[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1888507] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-09-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-09-01 03:25 EDT--- und BPF ist derzeit nicht mehr dringend, da arbeiten wir jetzt upstream, und werden zu einem sp?teren zeitpunt wiederkommen falls es ein target date gibt, aber das schreib ich dir noch in den LP Status update from

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1888507] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-08-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-08-18 06:26 EDT--- @Cascado: IBM's response to your comment suggestion: wer: 1) the offering will be based on Ubuntu 20.04 2) it is okay for us to use clang-8 (actually the userspace code runs in a Ubuntu 18.04 container including the

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1888507] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-08-14 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2020-08-14 06:51 EDT--- @Canonical: what is the current expectation on solving this issue. This one it timely critical for our upcoming offering. A comment from Canonicals side would be appreciated.. Many thx in advance -- You received

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1888507] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-08-04 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-08-04 18:45 EDT--- Hi, I fixed the skydive header as follows: --- a/ebpf/defs.h +++ b/ebpf/defs.h @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static __inline int discret_memcmp(char *s1, char *s2, int n) /* helper marcro to define a map, socket, kprobe section in the * eBPF

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1888507] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2020-07-28 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2020-07-28 08:05 EDT--- Interesting, this might explain why the relocation issue did not trigger for me. In the meantime I posted fixes to other bpf/samples issues: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200728120059.132256-1-...@linux.ibm.com/ -- You received