subject:"\[Kernel\-packages\] \[Bug 1672953\] Re\: ISST\-LTE\:pVM\:roselp4\:ubuntu16.04.2\: number of numa_miss and numa

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1672953] Re: ISST-LTE:pVM:roselp4:ubuntu16.04.2: number of numa_miss and numa_foreign wrong in numastat

2019-07-24 Thread Brad Figg

** Tags added: cscc

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672953

Title:
  ISST-LTE:pVM:roselp4:ubuntu16.04.2: number of numa_miss and
  numa_foreign wrong in numastat

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Ping Tian Han  - 2016-12-07 19:14:40 ==
  +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #148750 +++

  On roselp4, we got numastat as this:

  % sudo numastat  
 node0   node1
  numa_hit   0   0
  numa_miss  0  292054
  numa_foreign   0  292054
  interleave_hit 04100
  local_node 0   0
  other_node 0   0
  % uname -a   
  Linux roselp4 4.8.0-30-generic #32~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri Dec 2 03:43:52 UTC 
2016 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux
  % 

  
  The number of numa_miss and numa_foreign looks wrong, because the manual says 
that "Each numa_miss has a numa_foreign on another node." and "Each 
numa_foreign has a numa_miss on another node." But the numbers of node0 are all 
zeros.

  
  == Comment: #18 - JIA HE  - 2017-02-20 00:24:26 ==
  hi, Ping Tian Han
  Please see the test result, is it what you expected?
  before the patches
  root@seedlp1:~# numastat
 node0   node2   node3
  numa_hit   0   0   0
  numa_miss  0  3525215466
  numa_foreign   0  3525215466
  interleave_hit 056285402
  local_node 0   0   0
  other_node 0   0   0
  root@seedlp1:~# 

  after the patches
  xinhui locking
  root@seedlp1:/boot# numastat
 node0   node2   node3
  numa_hit   0  2387664837
  numa_miss  0   0   0
  numa_foreign   0   0   0
  interleave_hit 048884777
  local_node 0   0   0
  other_node 0  2387664837

  == Comment: #19 - JIA HE  - 2017-02-20 00:28:14 ==
  New kernel is at 
http://kernel.stglabs.ibm.com/~hejianet/bug149763/linux-image-4.8.0-37-generic_4.8.0-37.39_ppc64el.deb

  md5: f3a57af05f0945f10b9d2841844f0fe4  linux-
  image-4.8.0-37-generic_4.8.0-37.39bug149763_ppc64el.deb

  == Comment: #20 - Ping Tian Han  - 2017-02-20 00:57:30 ==
  (In reply to comment #18)
  > hi, Ping Tian Han
  > Please see the test result, is it what you expected?
  > before the patches
  > root@seedlp1:~# numastat
  >node0   node2   node3
  > numa_hit   0   0   0
  > numa_miss  0  3525215466
  > numa_foreign   0  3525215466
  > interleave_hit 056285402
  > local_node 0   0   0
  > other_node 0   0   0
  > root@seedlp1:~# 
  > 
  > after the patches
  > xinhui locking
  > root@seedlp1:/boot# numastat
  >node0   node2   node3
  > numa_hit   0  2387664837
  > numa_miss  0   0   0
  > numa_foreign   0   0   0
  > interleave_hit 048884777
  > local_node 0   0   0
  > other_node 0  2387664837

  This looks good to me. Thanks.

  Please cherry pick the  patches below

  
  
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2df26639e708a88dcc22171949da638a9998f3bc

  
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=41b6167e8f746b475668f1da78599fc4284f18db

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1672953/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1672953] Re: ISST-LTE:pVM:roselp4:ubuntu16.04.2: number of numa_miss and numa_foreign wrong in numastat

2017-04-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker

This bug was fixed in the package linux - 4.8.0-49.52

---
linux (4.8.0-49.52) yakkety; urgency=low

  * linux: 4.8.0-49.52 -proposed tracker (LP: #1684427)

  * [Hyper-V] hv: util: move waiting for release to hv_utils_transport itself
(LP: #1682561)
- Drivers: hv: util: move waiting for release to hv_utils_transport itself

linux (4.8.0-48.51) yakkety; urgency=low

  * linux: 4.8.0-48.51 -proposed tracker (LP: #1682034)

  * [Hyper-V] hv: vmbus: Raise retry/wait limits in vmbus_post_msg()
(LP: #1681893)
- Drivers: hv: vmbus: Raise retry/wait limits in vmbus_post_msg()

linux (4.8.0-47.50) yakkety; urgency=low

  * linux: 4.8.0-47.50 -proposed tracker (LP: #1679678)

  * CVE-2017-6353
- sctp: deny peeloff operation on asocs with threads sleeping on it

  * CVE-2017-5986
- sctp: avoid BUG_ON on sctp_wait_for_sndbuf

  * vfat: missing iso8859-1 charset (LP: #1677230)
- [Config] NLS_ISO8859_1=y

  * [Hyper-V] pci-hyperv: Use device serial number as PCI domain (LP: #1667527)
- net/mlx4_core: Use cq quota in SRIOV when creating completion EQs

  * Regression: KVM modules should be on main kernel package (LP: #1678099)
- [Config] powerpc: Add kvm-hv and kvm-pr to the generic inclusion list

  * linux-lts-xenial 4.4.0-63.84~14.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-lts-xenial
4.4.0-63.84~14.04.2 (LP: #1664912)
- SAUCE: apparmor: fix link auditing failure due to, uninitialized var

  * regession tests failing after stackprofile test is run (LP: #1661030)
- SAUCE: fix regression with domain change in complain mode

  * Permission denied and inconsistent behavior in complain mode with 'ip netns
list' command (LP: #1648903)
- SAUCE: fix regression with domain change in complain mode

  * unexpected errno=13 and disconnected path when trying to open /proc/1/ns/mnt
from a unshared mount namespace (LP: #1656121)
- SAUCE: apparmor: null profiles should inherit parent control flags

  * apparmor refcount leak of profile namespace when removing profiles
(LP: #1660849)
- SAUCE: apparmor: fix ns ref count link when removing profiles from policy

  * tor in lxd: apparmor="DENIED" operation="change_onexec"
namespace="root//CONTAINERNAME_" profile="unconfined"
name="system_tor" (LP: #1648143)
- SAUCE: apparmor: Fix no_new_privs blocking change_onexec when using 
stacked
  namespaces

  * apparmor oops in bind_mnt when dev_path lookup fails (LP: #1660840)
- SAUCE: apparmor: fix oops in bind_mnt when dev_path lookup fails

  * apparmor  auditing denied access of special apparmor .null fi\ le
(LP: #1660836)
- SAUCE: apparmor: Don't audit denied access of special apparmor .null file

  * apparmor label leak when new label is unused (LP: #1660834)
- SAUCE: apparmor: fix label leak when new label is unused

  * apparmor reference count bug in label_merge_insert() (LP: #1660833)
- SAUCE: apparmor: fix reference count bug in label_merge_insert()

  * apparmor's raw_data file in securityfs is sometimes truncated (LP: #1638996)
- SAUCE: apparmor: fix replacement race in reading rawdata

  * unix domain socket cross permission check failing with nested namespaces
(LP: #1660832)
- SAUCE: apparmor: fix cross ns perm of unix domain sockets

  * [Hyper-V][Mellanox] net/mlx4_core: Avoid delays during VF driver device
shutdown (LP: #1672785)
- Revert "net/mlx4_en: Avoid unregister_netdev at shutdown flow"
- net/mlx4_core: Avoid delays during VF driver device shutdown

  * Update ENA driver to 1.1.2 from net-next (LP: #1664312)
- net: ena: Remove unnecessary pci_set_drvdata()
- net: ena: Fix error return code in ena_device_init()
- net: ena: change the return type of ena_set_push_mode() to be void.
- net: ena: use setup_timer() and mod_timer()
- net/ena: remove ntuple filter support from device feature list
- net/ena: fix queues number calculation
- net/ena: fix ethtool RSS flow configuration
- net/ena: fix RSS default hash configuration
- net/ena: fix NULL dereference when removing the driver after device reset
  failed
- net/ena: refactor ena_get_stats64 to be atomic context safe
- net/ena: fix potential access to freed memory during device reset
- net/ena: use READ_ONCE to access completion descriptors
- net/ena: reduce the severity of ena printouts
- net/ena: change driver's default timeouts
- net/ena: change condition for host attribute configuration
- net/ena: update driver version to 1.1.2

  * ISST-LTE:pVM:roselp4:ubuntu16.04.2: number of numa_miss and numa_foreign
wrong in numastat (LP: #1672953)
- mm: fix remote numa hits statistics
- mm: get rid of __GFP_OTHER_NODE

  * Using an NVMe drive causes huge power drain (LP: #1664602)
- nvme/scsi: Remove power management support
- nvme: Pass pointers, not dma addresses, to nvme_get/set_features()
- nvme: introduce struct nvme_request
- nvme: Add a quirk

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1672953] Re: ISST-LTE:pVM:roselp4:ubuntu16.04.2: number of numa_miss and numa_foreign wrong in numastat

2017-04-13 Thread Kleber Sacilotto de Souza

This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves
the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the
results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-
yakkety' to 'verification-done-yakkety'. If the problem still exists,
change the tag 'verification-needed-yakkety' to 'verification-failed-
yakkety'.

If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.

See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: verification-needed-yakkety

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672953

Title:
  ISST-LTE:pVM:roselp4:ubuntu16.04.2: number of numa_miss and
  numa_foreign wrong in numastat

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in aa-series:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Ping Tian Han  - 2016-12-07 19:14:40 ==
  +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #148750 +++

  On roselp4, we got numastat as this:

  % sudo numastat  
 node0   node1
  numa_hit   0   0
  numa_miss  0  292054
  numa_foreign   0  292054
  interleave_hit 04100
  local_node 0   0
  other_node 0   0
  % uname -a   
  Linux roselp4 4.8.0-30-generic #32~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri Dec 2 03:43:52 UTC 
2016 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux
  % 

  
  The number of numa_miss and numa_foreign looks wrong, because the manual says 
that "Each numa_miss has a numa_foreign on another node." and "Each 
numa_foreign has a numa_miss on another node." But the numbers of node0 are all 
zeros.

  
  == Comment: #18 - JIA HE  - 2017-02-20 00:24:26 ==
  hi, Ping Tian Han
  Please see the test result, is it what you expected?
  before the patches
  root@seedlp1:~# numastat
 node0   node2   node3
  numa_hit   0   0   0
  numa_miss  0  3525215466
  numa_foreign   0  3525215466
  interleave_hit 056285402
  local_node 0   0   0
  other_node 0   0   0
  root@seedlp1:~# 

  after the patches
  xinhui locking
  root@seedlp1:/boot# numastat
 node0   node2   node3
  numa_hit   0  2387664837
  numa_miss  0   0   0
  numa_foreign   0   0   0
  interleave_hit 048884777
  local_node 0   0   0
  other_node 0  2387664837

  == Comment: #19 - JIA HE  - 2017-02-20 00:28:14 ==
  New kernel is at 
http://kernel.stglabs.ibm.com/~hejianet/bug149763/linux-image-4.8.0-37-generic_4.8.0-37.39_ppc64el.deb

  md5: f3a57af05f0945f10b9d2841844f0fe4  linux-
  image-4.8.0-37-generic_4.8.0-37.39bug149763_ppc64el.deb

  == Comment: #20 - Ping Tian Han  - 2017-02-20 00:57:30 ==
  (In reply to comment #18)
  > hi, Ping Tian Han
  > Please see the test result, is it what you expected?
  > before the patches
  > root@seedlp1:~# numastat
  >node0   node2   node3
  > numa_hit   0   0   0
  > numa_miss  0  3525215466
  > numa_foreign   0  3525215466
  > interleave_hit 056285402
  > local_node 0   0   0
  > other_node 0   0   0
  > root@seedlp1:~# 
  > 
  > after the patches
  > xinhui locking
  > root@seedlp1:/boot# numastat
  >node0   node2   node3
  > numa_hit   0  2387664837
  > numa_miss  0   0   0
  > numa_foreign   0   0   0
  > interleave_hit 048884777
  > local_node 0   0   0
  > other_node 0  2387664837

  This looks good to me. Thanks.

  Please cherry

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1672953] Re: ISST-LTE:pVM:roselp4:ubuntu16.04.2: number of numa_miss and numa_foreign wrong in numastat

2017-04-04 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Yakkety)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672953

Title:
  ISST-LTE:pVM:roselp4:ubuntu16.04.2: number of numa_miss and
  numa_foreign wrong in numastat

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in aa-series:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Ping Tian Han  - 2016-12-07 19:14:40 ==
  +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #148750 +++

  On roselp4, we got numastat as this:

  % sudo numastat  
 node0   node1
  numa_hit   0   0
  numa_miss  0  292054
  numa_foreign   0  292054
  interleave_hit 04100
  local_node 0   0
  other_node 0   0
  % uname -a   
  Linux roselp4 4.8.0-30-generic #32~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri Dec 2 03:43:52 UTC 
2016 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux
  % 

  
  The number of numa_miss and numa_foreign looks wrong, because the manual says 
that "Each numa_miss has a numa_foreign on another node." and "Each 
numa_foreign has a numa_miss on another node." But the numbers of node0 are all 
zeros.

  
  == Comment: #18 - JIA HE  - 2017-02-20 00:24:26 ==
  hi, Ping Tian Han
  Please see the test result, is it what you expected?
  before the patches
  root@seedlp1:~# numastat
 node0   node2   node3
  numa_hit   0   0   0
  numa_miss  0  3525215466
  numa_foreign   0  3525215466
  interleave_hit 056285402
  local_node 0   0   0
  other_node 0   0   0
  root@seedlp1:~# 

  after the patches
  xinhui locking
  root@seedlp1:/boot# numastat
 node0   node2   node3
  numa_hit   0  2387664837
  numa_miss  0   0   0
  numa_foreign   0   0   0
  interleave_hit 048884777
  local_node 0   0   0
  other_node 0  2387664837

  == Comment: #19 - JIA HE  - 2017-02-20 00:28:14 ==
  New kernel is at 
http://kernel.stglabs.ibm.com/~hejianet/bug149763/linux-image-4.8.0-37-generic_4.8.0-37.39_ppc64el.deb

  md5: f3a57af05f0945f10b9d2841844f0fe4  linux-
  image-4.8.0-37-generic_4.8.0-37.39bug149763_ppc64el.deb

  == Comment: #20 - Ping Tian Han  - 2017-02-20 00:57:30 ==
  (In reply to comment #18)
  > hi, Ping Tian Han
  > Please see the test result, is it what you expected?
  > before the patches
  > root@seedlp1:~# numastat
  >node0   node2   node3
  > numa_hit   0   0   0
  > numa_miss  0  3525215466
  > numa_foreign   0  3525215466
  > interleave_hit 056285402
  > local_node 0   0   0
  > other_node 0   0   0
  > root@seedlp1:~# 
  > 
  > after the patches
  > xinhui locking
  > root@seedlp1:/boot# numastat
  >node0   node2   node3
  > numa_hit   0  2387664837
  > numa_miss  0   0   0
  > numa_foreign   0   0   0
  > interleave_hit 048884777
  > local_node 0   0   0
  > other_node 0  2387664837

  This looks good to me. Thanks.

  Please cherry pick the  patches below

  
  
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2df26639e708a88dcc22171949da638a9998f3bc

  
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=41b6167e8f746b475668f1da78599fc4284f18db

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1672953/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   :

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1672953] Re: ISST-LTE:pVM:roselp4:ubuntu16.04.2: number of numa_miss and numa_foreign wrong in numastat

2017-03-17 Thread Tim Gardner

https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2017-March/083041.html

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672953

Title:
  ISST-LTE:pVM:roselp4:ubuntu16.04.2: number of numa_miss and
  numa_foreign wrong in numastat

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Yakkety:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in aa-series:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Ping Tian Han  - 2016-12-07 19:14:40 ==
  +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #148750 +++

  On roselp4, we got numastat as this:

  % sudo numastat  
 node0   node1
  numa_hit   0   0
  numa_miss  0  292054
  numa_foreign   0  292054
  interleave_hit 04100
  local_node 0   0
  other_node 0   0
  % uname -a   
  Linux roselp4 4.8.0-30-generic #32~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri Dec 2 03:43:52 UTC 
2016 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux
  % 

  
  The number of numa_miss and numa_foreign looks wrong, because the manual says 
that "Each numa_miss has a numa_foreign on another node." and "Each 
numa_foreign has a numa_miss on another node." But the numbers of node0 are all 
zeros.

  
  == Comment: #18 - JIA HE  - 2017-02-20 00:24:26 ==
  hi, Ping Tian Han
  Please see the test result, is it what you expected?
  before the patches
  root@seedlp1:~# numastat
 node0   node2   node3
  numa_hit   0   0   0
  numa_miss  0  3525215466
  numa_foreign   0  3525215466
  interleave_hit 056285402
  local_node 0   0   0
  other_node 0   0   0
  root@seedlp1:~# 

  after the patches
  xinhui locking
  root@seedlp1:/boot# numastat
 node0   node2   node3
  numa_hit   0  2387664837
  numa_miss  0   0   0
  numa_foreign   0   0   0
  interleave_hit 048884777
  local_node 0   0   0
  other_node 0  2387664837

  == Comment: #19 - JIA HE  - 2017-02-20 00:28:14 ==
  New kernel is at 
http://kernel.stglabs.ibm.com/~hejianet/bug149763/linux-image-4.8.0-37-generic_4.8.0-37.39_ppc64el.deb

  md5: f3a57af05f0945f10b9d2841844f0fe4  linux-
  image-4.8.0-37-generic_4.8.0-37.39bug149763_ppc64el.deb

  == Comment: #20 - Ping Tian Han  - 2017-02-20 00:57:30 ==
  (In reply to comment #18)
  > hi, Ping Tian Han
  > Please see the test result, is it what you expected?
  > before the patches
  > root@seedlp1:~# numastat
  >node0   node2   node3
  > numa_hit   0   0   0
  > numa_miss  0  3525215466
  > numa_foreign   0  3525215466
  > interleave_hit 056285402
  > local_node 0   0   0
  > other_node 0   0   0
  > root@seedlp1:~# 
  > 
  > after the patches
  > xinhui locking
  > root@seedlp1:/boot# numastat
  >node0   node2   node3
  > numa_hit   0  2387664837
  > numa_miss  0   0   0
  > numa_foreign   0   0   0
  > interleave_hit 048884777
  > local_node 0   0   0
  > other_node 0  2387664837

  This looks good to me. Thanks.

  Please cherry pick the  patches below

  
  
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2df26639e708a88dcc22171949da638a9998f3bc

  
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=41b6167e8f746b475668f1da78599fc4284f18db

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1672953/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   :

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1672953] Re: ISST-LTE:pVM:roselp4:ubuntu16.04.2: number of numa_miss and numa_foreign wrong in numastat

2017-03-17 Thread Tim Gardner

** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Yakkety)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Aa-series)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Zesty)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Aa-series)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Zesty)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Yakkety)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Yakkety)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Tim Gardner (timg-tpi)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672953

Title:
  ISST-LTE:pVM:roselp4:ubuntu16.04.2: number of numa_miss and
  numa_foreign wrong in numastat

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Yakkety:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in aa-series:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Ping Tian Han  - 2016-12-07 19:14:40 ==
  +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #148750 +++

  On roselp4, we got numastat as this:

  % sudo numastat  
 node0   node1
  numa_hit   0   0
  numa_miss  0  292054
  numa_foreign   0  292054
  interleave_hit 04100
  local_node 0   0
  other_node 0   0
  % uname -a   
  Linux roselp4 4.8.0-30-generic #32~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri Dec 2 03:43:52 UTC 
2016 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux
  % 

  
  The number of numa_miss and numa_foreign looks wrong, because the manual says 
that "Each numa_miss has a numa_foreign on another node." and "Each 
numa_foreign has a numa_miss on another node." But the numbers of node0 are all 
zeros.

  
  == Comment: #18 - JIA HE  - 2017-02-20 00:24:26 ==
  hi, Ping Tian Han
  Please see the test result, is it what you expected?
  before the patches
  root@seedlp1:~# numastat
 node0   node2   node3
  numa_hit   0   0   0
  numa_miss  0  3525215466
  numa_foreign   0  3525215466
  interleave_hit 056285402
  local_node 0   0   0
  other_node 0   0   0
  root@seedlp1:~# 

  after the patches
  xinhui locking
  root@seedlp1:/boot# numastat
 node0   node2   node3
  numa_hit   0  2387664837
  numa_miss  0   0   0
  numa_foreign   0   0   0
  interleave_hit 048884777
  local_node 0   0   0
  other_node 0  2387664837

  == Comment: #19 - JIA HE  - 2017-02-20 00:28:14 ==
  New kernel is at 
http://kernel.stglabs.ibm.com/~hejianet/bug149763/linux-image-4.8.0-37-generic_4.8.0-37.39_ppc64el.deb

  md5: f3a57af05f0945f10b9d2841844f0fe4  linux-
  image-4.8.0-37-generic_4.8.0-37.39bug149763_ppc64el.deb

  == Comment: #20 - Ping Tian Han  - 2017-02-20 00:57:30 ==
  (In reply to comment #18)
  > hi, Ping Tian Han
  > Please see the test result, is it what you expected?
  > before the patches
  > root@seedlp1:~# numastat
  >node0   node2   node3
  > numa_hit   0   0   0
  > numa_miss  0  3525215466
  > numa_foreign   0  3525215466
  > interleave_hit 056285402
  > local_node 0   0   0
  > other_node 0   0   0
  > root@seedlp1:~# 
  > 
  > after the patches
  > xinhui locking
  > root@seedlp1:/boot# numastat
  >node0   node2   node3
  > numa_hit   0  2387664837
  > numa_miss  0   0   0
  > numa_foreign   0   0   0
  > interleave_hit 048884777
  > local_node 0   0   0
  > other_node 0  2387664837

  This looks good to me. Thanks.

  Please cherry pick the  patches below

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1672953] Re: ISST-LTE:pVM:roselp4:ubuntu16.04.2: number of numa_miss and numa_foreign wrong in numastat

2017-03-15 Thread Brian Murray

** Package changed: ubuntu => linux (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672953

Title:
  ISST-LTE:pVM:roselp4:ubuntu16.04.2: number of numa_miss and
  numa_foreign wrong in numastat

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  == Comment: #0 - Ping Tian Han  - 2016-12-07 19:14:40 ==
  +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #148750 +++

  On roselp4, we got numastat as this:

  % sudo numastat  
 node0   node1
  numa_hit   0   0
  numa_miss  0  292054
  numa_foreign   0  292054
  interleave_hit 04100
  local_node 0   0
  other_node 0   0
  % uname -a   
  Linux roselp4 4.8.0-30-generic #32~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri Dec 2 03:43:52 UTC 
2016 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux
  % 

  
  The number of numa_miss and numa_foreign looks wrong, because the manual says 
that "Each numa_miss has a numa_foreign on another node." and "Each 
numa_foreign has a numa_miss on another node." But the numbers of node0 are all 
zeros.

