Re: [stable] [PATCH 1/2] CPUFREQ: Remove unneeded dbs_mutexes from ondemand and conservative governors

2009-07-01 Thread Thomas Renninger
On Wednesday 01 July 2009 01:39:12 Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 07:14:52PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: * Greg KH (g...@kroah.com) wrote: I don't see the patch below in Linus's tree. If it's there, what is the git commit id? As I pointed out in an earlier reply,

Re: [stable] [PATCH 1/2] CPUFREQ: Remove unneeded dbs_mutexes from ondemand and conservative governors

2009-06-30 Thread Greg KH
I don't see the patch below in Linus's tree. If it's there, what is the git commit id? thanks, greg k-h On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 04:01:24PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: Comment from Venkatesh: ... This mutex is just serializing the changes to those variables. I could't think of any

Re: [stable] [PATCH 1/2] CPUFREQ: Remove unneeded dbs_mutexes from ondemand and conservative governors

2009-06-30 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
* Greg KH (g...@kroah.com) wrote: I don't see the patch below in Linus's tree. If it's there, what is the git commit id? As I pointed out in an earlier reply, this patch is bogus and adds racy data structure updates. It should not be merged. Venkatesh is working on a proper fix. Mathieu

Re: [stable] [PATCH 1/2] CPUFREQ: Remove unneeded dbs_mutexes from ondemand and conservative governors

2009-06-30 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 07:14:52PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: * Greg KH (g...@kroah.com) wrote: I don't see the patch below in Linus's tree. If it's there, what is the git commit id? As I pointed out in an earlier reply, this patch is bogus and adds racy data structure updates.