On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:23:44 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.39. Please verify if it still
This was with integrated graphics. But seems this is fixed in rc5 or
rc5+ because after compiling rc5 I didn't see these artifacts anymore
On 29.06.2011 19:47, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:23:44 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysockir...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated
On Wednesday, June 29, 2011, Alexander Zhaunerchyk wrote:
This was with integrated graphics. But seems this is fixed in rc5 or
rc5+ because after compiling rc5 I didn't see these artifacts anymore
OK, I'm closing the bug then.
Thanks,
Rafael
On 29.06.2011 19:47, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:30:52 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.39. Please verify if it still
I can't bisect. I tried to bisect other other bug but with some commits
I can't even boot, kernel hangs in panic.
On 15.06.2011 21:43, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:30:52 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysockir...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:59:41 +0300
Alexander Zhaunerchyk alex.vi...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't bisect. I tried to bisect other other bug but with some commits
I can't even boot, kernel hangs in panic.
You can try and use 'git bisect visualize' which will show you all
commits not yet eliminated
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.39. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :