On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 17:08 -0700, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> Since recent chanegs to ondemand and conservative governor, there have been
> multiple reports of lockdep issues in cpufreq. Patch series takes care of
> these problems.
>
> This is the next attempt following the one here, which was
kernel.org; kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org;
> >Rafael J. Wysocki; Dave Young; Pekka Enberg; Mathieu
> >Desnoyers; Thomas Renninger
> >Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] Take care of cpufreq lockdep issues (take 2)
> >
> >
> >* venkatesh.pallip...@intel.com wrote:
> >
&g
e Young; Pekka Enberg; Mathieu
>Desnoyers; Thomas Renninger
>Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] Take care of cpufreq lockdep issues (take 2)
>
>
>* venkatesh.pallip...@intel.com wrote:
>
>> Since recent chanegs to ondemand and conservative governor, there
>> have been multiple rep
* Ingo Molnar (mi...@elte.hu) wrote:
>
> * venkatesh.pallip...@intel.com wrote:
>
> > Since recent chanegs to ondemand and conservative governor, there
> > have been multiple reports of lockdep issues in cpufreq. Patch
> > series takes care of these problems.
> >
> > This is the next attempt
* venkatesh.pallip...@intel.com wrote:
> Since recent chanegs to ondemand and conservative governor, there
> have been multiple reports of lockdep issues in cpufreq. Patch
> series takes care of these problems.
>
> This is the next attempt following the one here, which was not a
> complete f
