[PATCH] Add -r to debuginfo_args to invoke eu-strip --reloc-debug-sections.

2012-02-29 Thread Mark Wielaard
@@ fi # ||w | # || || %changelog +* Wed Feb 29 2012 Mark Wielaard m...@klomp.org - 3.3.0-0.rc5.git2.3 +- Add -r to debuginfo_args to invoke eu-strip --reloc-debug-sections. + * Tue Feb 28 2012 Josh Boyer jwbo...@redhat.com - Add patch to enable keyboard

Re: [PATCH] Add 10-yama-ptrace.conf (rhbz 1209492)

2015-06-23 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, Added systemd-maint to the CC. On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 09:11 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Mark Wielaard m...@redhat.com wrote: diff --git a/kernel.spec b/kernel.spec index dfc4500..87efd85 100644 --- a/kernel.spec +++ b/kernel.spec @@ -460,6 +460,9

Re: [PATCH] Add 10-yama-ptrace.conf (rhbz 1209492)

2015-06-23 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 07:25 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: The upstream default is 1 here, correct? It might be worth noting that. Right, when CONFIG_SECURITY_YAMA is enabled. Added that to the description. Updated patch attached. diff --git a/kernel.spec b/kernel.spec index dfc4500..87efd85

[PATCH] Add 10-yama-ptrace.conf (rhbz 1209492)

2015-06-23 Thread Mark Wielaard
}}/modules.*\ %{expand:%%files -f kernel-%{?2:%{2}-}modules.list %{?2:%{2}-}modules}\ %defattr(-,root,root)\ @@ -2375,6 +2383,9 @@ fi # # %changelog +* Thu Jun 23 2015 Mark Wielaard m...@redhat.com +- Add 10-yama-ptrace.conf (rhbz 1209492) + * Thu Jun 18 2015 Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org

Re: [PATCH] Add 10-yama-ptrace.conf (rhbz 1209492)

2015-07-06 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 09:39 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Mark Wielaard m...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 16:56 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 09:11 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Mark Wielaard m

Re: [PATCH] Add 10-yama-ptrace.conf (rhbz 1209492)

2015-08-02 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 12:57:53AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 10:08:14PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 03:49:18PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 09:39 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 9:10 AM

Bug 1431296 conflicts between kernel-core subpackages on upgrade

2017-03-20 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, In case people didn't notice in the somewhat long analysis of the issue in the bug, the workaround is just a simple oneliner: diff --git a/kernel.spec b/kernel.spec index cb3dec8..29c198a 100644 --- a/kernel.spec +++ b/kernel.spec @@ -183,6 +183,9 @@ Summary: The Linux kernel %define

Re: [PATCHv2] Switch to more standard debuginfo generation

2017-04-12 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 11:01 -0400, Don Zickus wrote: > Mark W., > > Do you have much insight into how the below definitions would interact with > the kernel? > > > @@ -395,7 +395,14 @@ BuildRequires: pciutils-devel gettext ncurses-devel > > BuildConflicts: rhbuildsys(DiskFree) < 500Mb > >

Re: [PATCHv2] Switch to more standard debuginfo generation

2017-04-12 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Don, On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 13:45 -0400, Don Zickus wrote: > Thanks for responding. Laura already provided some good feedback. > I was curious if some of this would correctly for our non-kernel package > stuff we build. I might be reading Laura's patch wrong, but I think some of > the options

Re: [PATCHv2] Switch to more standard debuginfo generation

2017-04-12 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 10:20 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 04/12/2017 03:55 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > I am happy you seem able to use the defines instead of having to > > override the whole find-debuginfo call. Please let me know if there are > > other defines you n

Re: [PATCHv2] Switch to more standard debuginfo generation

2017-04-16 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 06:59:38PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > >> This was explicitly causing problems for me when I was working. > >> I think it was because it expected to find dynamic symbols > >> and there were none. > > > > I'll do a kernel build with it enabled and see if I can figure out

Re: [PATCHv2] Switch to more standard debuginfo generation

2017-04-19 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 20:04 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Found the issue and posted a patch upstream: > http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-maint/2017-April/005441.html > That makes sure the minisymtab support skips kernel modules, which > is what generated the errors. > [...] >

Re: [PATCHv3] Update debuginfo generation

2017-05-23 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 10:40 -0400, Don Zickus wrote: > On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 04:38:25PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > > > > Once upon a time, the kernel needed a lot of special handling to > > generate proper debuginfo as the kernel was ahead in technology. These > > days, rpm has improved

Re: proper debuginfo for embedded vDSO

2018-03-15 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Wed, 2018-03-14 at 15:12 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > The kernel still doesn't have 100% parallel debuginfo because we > can't update > the vDSO binary embedded in the the image. I'd like to see about updating > debugedit to be smart enough to do the recalculation of the buildid for both >

Re: Feature request: improved build-id generation

2018-03-15 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 11:36 +, Nick Clifton wrote: > > > I think Fedora should be able to ask its tool chain to insert the > > > extra data rather than hacking it in after the fact. > > I'll just note that another way to insert data into a linked binary > is to use a linker script fragment

Re: Feature request: improved build-id generation

2018-03-15 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 00:45 -0700, Cary Coutant wrote: > > > To inject explicit out-of-band data into the hash computation, you > > > could insert an object with nothing but a note section, or even use > > > --defsym to create a symbol table entry with your extra key(s). > > > > Fedora wants to

Re: Work-around for gcc compilation bugs?

2020-10-21 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Wed, 2020-10-21 at 20:24 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 12:27:20PM -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > Hey, > > > > I'm trying to build test kernels on my Fedora 33 machine > > and ran into: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890107 > > > > Does anyone know a