On Monday 08 February 2010, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 08.02.2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry :
On 08.02.2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:20:50PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Xiaotian Feng xtf...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:30:02 +0800
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent
From: Neil Horman nhor...@tuxdriver.com
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 06:55:18 -0500
He claims this dependency is deliberate and requires, to which I agree, but he
would seem to fix that by making the dccp_probe module error out in the event
that dccp wasn't loaded. Why bother with that?
Neil,
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry :
