[Bug #14999] possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14999 Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend Submitter : Christian Casteyde casteyde.christ...@free.fr Date: 2010-01-06 21:52 (47 days old) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kernel-testers in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14999] possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl writes: This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14999 Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend Submitter : Christian Casteyde casteyde.christ...@free.fr Date : 2010-01-06 21:52 (40 days old) I have a set of patches to clear up the sysfs lockdep false positives. http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/11/329 It requires sprinking a bunch of sysfs_attr_init on the few dynamically allocated sysfs attributes, and I haven't found them all yet. Otherwise it seems to be working well. Greg should pick up those patches shortly and they should be appearing in linux-next and then ultimately in 2.6.34. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kernel-testers in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [Bug #14999] possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend
On Monday 15 February 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl writes: This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14999 Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend Submitter : Christian Casteyde casteyde.christ...@free.fr Date: 2010-01-06 21:52 (40 days old) I have a set of patches to clear up the sysfs lockdep false positives. http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/11/329 It requires sprinking a bunch of sysfs_attr_init on the few dynamically allocated sysfs attributes, and I haven't found them all yet. Otherwise it seems to be working well. Greg should pick up those patches shortly and they should be appearing in linux-next and then ultimately in 2.6.34. Great, I'm glad that these issues are being worked on. Thanks for the information. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kernel-testers in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Bug #14999] possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14999 Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend Submitter : Christian Casteyde casteyde.christ...@free.fr Date: 2010-01-06 21:52 (26 days old) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kernel-testers in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
