918 Title: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error) Status in linux:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-04-01 Thread Rolf Leggewie
@Po-Hsu So, I did the work, yet you didn't act on it in time. Great! Just confirms the impression of the Ubuntu kernel team I've had for a while. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-03-24 Thread Rolf Leggewie
I'm happy to report that with kernel linux- image-3.13.0-114-generic:amd64 and e2fsprogs:i386 on trusty the original issue with lsattr is fixed and there are no regressions with "btrfs fi show" or "btrfs sub snapshot". For verification of the other kernels, is it sufficient for me to install

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-03-24 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Po-Hsu Lin, I understand the kernel team is busy, but frankly, I don't understand why I should be doing all the work when it wasn't me introducing the regression. There are clear steps provided in how to verify the problem and the fix. I don't think it should be beyond those who get paid for

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-03-24 Thread Po-Hsu Lin
Hello Rolf, Our "Bug verification & Regression testing" slot for the current SRU cycle [1] is between 19-Mar - 31-Mar So it would be great if we can have your help before 31-Mar Thank you very much!! [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Newsletter/2017-03-21 -- You received this bug

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-03-21 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Thank you for releasing the test kernels. I will likely need a bit more time for testing than the allotted five days as the internet in this part of the world is inadequate. Please confirm the extension. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-03-21 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed- yakkety' to 'verification-done-yakkety'. If the problem still exists, change the tag

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-03-21 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed- xenial' to 'verification-done-xenial'. If the problem still exists, change the tag

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-03-21 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed- trusty' to 'verification-done-trusty'. If the problem still exists, change the tag

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-03-15 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619918 Title: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-03-14 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Yakkety) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619918 Title: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-03-14 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619918 Title: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-02-28 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Thanks for all the help and testing, Rolf! I'll submit an SRU request to have this patch in all Ubuntu releases. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Zesty) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-02-27 Thread Rolf Leggewie
I'm happy to report that with the latest kernel from http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1619918/ the original issue with lsattr is fixed and there are no regressions with "btrfs fi show" or "btrfs sub snapshot". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-02-23 Thread Joseph Salisbury
This fix from Jeff has landed in mainline and has been cc'd to stable: commit 2a362249187a8d0f6d942d6e1d763d150a296f47 Author: Jeff Mahoney Date: Mon Feb 6 19:39:09 2017 -0500 btrfs: fix btrfs_compat_ioctl failures on non-compat ioctls I built a Xenial test kernel with

Re: [Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-02-07 Thread Rolf Leggewie
On 08.02.2017 04:29, Joseph Salisbury wrote: > There should be a fix coming from upstream shortly: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/2/6/969 Great! Thanks. ** No longer affects: linux (Ubuntu Vivid) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-02-07 Thread Joseph Salisbury
There should be a fix coming from upstream shortly: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/2/6/969 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619918 Title: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-02-02 Thread Rolf Leggewie
How many more times will I have to do silly tests with predictable results before this regression is finally fixed, Joseph? Just asking. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-01-19 Thread Rolf Leggewie
On 07.01.2017 01:38, Luke-Jr wrote: > On Friday, January 06, 2017 5:22:34 PM Joseph Salisbury wrote: >> btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in >> btrfs_ioctl >> >> However, this commit introduced a new regression. With this commit >> applied, "btrfs fi show" no

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-01-06 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Hi Luke, A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. This bug was fixed by the following commit in v4.7-rc1: commit 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 Author: Luke Dashjr Date: Thu Oct 29 08:22:21 2015 + btrfs: bugfix: handle

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-01-06 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Thanks for the testing feedback, Rolf. I will ping upstream and the patch Author to get feed back on the next steps. There may be another fix for the new bug, or we may just want to revert it. In the meantime, can you test the current 4.10-rc2 mainline kernel, to confirm the new bug still

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2017-01-05 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Thank you for providing the kernel. Here are the (as expected results) results: - lsattr bug is back - "btrfs fi show" works - snapshotting works $ uname -a Linux 1001P 4.4.0-53-generic #74~lp1619918Commit4c63c2454eReverted SMP Tue Dec 13 18:27:31 UT x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- You

