[PATCH] remove kernel-firmware prereq

Now that kernel-firmware is no longer built, can we remove the pre-req so we don't need to use --nodeps when installing a new kernel? Or am I missing some other magic when installing? Cheers, Don Index: kernel.spec === RCS file:

Re: [Bug 225969] Merge Review: kernel

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 02:10:23PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: kernel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /lib/modules/2.6.36-1.fc15.x86_64/build ../../../usr/src/kernels/2.6.36-1.fc15.x86_64 (It seems odd that /lib/modules/2.6.36-1.fc15.x86_64/build is packaged in kernel, but

Re: [Bug 225969] Merge Review: kernel

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:50:25AM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: On 10/27/2010 11:02 AM, Don Zickus wrote: Not that I feel like arguing to save dangling symlink, what happens in the case when you install kernel-devel-$KERNVER but there is no kernel-$KERNVER installed to match? Does

Re: 2.6.35.10-74 compilation (and build) problems

On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:36:40PM +, Mr Dash Four wrote: vi .config (this is to add the magic # x86_64 at the top) I don't understand why you need a commented line??? What's the magic about it? A comment is ignored. See the Fedora Wiki ( :-D ) for building the kernel - the target

Re: 2.6.35.10-74 compilation (and build) problems

On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 04:14:08AM +, Mr Dash Four wrote: See the Fedora Wiki ( :-D ) for building the kernel - the target arch needs to be added as a comment on the first line of that .config file (that is particularly important if I do cross-compilation of the kernel - I add # i386 for

Re: 2.6.35.10-74 compilation (and build) problems

On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 07:53:38PM -0800, JD wrote: Thank you for the elucidation, Don. I find it very useful, as I have struggled with this issue for a long time. So, for a sysadmin, who needs a custom configured kernel for multiple machines, and wants to produce the custom binaries for

Re: 2.6.35.10-74 compilation (and build) problems

On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:47:41PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote: So, what do I do? I simply prep from source (rpmbuild -bp kernel.spec) and then cd to ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/kernel-2.6.35.10-74/linux-2.6.35.i686, copy my current kernel's config file to .config, run make oldconfig and male all

Re: 2.6.35.10-74 compilation (and build) problems

On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:18:42AM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote: We could probably mimic the old linux-kernel-test.patch which was a stub patch to allow developers to quickly test their patches without mucking with the spec file, but instead for config files (like the %rhel thing). I think

Re: linux-2.6-debug-nmi-timeout.patch

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:12:23AM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote: arch/x86/kernel/apic/nmi.c has been removed upstream, so I'm wondering how to merge this patch... The most appropriate place to change the sample period appears to be kernel/watchdog.c::get_sample_period and making the '5'

Re: 2.6.35.10-74 compilation (and build) problems

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 07:16:33PM +, Mr Dash Four wrote: Executing make oldconfig does not change that! DRM_NOVEAU group of options are vital as they compile the driver for my video card and if this is missing I am getting the VGA-style bootup screen and everything is a mess - all this

Re: 2.6.35.10-74 compilation (and build) problems

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 08:03:04PM +, Mr Dash Four wrote: Don Zickus wrote: On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 07:16:33PM +, Mr Dash Four wrote: Executing make oldconfig does not change that! DRM_NOVEAU group of options are vital as they compile the driver for my video card

Re: 2.6.35.10-74 compilation (and build) problems

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 08:38:32PM +, Mr Dash Four wrote: Oh, I suck, I searched for DRM_NOVEAU instead of DRM_NOUVEAU. I did exactly the same as you as my French is really crap! Jarod figured it out. For some reason CONFIG_STAGING needs to be set to 'y' for DRM_NOUVEU to be enabled

Re: [PATCH 2/3] [RFC] Print a watchdog message at KERN_WARNING level

On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 06:32:33PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 10:27 -0500, Don Zickus wrote: I am concerned about the error you are seeing, -95. Is it possible you can provide me a 'dmesg' log of your boot up. I want to see what chipset the perf subsystem thinks

Re: [PATCH 2/3] [RFC] Print a watchdog message at KERN_WARNING level

On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 08:42:34PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 13:38 -0500, Don Zickus wrote: [All] I am interested in is the few lines above the NMI watchdog error that starts with Performance Events: [0.016136] Performance Events: [0.016139] no APIC, boot

Re: [PATCH 2/3] [RFC] Print a watchdog message at KERN_WARNING level

On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 02:10:49PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 16:46 -0500, Don Zickus wrote: Here is a patch I was looking to post upstream. This should address your concerns. Let me know how it works out for you. 0) Compiles cleanly. 1) Nothing shows up anymore

Re: [PATCH] Add patch to let watchdog and perf work on Pentium4s (rhbz 713675)

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 04:32:07PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 02:43:44PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote: Not sure what the patch prefence is for the mailing list. This patch applies to the fedpkg kernel git tree. Better changelog below. Waiting on test feedback

Re: Kernel-3.1 Crash

On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 06:59:12PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: The digital picture are here: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/kernel-boot.tar.gz According to our DM guys this fix just missed 3.1 http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-block.git;a=commit;h=f26d8f0562da76731cb049943a0e9d9fa81d946a

Re: Kernel-3.1 Crash

On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 02:29:56PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com writes: On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 06:59:12PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: The digital picture are here: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/kernel-boot.tar.gz According to our DM guys this fix just

Re: Kernel-3.1 Crash

On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 02:43:22PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: This doesn't look like the same problem. Here we've got BUG: scheduling while atomic. If it was the bug fixed by the above commits, then you would hit a BUG_ON. I would start looking at the btrfs bits to see if they're holding

Re: grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 05:56:42PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello all, I'm getting the $SUBJECT error when I try to install a rawhide kernel on an updated f16 vm. # rpm -ihv kernel-3.2.0-0.rc6.git0.1.pnfsdlexp.fc16.x86_64.rpm Preparing...

Re: How to fix the kernel RPM build problem when a patch is applied?

cc'ing fedora in case this helps others. On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 07:51:43PM +0800, GaoYi wrote: Hi Don, I 've encounter the same error as your previous message: http://markmail.org/message/6pkwdnxfhlh35cld#query:+page:1+mid:yf2bsyvd6l3g5rke+state:results . I would like to know

Re: How to fix the kernel RPM build problem when a patch is applied?

On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 09:59:30AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote: The easiest thing for you to do is to take the config option that is spit out as an error (CONFIG_TIPC_UNICLUSTER_FRIENDLY and others in your link above), and add

Re: How to fix the kernel RPM build problem when a patch is applied?

please keep fedora kernel cc'd, there are better people who can answer this than me. On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 11:19:26AM +0800, GaoYi wrote: Hi Don, Thanks very much for your prompt reply. I've tried your method to modified the config-generic in the extracted path: /root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/.

Re: Using merge_config.sh

On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 01:33:41PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: Hi All, We've been using merge.pl to merge Fedora's config file fragments for as long as I can remember. However, in the interest of using what's upstream, I took a look at the newly added merge_config.sh script and what it would

Re: Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud

On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:02:17AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 08:25:12PM +0900, Sandro red Mathys wrote: For example, lets start with 100MB package requirement for the kernel (and say 2 GB

Re: Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud

On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 09:28:45AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:16:21 -0500 Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote: Also, I just arbitrarly threw out 100MB, if we should start higher, say 150MB, then it doesn't matter to me. :-) This entire disk size optimization seems

Re: Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud

On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 08:16:00AM +0900, Sandro red Mathys wrote: On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:02:17AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 05, 2014

Re: Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud

On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 08:38:44AM +0900, Sandro red Mathys wrote: On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 17:37:42 +0100 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: in general you need to multiply the wasted space for each instance Exactly,

Re: Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud

On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:32:55AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:02:47AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: If it's _necessary_, that's one thing. I've yet to really see any data backing up necessity on any of this at all though. Right now it seems to be sitting in the

Re: Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud

On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:23:15AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Sandro red Mathys r...@fedoraproject.org wrote: I think Josh is mostly there. He has 58MB + 5M vmlinuz + similar? firmwre. Firmware is owned by linux-firmware, not the kernel package. I didn't

Re: [WIP] Create kernel-core and kernel-drivers subpackages

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 03:13:54PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: TODO: Right now this is what has been building in my COPR for the past week. It works well on x86_64 (which is all I've tested), and i686 builds but I know it's broken on ARM. To finish it up, I need: 1) Review from you all. I

Re: [WIP] Create kernel-core and kernel-drivers subpackages

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 02:51:13PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 02:13:20PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote: On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 03:13:54PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: TODO: Right now this is what has been building in my COPR for the past week. It works well on x86_64

Re: [WIP] Create kernel-core and kernel-drivers subpackages

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 03:47:19PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: I believe anaconda does install kernel today. So since the kernel metapackage Requires:kernel-drivers, it will bring that in automatically. Updates from existing installs would pick up kernel, kernel-core, and kernel-drivers based

Re: [PATCH] perf: install trace-event plugins

On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 03:11:01PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: perf hardcodes $libdir to be lib for all but x86_64, so kludge around it until upstream gets their act together. Did you post this upstream too? Cheers, Don --kyle diff --git a/kernel.spec b/kernel.spec index

Re: Uhhuh - Dazed and confused, but trying to continue :)

On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 11:50:38AM +0100, poma wrote: Salutem This happened only on thaw from S4 aka hibernate. What should be strange power saving mode these messages relate!? [ 208.252986] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 3d on CPU 0. [ 208.252991] Do you have a strange power

Re: [PATCH] kernel.spec: no more files in /boot

On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:34:41AM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: Meh, not in CC and not subscribed to kernel-list. Anyway... On 04.05.2015 19:57, Tom Callaway wrote: On 05/04/2015 01:49 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: So if I understand the patch correctly, your usecase will still be valid as the

Re: [PATCH] kernel.spec: no more files in /boot

On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 04:29:11PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: On 05/06/2015 02:00 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Jarod Wilson ja...@redhat.com wrote: One other thought: what happens when /boot is on the same file system as /usr and/or /lib? Does the file get unnecessarily

Re: [PATCH] kernel.spec: no more files in /boot

On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 10:41:28AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: Not that my opinion matters much, but I think this is an interesting mind shift. The end result is the same as today, just extra files in /lib/modules/`uname -r`, right? Actually, I was hoping some other kernel maintainers would

Re: Fedora kernel git tree and package maintenance

On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 07:42:08AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Will the exploded tree go away if we don't change to this model? Also unclear. I'd hesitantly say it would stick around, but it might change in the

Re: Fedora kernel git tree and package maintenance

On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:17:29AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 07:42:08AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Will the exploded

Re: Kernel configurations for Fedora

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:46:00AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > The Fedora kernel has had roughly the same system for generating > the kernel configuration for a very long time. There are a series > of files listing configuration choices (CONFIG_FOO=y, CONFIG_FOO > is not set etc.) that get

Re: [PATCH] config: Enable CONFIG_MODVERSIONS

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:53:06AM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Don Zickus <dzic...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 04:25:30PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > > > > I don't think it would be a bad idea to enable in ra

[PATCH] config: Enable CONFIG_MODVERSIONS

prevent various panics. Though Fedora traditionally closes such bugs anyway. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzic...@redhat.com> diff --git a/config-generic b/config-generic index 7444895..e0e9387 100644 --- a/config-generic +++ b/config-generic @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ CONFIG_MODULES=y CONFIG_MODULE_UN

Re: [PATCH] config: Enable CONFIG_MODVERSIONS

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 08:49:24AM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 12/01/2016 06:58 AM, Don Zickus wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:53:06AM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Don Zickus <dzic...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > &g

Re: [PATCH] config: Enable CONFIG_MODVERSIONS

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 04:25:30PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > > I don't think it would be a bad idea to enable in rawhide and see how it > > works out, from there it will trickle down as the stable releases get > > rebased. While turning it on in theory shouldn't create a problem. I > >

Re: [PATCH] config: Enable CONFIG_MODVERSIONS

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:29:25PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Wed, 2016-11-30 at 17:15 -0500, Don Zickus wrote: > > I noticed that CONFIG_MODVERSIONS was not enabled in Fedora. I do not know > > the history and would be curious to know if someone knew. > > > &

Re: [PATCHv2] Switch to more standard debuginfo generation

defines. Thanks Laura! Sorry about the previous version. Acked-by: Don Zickus <dzic...@redhat.com> Mark W., Do you have much insight into how the below definitions would interact with the kernel? > @@ -395,7 +395,14 @@ BuildRequires: pciutils-devel gettext ncurses-devel > Bu

Re: [PATCHv2] Switch to more standard debuginfo generation

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:55:34PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 11:01 -0400, Don Zickus wrote: > > Mark W., > > > > Do you have much insight into how the below definitions would interact with > > the kernel? > > > > &

Re: [PATCH] Switch to more standard debuginfo generation

On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 02:36:48PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > From: Laura Abbott > > Once upon a time, the kernel needed a lot of special handling to > generate proper debuginfo as the kernel was ahead in technology. These > days, rpm has improved debuginfo support. The

Re: [PATCH] Switch to more standard debuginfo generation

On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 11:16:05AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > >> > >> It's really not pretty, I spent at least a full day figuring out the > >> regexes because I had no idea how they work. I'm sorely tempted to > >> put some ascii art warning of the horrors within. More macros might help > >>

Re: [PATCH] Switch to more standard debuginfo generation

On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 12:53:10PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 04/05/2017 07:52 AM, Don Zickus wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 02:36:48PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > >> From: Laura Abbott <labb...@redhat.com> > >> > >> Once upon a time, t

Re: [PATCHv3] Update debuginfo generation

On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 04:38:25PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > > Once upon a time, the kernel needed a lot of special handling to > generate proper debuginfo as the kernel was ahead in technology. These > days, rpm has improved debuginfo support. The kernel has not kept up > with this and it's

Re: RFC: Moving kernel-tools out of kernel.spec

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:03:16PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > Like all good bits of software, the kernel.spec has grown over time. > Part of this growth has come from building more of the userspace > tools that live under the tools directory of the kernel. I've been > experimenting with moving

[PATCH 2/2] configs: Update config generation script to use configs/fedora

The previous patch moved the configs/base-{generic,debug} to configs/fedora. Now we update the scripts to reflect that change. Changing the scripts was straightforward. Handling overrides that didn't use generic names was a little trickier. To handle random override names (well rhel), I added

[PATCH 1/2] configs: Move base-debug and base-generic to configs/fedora

It was suggested that base-debug and base-generic were not good names to use. Further discussion led to using configs/fedora for the base config files and configs/rhel for any overrides. This patch does a plain mkdir configs/fedora git mv configs/base-{generic,debug} configs/fedora No code

Updating config option layout and scripts

Hi Laura, As per our conversation, here is my pull request for the config changes: https://pagure.io/fedora-kernel-dzickus.git rh_sync As part of an effort to foster better cross collaboration with internal Red Hat kernels, align the configs layout to match that kernel. This will allow Red Hat

Re: Reviving the hardware census

t doesn't work for you, feel free to choose something else. :-) I do appreciate the feedback you provided. I might work with folks on my team to address some of them as they could be of benefit for our work too. Cheers, Don > > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Jeremy Cline <jer...

Re: Reviving the hardware census

you guys. Cheers, Don > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Don Zickus <dzic...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 04:09:26PM -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > >> I just looked at the code for lshw. The master branch already supports > >> JSON. We jus

Re: Reviving the hardware census

t; On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Don Zickus <dzic...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 05:02:05PM -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > >> It isn't documented in F27, but it does work. However, we probably > >> want at least this patch: > >> https:

Re: Reviving the hardware census

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 10:49:02PM +, Jeremy Cline wrote: > Hey folks, > > For some time now, Fedora has operated without a database of hardware > users have. Smolt, the old hardware database, was retired in 2012[0] and > its intended successor[1] was never deployed by Fedora Infrastructure.

Re: Reviving the hardware census

works on my F27 box, but I think we have it running successfully under RHEL-7 too. Cheers, Don > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Don Zickus <dzic...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:16:24PM -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > >> I just played around w

Re: Reviving the hardware census

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 01:48:36PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> [1] https://github.com/npmccallum/census > >> [2] https://github.com/npmccallum/census/blob/master/client/plugins/ > >> [3] https://github.com/npmccallum/census/pull/3 > > > > Internally, we have been focusing on using 'lshw' as the

Re: Reviving the hardware census

stance. :-) Cheers, Don > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Don Zickus <dzic...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 10:49:02PM +, Jeremy Cline wrote: > >> Hey folks, > >> > >> For some time now, Fedora has operated without a database o

Re: Updating config option layout and scripts

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 05:24:22PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > It is, but was specifically added so kernels that want to do overrides like > > RHEL could add their own custom configs/debug and configs/generic. > > > > I am open to name changes but the goal was to use Fedora configs as a base >

Re: Updating config option layout and scripts

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 04:50:03PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote: > On 2017-12-11 9:24 AM, Don Zickus wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 05:24:22PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > > It is, but was specifically added so kernels that want to do overrides > > > > like

Re: Updating config option layout and scripts

On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 02:34:28PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Don Zickus <dzic...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 05:34:18AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Laura Abbott <labb...@redh

Re: Updating config option layout and scripts

On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 05:34:18AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Laura Abbott <labb...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 11/10/2017 11:48 AM, Don Zickus wrote: > >> > >> Hi Laura, > >> > >> As per our conversat

Re: [PATCH 0/2] configs: Rename base-{generic,debug} to configs/fedora/

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 04:39:26PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote: > This patchset renames the configs/base-{generic,debug} to > configs/fedora/{generic,debug} and updates the scripts to reflect that. Hi Jarod, Peter, Does this approach work better? Cheers, Don > > Because the configs

Re: [PATCH 0/2] configs: Rename base-{generic,debug} to configs/fedora/

On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 11:00:03AM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 12/20/2017 04:04 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: > > On 12/20/2017 09:39 AM, Don Zickus wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 04:39:26PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote: > > > > This patchset renames t

Re: Can't capture vmcore?

(cc'ing Dae Young) On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 07:41:36AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Maxim Burgerhout wrote: > > I'm getting kernel panics in a VM that functions as a hypervisor, the moment > > I spin up the nested guest (on AMD ThreadRipper / Fedora

[PATCH] Fix misnamed CONFIG files

A couple of CONFIG file names were misnamed during their creation. Fix them up. configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_RB revisit this if performance isn't horrible -> configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_RB and configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_DPM_WATCHDOG revisit this in debug ->

Re: Testers for LCD Panel Self Refresh on laptops with Intel graphics wanted

On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 12:34:50PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > For the "Improved Laptop Battery Life" feature: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife > > I'm working on for Fedora 28 I would like to also try and enable > Panel Self Refresh on laptops

Re: Testers for LCD Panel Self Refresh on laptops with Intel graphics wanted

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 10:11:03AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 01-02-18 15:59, Don Zickus wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 12:34:50PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > For the "Improved Laptop Battery Life" f

Re: Testers for LCD Panel Self Refresh on laptops with Intel graphics wanted

On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 01:16:55PM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 12:34:50PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > For the "Improved Laptop Battery Life" feature: > > >

Re: Current specfile misapplies v4.14.10 stable update for fc26

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 01:52:49PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > 0) The v4.14.10 stable updates adds a new executable (tools/objtool/sync- > check.sh). Somehow this was added non-executable during my local build of > v4.14.10 (on fc26, that is). This made the build fail: > > [...] > + make -s

Re: Current specfile misapplies v4.14.10 stable update for fc26

On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 05:13:59PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 09:50 -0500, Don Zickus wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 01:52:49PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > > > diff --git a/kernel.spec b/kernel.spec > > > index 965345c2a26e..b2a1ffbe843d 100

CONFIG name typos?

Hi Laura, Justin, I stumbled upon these CONFIG names today. I assume they are wrong? (full file name in quotes) configs/fedora/generic/'CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_RB revisit this if performance isn't horrible' configs/fedora/generic/'CONFIG_DPM_WATCHDOG revisit this in debug' Cheers, Don

Re: CONFIG name typos?

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 12:26:23AM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 01/23/2018 06:26 PM, Don Zickus wrote: > > Hi Laura, Justin, > > > > I stumbled upon these CONFIG names today. I assume they are wrong? > > > > (full file name in quotes) > > configs/fed

Fedora kernel workflow feedback

Hi, For those that don't know me, my name is Don Zickus, a RHEL kernel engineer for the last decade or so. I am the group lead of various projects including the Fedora kernel workflow changes. I know as Jeremy and Justin have rolled out changes recently there have been concerns over technical

Re: Fedora kernel workflow feedback

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 02:35:24PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Just a quick clarification: > > Am 17.04.20 um 22:06 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis: > > Am 17.04.20 um 20:55 schrieb Don Zickus: > > >> Is there any other large concern with the new workflow? >

Re: Fedora kernel workflow feedback

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 07:36:45AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote: > > Thx. > > > >> For now, I am tracking this issue as > >> https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/28 to not lose it. > >> Does that work for you? > > > > Yeah, sure, no need to hurry. > > > > BTW: I know, renaming

Re: Fedora kernel workflow feedback

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 05:44:14PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Am 20.04.20 um 18:55 schrieb Don Zickus: > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 02:35:24PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> Am 17.04.20 um 22:06 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis: > >>> Am 17.04.

Re: Stepping down as Fedora kernel maintainer

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:11:36PM +, Jeremy Cline wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm moving on to other things at Red Hat, so I'm stepping down as a > kernel maintainer. I'm not going very far and I'll still be involved in > Fedora generally, so you'll still see me around (especially for the > next

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv4] redhat: Change Makefile target names to dist-

d to dist-git-test and > dist-git. Acked-by: Don Zickus > > Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava > > v2: Update to include jcline's newly added docs > v3: Clean up rh-help and rh-full-help output. I made all text conform > to 80 chars. > --- > makefile

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] Drop the static path configuration for the Sphinx docs

> - > -# Add any paths that contain custom static files (such as style sheets) here, > -# relative to this directory. They are copied after the builtin static files, > -# so a file named "default.css" will overwrite the builtin "default.css". > -html_s

Re: [PATCH] Fix boot hang caused by buggy TPM support in some EFI firmwares

Hi Javier, We update the fedora kernel process to use a git tree to submit patches now. Can I ask you to spend a few minutes to read over the new steps https://cki-project.gitlab.io/kernel-ark/submitting-contributions.html and resubmit your request as a merge request? Hopefully after the

Re: kernel-ark | Pipeline #145379201 has failed for osnamechange | 1b1d4554 in !354

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:21:31AM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:13 AM Prarit Bhargava wrote: > > > > On 5/13/20 10:31 AM, Don Zickus wrote: > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 07:22:45AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote: > > >> On 5/13/20 3:50

Re: kernel-ark | Pipeline #145379201 has failed for osnamechange | 1b1d4554 in !354

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 07:22:45AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote: > On 5/13/20 3:50 AM, Jiri Benc wrote: > > On Tue, 12 May 2020 20:19:09 -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote: > >> My patch in merge request 354 changes the names of makefile targets from > >> rh-* to > >> dist-* > > > > I haven't seen

Re: Building custom kernel from src.rpm fails for kernel 5.7

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:52:43AM -0700, stan wrote: > On Mon, 11 May 2020 09:44:54 -0700 > stan wrote: > > > On Mon, 11 May 2020 11:30:26 -0500 > > Justin Forbes wrote: > > > > > when building the kernel with multiple threads, it is entirely > > > possible that the failure happens in one

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3] Add git config hook

On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 01:45:34PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: > On Wed, 6 May 2020 07:37:35 -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote: > > Good idea and I think it would be a smart thing to do. > > I generally agree but I don't think "ark" is the best option. The > kernels are used for Fedora, too, and they will

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv3] Add git config hook

On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 12:50:13PM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote: > On 5/7/20 7:32 PM, Prarit Bhargava wrote: > > On 5/6/20 3:55 PM, Jeremy Cline wrote: > >> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 09:44:55AM -0400, Don Zickus wrote: > >>> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 01:45:34PM +0200, Jir

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv2 0/2] Fix 'make scripts' for kernel-devel package

these separate merge requests to avoid conflicts between > the two patches since both touch the spec file. Acked-by: Don Zickus > > Signed-off-by: Brian Masney > ___ > kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedorap

Re: [PATCH] Fix boot hang caused by buggy TPM support in some EFI firmwares

On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 05:19:12PM -0500, Justin Forbes wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 3:48 PM Don Zickus wrote: > > > Hi Javier, > > > > We update the fedora kernel process to use a git tree to submit patches > > now. > > > > This was a request for

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] configs/aarch64: Fix CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER

ut this solution just moves the breakage from os-build to ark-latest. :-( Therefore, Nacked-by: Don Zickus > > Fixes: dd028d261347 ("[redhat] Sync up ARK's Fedora config tree with Fedora's > dist-git") > Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava > Cc: ho...@redhat.com > Cc

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] configs/aarch64: Fix CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER

+ Mark S. On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 04:34:50PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > From: Prarit Bhargava > > > > The internal make command 'make rh-brew'/'make dist-brew' is failing with > > > > Processing > > /home/prarit/git-kernel/kernel-ark/redhat/configs/kernel-aarch64-debug-fedora.config > >

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] configs/aarch64: Fix CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:33:52AM -0400, Don Zickus wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 01:47:09PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of prarit > wrote: > > From: Prarit Bhargava > > > > The internal make command 'make rh-brew'/'make dist-brew' is failing with > > &g

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH 1/2] Makefile: correct help text for rh-cross--rpms

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 06:35:37PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of masneyb wrote: > From: Brian Masney > > Upstream Status: RHEL only > > The rh-full-help target shows the target rh-cross--rpm, however > it's really rh-cross--rpms. Let's go ahead and correct the help > text. Justin just

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] Add Documentation back to kernel-devel as it has Kconfig now

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 06:28:26PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jmflinuxtx wrote: > From: "Justin M. Forbes" > > This was fixed in Fedora back in January, and then got dropped in the > ARK switch over for some reason. Kernel-devel needs > Documentation/Kconf

test - please ignore

Just testing out the bot. ___ kernel mailing list -- kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List

Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] kernel.spec: don't override upstream compiler flags for ppc64le

On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:06:52PM -, GitLab Bridge on behalf of sharkcz wrote: > From: =?UTF-8?q?Dan=20Hor=C3=A1k?= > > Related: rhbz#1866485 Acked-by: Don Zickus > > Signed-off-by: Dan Horák > --- > redhat/kernel.spec.template | 1 - > 1 file changed,

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >