Hi,
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:02:17 +0100 (CET)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.30
Kristoffer Ericson wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:19:54 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
On Sunday 22 November 2009, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 09:38 -0800, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
I did a bisect yesterday on this, and the results
seemed to have worked over
Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
be li
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:47:03 +0100
Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 09:38 -0800, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
> > I did a bisect yesterday on this, and the results
> > seemed to have worked over here by reverting:
> >
> > 75e6c3b72b3ab01c47629f3fbd0fed4e6550bf3a
> > cfg80211: lower dy
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:19:54 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
> On Sunday 22 November 2009, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 09:38 -0800, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> >
> > > I did a bisect yesterday on this, and the results
> > > seemed to have worked over here by reverting:
> > >
Johannes Berg wrote:
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 09:38 -0800, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
I did a bisect yesterday on this, and the results
seemed to have worked over here by reverting:
75e6c3b72b3ab01c47629f3fbd0fed4e6550bf3a
cfg80211: lower dynamic PS timeout to 100ms
if Kristoffer can try rever
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http:
On Sunday 22 November 2009, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 09:38 -0800, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
> > I did a bisect yesterday on this, and the results
> > seemed to have worked over here by reverting:
> >
> > 75e6c3b72b3ab01c47629f3fbd0fed4e6550bf3a
> > cfg80211: lower dynamic PS
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 09:38 -0800, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> I did a bisect yesterday on this, and the results
> seemed to have worked over here by reverting:
>
> 75e6c3b72b3ab01c47629f3fbd0fed4e6550bf3a
> cfg80211: lower dynamic PS timeout to 100ms
>
> if Kristoffer can try reverting this one
11 matches
Mail list logo
