Sorry for the late reply:
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 at 00:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Yes, the bug is
Hi
On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please
On Tuesday, June 22, 2010, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
Hi
On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I doubt
the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue.
It will, see how name wht slashes propagated by request_irq()
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:39:48 +0300
Alexey Dobriyan adobri...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I
doubt the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue.
It will, see how name wht
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Alexey Dobriyan adobri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 01:57:40PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On brief review, they look like completely different issues. I doubt
the second patch will fix the flexcop-pci issue.
It will, see how name wht slashes
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team
Hi
On Sunday 13 June 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 at 17:22, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue
for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week:
So, now we have two patches for slightly different issues?
*
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Christian Kujau li...@nerdbynature.de wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 at 17:22, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
Still existing in 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 HEAD, however a patch fixing the issue
for b2c2-flexcop/ flexcop-pci has been posted last week:
So, now we have two
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
On Sun, 9 May 2010 at 23:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau li...@nerdbynature.de
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (58 days old)
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
Hi
On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
Hi
On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from
Hi
On Friday 30 April 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau li...@nerdbynature.de
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (38 days old)
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 05:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
return fixed_name;
}
+static const char *unslash_name(const char
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 22:18, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch.
I added GFP_KERNEL to kstrdup to make the compile error go away:
fs/proc/proc_devtree.c: In function ‘unslash_name’:
fs/proc/proc_devtree.c:183: error: too few arguments to function ‘kstrdup’
Christian Kujau li...@nerdbynature.de writes:
+ while ((p = strstr(p, /)))
You want to use strchr.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
And now for something completely different.
--
To unsubscribe from
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry:
return
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 11:15 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 at 22:18, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Try this 100% unbuilt, 100% untested patch.
I added GFP_KERNEL to kstrdup to make the compile error go away:
fs/proc/proc_devtree.c: In function ‘unslash_name’:
On Wednesday 21 April 2010, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
27 matches
Mail list logo