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-12-13 Thread Joseph Salisbury
I built a Xenial test kernel with commit 4c63c2454e reverted. The test kernel can be downloaded from: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1619918 Can you test this kernel and see if it resolves the snapshotting bug? It will probably re-introduce the original bug. We can decide the next

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-12-13 Thread Rolf Leggewie
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #190221 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190221 ** Also affects: kernel via http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190221 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-12-13 Thread Rolf Leggewie
adding to comment #36: mainline kernel 4.9.0-040900rc7-generic #201611271731 does - not have the problem with lsattr - not have the problem with "btrfs fi show" - INDEED have the problem with snapshotting -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-12-13 Thread Rolf Leggewie
The original bug is just an annoyance in my opinion and a cornercase as well. From what I can tell it makes it impossible to get extended attributes for any file, but only if you have a mixed i386/amd64 environment, run the amd64 kernel while having i386 e2fsprogs. The impact of that should be

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-12-13 Thread Rolf Leggewie
IOW, I think backing out the patch and reintroducing the original problem is better than keeping the regression the fix introduced to stick around. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-12-13 Thread Rolf Leggewie
mainline amd64 kernel 4.9.0-040900rc7-generic #201611271731 does not have the problem with lsattr "btrfs fi show". It DOES have the problem with creating a btrfs snapshot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-12-05 Thread Joseph Salisbury
If we back out the patch, your original bug will return, correct? Was the original bug a regression? If it was, we can bisect to find the commit that caused the original bug and then back out that commit and commit 4c63c2454eff996. The alternative is to perform the testing in comment #33, and

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-12-04 Thread Rolf Leggewie
You know, it's getting to be somewhat annoying. I have very limited bandwidth here. Why don't you back out the patch already until a proper solution is found? I will happily continue to test but as you can see it does take me some time. The test case is pretty clear, why can you not be

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-11-29 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Can you see if this new regression is also occurring with the current mainline kernel: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.9-rc7/ Commit 4c63c2454eff996 fixes the original bug, but introduced a new bug. Testing mainline will tell us if the new bug is already fixed in mainline. If

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-11-25 Thread Rolf Leggewie
I've downloaded the kernel from http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1619918/xenial/ and https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-security- team/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+build/11038082 now. Both kernels have the same problem/regression (verified with "sudo btrfs fi show /") -- You received this

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-11-09 Thread Joseph Salisbury
If possible, it would be great if you could test the xenial kernel posted in comment #22 as well as the Yakkety kernel, which is available from: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-security- team/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+build/11038082 -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-11-08 Thread Rolf Leggewie
I apologize for the delayed response, I was travelling. Yes, the error message is the same as for the original report. Then it was triggered by a call to lsattr, now by calling btrfs to create a snapshot. The released kernels do not have the originally reported problem with lsattr but regressed

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-11-02 Thread Joseph Salisbury
One additional question. Are you only seeing this new regression on Trusty, or does it also happen on Xenial? Would it be possible for you to maybe test the Xenial and Yakkety kernels if it is unknown? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-11-02 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Also, using the 32 bit tools package with a 64 bit kernel, should be fine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619918 Title: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-11-02 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Thanks for testing, Rolf. The error message from the regression appears to be the same error message you were getting when you originally opened the bug, is that correct? You are just now getting it with other btrfs operations, but the original bug is fixed? -- You received this bug

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-11-02 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Thank you for providing the test kernel. Unfortunately, it does not fix the regression. I installed the trusty kernel. I did not install the linux-tools-* packages as it would have uninstalled the trusty version of linux-tools-generic. I have the i386 version of that package installed but I

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-11-01 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Please ignore comment #24. Pasted in wrong bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619918 Title: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-11-01 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Did this issue start happening after an update/upgrade? Was there a prior kernel version where you were not having this particular problem? Would it be possible for you to test the latest upstream kernel? Refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Please test the latest v4.9

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-11-01 Thread Joseph Salisbury
I also built a Trusty test kernel. It can be downloaded from: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1619918/trusty Can you also give this one a test? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-11-01 Thread Joseph Salisbury
There is a Xenial test kernel with the original fix and a pick of commit c5868f8. Can you give this test kernel a test? It can be downloaded from: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1619918/xenial/ I'm in the process of building a Trusty test kernel as well and will post a link to it when

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-11-01 Thread Joseph Salisbury
This appears to be the same error message you were getting when you originally opened the bug, is that correct? You are just now getting it with other btrfs operations now? There may be some additional commits that are needed. I'll build a Xenial and Trusty test kernel for testing. ** Changed

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-11-01 Thread Joseph Salisbury
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: Tim Gardner (timg-tpi) => Joseph Salisbury (jsalisbury) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-11-01 Thread Brad Figg
@rolf, I apologize for this getting released. I/we care very much about regressions. I take full responsibility for this happening. In the future if there is an issue in verifying a fix, changing the verification-needed- tag to verification-failed- would help. We will get this addressed asap.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-10-31 Thread Rolf Leggewie
The "I don't give a sh.."-attitude displayed here towards a regression is shocking. Why do I even bother to test? The regression is apparently much more severe to obot. I can no longer take a snapshot of my btrfs filesystem. $ sudo btrfs sub snapshot -r /mnt/LTS/@home/

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-10-25 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Brad, how can you set this to verified and release when that introduces a pretty severe regression? OMG!! ** Tags added: regression-update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-10-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 3.13.0-98.145 --- linux (3.13.0-98.145) trusty; urgency=low * Fix GRO recursion overflow for tunneling protocols (LP: #1631287) - tunnels: Don't apply GRO to multiple layers of encapsulation. * CVE-2016-7039 - SAUCE: net: add

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-10-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 3.19.0-71.79 --- linux (3.19.0-71.79) vivid; urgency=low * Fix GRO recursion overflow for tunneling protocols (LP: #1631287) - tunnels: Don't apply GRO to multiple layers of encapsulation. - gro: Allow tunnel stacking in the case of

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-10-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 3.19.0-71.79 --- linux (3.19.0-71.79) vivid; urgency=low * Fix GRO recursion overflow for tunneling protocols (LP: #1631287) - tunnels: Don't apply GRO to multiple layers of encapsulation. - gro: Allow tunnel stacking in the case of

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-10-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 4.4.0-42.62 --- linux (4.4.0-42.62) xenial; urgency=low * Fix GRO recursion overflow for tunneling protocols (LP: #1631287) - tunnels: Don't apply GRO to multiple layers of encapsulation. - gro: Allow tunnel stacking in the case of

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-10-05 Thread Brad Figg
** Tags removed: verification-needed-vivid verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done-vivid verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619918

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-10-02 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Yes, regression from -96 to -97 verified on trusty. ** Tags removed: verification-done-trusty ** Tags added: regression-proposed verification-needed-trusty ** Tags removed: verification-needed-trusty ** Tags added: verification-done-trusty ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: Fix

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-10-01 Thread Rolf Leggewie
I think there might be a regression with this kernel. "sudo btrfs fi show" no longer works and only puts out "Btrfs v3.12" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619918 Title:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-10-01 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Thanks. This works well in trusty. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-trusty ** Tags added: verification-done-trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619918 Title:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-09-26 Thread Brad Figg
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed- trusty' to 'verification-done-trusty'. If verification is not done by 5 working days from

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-09-26 Thread Brad Figg
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed- vivid' to 'verification-done-vivid'. If verification is not done by 5 working days from

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-09-26 Thread Brad Figg
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed- xenial' to 'verification-done-xenial'. If verification is not done by 5 working days from

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-09-19 Thread Kamal Mostafa
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Vivid) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619918 Title: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-09-19 Thread Kamal Mostafa
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-09-06 Thread Tim Gardner
Test kernel at http://people.canonical.com/~rtg/lsattr-lp1619918/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619918 Title: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-09-06 Thread Tim Gardner
Commit 02da2d72174c61988eb4456b53f405e3ebdebce4 merged in v4.7 ** Also affects: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance:

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-09-06 Thread Tim Gardner
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2016-September/079897.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619918 Title: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-09-03 Thread Theodore Ts'o
Rolf, can you collect the requested logs? I think this is pointless since it's pretty clear that there's a commit that just needs to be backported, but that's between use and the Ubuntu Kernel team to figure out. Or you can just use the upstream 4.7 kernel. :-) -- You received this bug

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1619918] Re: lsattr 32bit does not work on 64bit kernel (Inappropriate ioctl error)

2016-09-03 Thread Theodore Ts'o
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.