Re: [Bug #15198] Radeon KMS regression

On Tuesday 02 February 2010, Kevin Winchester wrote: On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 01:22 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.32.

Re: [Bug #15192] netperf ~50% regression with 2.6.33-rc1, bisect to 1b9508f

On Monday 01 February 2010, Mike Galbraith wrote: On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 01:22 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.32.

Re: [Bug #15144] HDA Intel Audio hang on boot

On Monday 01 February 2010, Takashi Iwai wrote: At Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:01:21 +, Sid Boyce wrote: On 01/02/10 00:22, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current

Re: [Bug #15076] System panic under load with clockevents_program_event

On Monday 01 February 2010, okias wrote: Still valid. But reproduction without HIGHMEM is minimal, but still annoying. Thanks for the update. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kernel-testers in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo

Re: [Bug #14950] tbench regression with 2.6.33-rc1

On Monday 01 February 2010, Mike Galbraith wrote: On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 01:22 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.32.

Re: [Bug #15124] PCI host bridge windows ignored (works with pci=use_crs)

On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:42:58PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday 01 February 2010, Yinghai Lu wrote: On 01/31/2010 04:22 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on

Re: [Bug #15127] Bluetooth: sleeping function called from invalid context

On Monday 01 February 2010, Marcel Holtmann wrote: Hi Rafael, This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and

Re: [Bug #14922] 2.6.32 seemed to have broken nVidia MCP7A sata controller

On Monday 01 February 2010, Robert Hancock wrote: On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. The following bug entry is on the current list

Re: [Bug #14897] i915: Commit 0e442c60 causes flickering

On Monday 01 February 2010, David John wrote: On 02/01/2010 06:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions

Re: [Bug #15124] PCI host bridge windows ignored (works with pci=use_crs)

On Tuesday 02 February 2010 01:42:58 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday 01 February 2010, Yinghai Lu wrote: On 01/31/2010 04:22 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on

Re: [Bug #14942] gkrellm no longer shows all the temperatures on thinkpad x60

On Monday 01 February 2010, Pavel Machek wrote: On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14942 Subject : gkrellm no longer shows all the temperatures on thinkpad x60 Submitter : Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz Date

Re: [Bug #14949] drm_vm.c:drm_mmap: possible circular locking dependency detected

On Tuesday 02 February 2010, Borislav Petkov wrote: (Adding Greg to Cc:) On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:46:45PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday 01 February 2010, Borislav Petkov wrote: On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: This message has been

Re: [Bug #14894] pohmelfs: NULL pointer dereference

On Tuesday 02 February 2010, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: Hi. Sorry, it took really long to catch all the things around, but it is better than never. History says that commit which introduced per-bdi writeback broke pohmelfs, since it does not have backing store device and did not fill

Re: [Bug #14894] pohmelfs: NULL pointer dereference

On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:57:43PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: Hi. Sorry, it took really long to catch all the things around, but it is better than never. History says that commit which introduced per-bdi writeback broke pohmelfs, since it does not have backing store device and did not

Re: [Bug #14894] pohmelfs: NULL pointer dereference

On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:18:09PM -0800, Greg KH (g...@kroah.com) wrote: Jens, thanks a lot for you patch, Greg please pull it up. If you did not find it or can not extract from the reply, I will resend. Please resend it with a signed-off-by line so that I can apply it. Done, thank you.

Re: ohci1394_dma=early crash since 2.6.32 (was Re: [Bug #14487] PANIC: early exception 08 rip 246:10 error ffffffff810251b5 cr2 0)

o.k. finally finished with the bisect: reverting this gets things going on 2.6.33-rc5 789d03f584484af85dbdc64935270c8e45f36ef7 is the first bad commit commit 789d03f584484af85dbdc64935270c8e45f36ef7 Author: Jan Beulich jbeul...@novell.com Date: Tue Jun 30 11:52:23 2009 +0100 x86: Fix