  
  == Comment: #18 - JIA HE  - 2017-02-20 00:24:26 ==
  hi, Ping Tian Han
  Please see the test result, is it what you expected?
  before the patches
  root@seedlp1:~# numastat
 node0   node2   node3
  numa_hit   0   0   0
  numa_miss  0  3525215466
  numa_foreign   0  3525215466
  interleave_hit 056285402
  local_node 0   0   0
  other_node 0   0   0
  root@seedlp1:~# 

  after the patches
  xinhui locking
  root@seedlp1:/boot# numastat
 node0   node2   node3
  numa_hit   0  2387664837
  numa_miss  0   0   0
  numa_foreign   0   0   0
  interleave_hit 048884777
  local_node 0   0   0
  other_node 0  2387664837

  == Comment: #19 - JIA HE  - 2017-02-20 00:28:14 ==
  New kernel is at 
http://kernel.stglabs.ibm.com/~hejianet/bug149763/linux-image-4.8.0-37-generic_4.8.0-37.39_ppc64el.deb

  md5: f3a57af05f0945f10b9d2841844f0fe4  linux-
  image-4.8.0-37-generic_4.8.0-37.39bug149763_ppc64el.deb

  == Comment: #20 - Ping Tian Han  - 2017-02-20 00:57:30 ==
  (In reply to comment #18)
  > hi, Ping Tian Han
  > Please see the test result, is it what you expected?
  > before the patches
  > root@seedlp1:~# numastat
  >node0   node2   node3
  > numa_hit   0   0   0
  > numa_miss  0  3525215466
  > numa_foreign   0  3525215466
  > interleave_hit 056285402
  > local_node 0   0   0
  > other_node 0   0   0
  > root@seedlp1:~# 
  > 
  > after the patches
  > xinhui locking
  > root@seedlp1:/boot# numastat
  >node0   node2   node3
  > numa_hit   0  2387664837
  > numa_miss  0   0   0
  > numa_foreign   0   0   0
  > interleave_hit 048884777
  > local_node 0   0   0
  > other_node 0  2387664837

  This looks good to me. Thanks.

  Please cherry pick the  patches below

  
  
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2df26639e708a88dcc22171949da638a9998f3bc

  
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=41b6167e8f746b475668f1da78599fc4284f18db

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1672953/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1672953] Re: ISST-LTE:pVM:roselp4:ubuntu16.04.2: number of numa_miss and numa_foreign wrong in numastat

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1672953] Re: ISST-LTE:pVM:roselp4:ubuntu16.04.2: number of numa_miss and numa_foreign wrong in numastat

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1672953] Re: ISST-LTE:pVM:roselp4:ubuntu16.04.2: number of numa_miss and numa_foreign wrong in numastat

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1672953] Re: ISST-LTE:pVM:roselp4:ubuntu16.04.2: number of numa_miss and numa_foreign wrong in numastat

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1672953] Re: ISST-LTE:pVM:roselp4:ubuntu16.04.2: number of numa_miss and numa_foreign wrong in numastat

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1672953] Re: ISST-LTE:pVM:roselp4:ubuntu16.04.2: number of numa_miss and numa_foreign wrong in numastat

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1672953] Re: ISST-LTE:pVM:roselp4:ubuntu16.04.2: number of numa_miss and numa_foreign wrong in numastat

7 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information