RE: [Bug #13667] drm: display arifacts when X.Org is stopped

2009-07-31 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Frans Pop [mailto:elen...@planet.nl] >Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 4:41 AM >To: Dave Airlie >Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki; Linux Kernel Mailing List; Kernel >Testers List; Siddha, Suresh B; Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Subject: Re: [Bug #13667] drm:

Re: cpufreq cleanups - .30 vs .31

2009-07-27 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 07:25 -0700, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 01:18:18PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > > > > > So if not find too intrusive, I'd say: > > > Venkatesh's whole series of: > > > [patch 0/4] Take care of cpufreq l

Re: [patch 0/4] Take care of cpufreq lockdep issues (take 2)

2009-07-06 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 17:08 -0700, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: > Since recent chanegs to ondemand and conservative governor, there have been > multiple reports of lockdep issues in cpufreq. Patch series takes care of > these problems. > > This is the next attempt following the one

Re: [patch 2.6.30 3/4] cpufreq add gov mutex

2009-07-06 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 12:36 -0700, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * Pallipadi, Venkatesh (venkatesh.pallip...@intel.com) wrote: > > > > > > >-Original Message- > > >From: Mathieu Desnoyers [mailto:mathieu.desnoy...@polymtl.ca] > > >Sent: Friday

Re: [patch 2.6.30 2/4] CPUFREQ: fix (utter) cpufreq_add_dev mess

2009-07-06 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 12:41 -0700, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * Pallipadi, Venkatesh (venkatesh.pallip...@intel.com) wrote: > > > > > > >-Original Message- > > >From: Mathieu Desnoyers [mailto:mathieu.desnoy...@polymtl.ca] > > >Sent: Friday

Re: cpufreq cleanups - .30 vs .31

2009-07-06 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 04:18 -0700, Thomas Renninger wrote: > Hi Dave, > > this is about Venki's and Mathieu's recently sent cleanups. > I'd like to summarize this to help finding a solution: > > IMO Venki's approach (making .governor() always be called with > rwsem held) is the cleaner one and th

RE: [patch 2.6.30 2/4] CPUFREQ: fix (utter) cpufreq_add_dev mess

2009-07-03 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Mathieu Desnoyers [mailto:mathieu.desnoy...@polymtl.ca] >Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 8:25 AM >To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Pallipadi, Venkatesh; Dave >Jones; Thomas Renninger; cpuf...@vger.kernel.org; >kernel-testers@vger.kernel.o

RE: [patch 2.6.30 3/4] cpufreq add gov mutex

2009-07-03 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Mathieu Desnoyers [mailto:mathieu.desnoy...@polymtl.ca] >Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 8:25 AM >To: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Pallipadi, Venkatesh; Dave >Jones; Thomas Renninger; cpuf...@vger.kernel.org; >kernel-testers@vger.kernel.o

RE: [patch 0/4] Take care of cpufreq lockdep issues (take 2)

2009-07-03 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Ingo Molnar [mailto:mi...@elte.hu] >Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 11:54 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Dave Jones; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; >cpuf...@vger.kernel.org; kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org; >Rafael J. Wysocki; Dav

RE: [patch 1/4] cpufreq: Eliminate the recent lockdep warnings in cpufreq

2009-07-03 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Thomas Renninger [mailto:tr...@suse.de] >Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 4:41 AM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Dave Jones; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; >cpuf...@vger.kernel.org; kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org; Ingo >Molnar; Rafael J

RE: [patch 1/4] cpufreq: Eliminate the recent lockdep warnings in cpufreq

2009-07-02 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Mathieu Desnoyers [mailto:mathieu.desnoy...@polymtl.ca] >Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 6:07 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: Dave Jones; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; >cpuf...@vger.kernel.org; kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org; Ingo >Moln

Re: [Bug #13424] possible deadlock when doing governor switching

2009-06-29 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 18:25 -0700, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * Rafael J. Wysocki (r...@sisk.pl) wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known r

Re: [patch 2/3] cpufreq: Define dbs_mutex purpose and cleanup its usage

2009-06-25 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 12:46 -0700, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * venkatesh.pallip...@intel.com (venkatesh.pallip...@intel.com) wrote: > > Commit b14893a62c73af0eca414cfed505b8c09efc613c although it was very > > much needed to cleanup ondemand timer cleanly, openup a can of worms > > related to locki

RE: [PATCH 1/2] CPUFREQ: Remove unneeded dbs_mutexes from ondemand and conservative governors

2009-06-25 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
ve.darks...@gmail.com; penb...@cs.helsinki.fi; >kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org; da...@redhat.com; Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] CPUFREQ: Remove unneeded dbs_mutexes >from ondemand and conservative governors > >* Thomas Renninger (tr...@suse.de) wrote: >> Comment fr

Re: [Bug #13475] suspend/hibernate lockdep warning

2009-06-17 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 08:29 -0700, Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Wednesday 17 June 2009 02:39:25 Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 08:23:29AM -0700, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > * Simon Holm Thøgersen (o...@cs.aau.dk) wrote: > > > > man, 08

Re: [Bug #13475] suspend/hibernate lockdep warning

2009-06-16 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 08:23:29AM -0700, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * Simon Holm Thøgersen (o...@cs.aau.dk) wrote: > > man, 08 06 2009 kl. 10:32 -0400, skrev Dave Jones: > > > On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 08:48:45AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Bug-Entry : > > > http:

Re: [PATCH] remove rwsem lock from CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP call (second call site)

2009-06-08 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 08:23 -0700, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * Dave Jones (da...@redhat.com) wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 08:48:45AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > > > > > >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13475 > > > > > >> Subject : suspend/

RE: [Bug #12417] glx performance drop with: "x86: PAT: implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3"

2009-01-13 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>-Original Message- >From: Alexey Fisher [mailto:bug-tr...@fisher-privat.net] >Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:39 PM >To: Rafael J. Wysocki >Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List; Kernel Testers List; H. Peter >Anvin; Pallipadi, Venkatesh; Siddha, Suresh B >Subject: