On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 07:30, Neil Baylis wrote:
> For example, would it be possible to create a block driver that does not use
> the buffer cache? I think the answer must be 'no' because the caching
> happens before the block driver gets any requests to move data.
something like dd iflag=direc
boot option:
root=/dev/mtdblock1 rootfstype=ext3 rw console=ttyS0,115200
mtdparts=phys_mapped_flash:1024k(bootloader)ro,256k(product_info),256k(system_para),128k(exception_info),128k(bootloader_env),-(reserve);gen_nand.0:128M(root),-(usr)
boot logs:
Using octmgmt0 device
TFTP from server 10.10.10
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Ajay kumar wrote:
> Where can I read about different file system features ??
> snapshots, journaling etc..
>
> Regards,
> Onkar
>
> ___
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
> http://lists.kerneln
2011/7/13 史星星(研六 福州) :
> Hi,
>
> I got a problem when trying to boot linux 2.6.32.13 on my Octeon
> CN5650 board.
>
> Booting logs below:
>
> ...omit….
>
> EXT3-fs warning: maximal mount count reached, running e2fsck is recommended
>
> kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
>
> EXT
Hi,
I got a problem when trying to boot linux 2.6.32.13 on my Octeon
CN5650 board.
Booting logs below:
...omit….
EXT3-fs warning: maximal mount count reached, running e2fsck is recommended
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3 FS on mtdblock1, internal journal
EXT3-fs: recov
I'm trying to clarify my picture of how the buffer cache works. I notice
that if I do the following:
dd if=/dev/sda7 of=/dev/null bs=10k count=100
The first time will be slow, and the second and subsequent times will be
very fast because the data are now in the buffer cache.
However, this is onl
Check this one out:
http://milindchoudhary.wordpress.com/2009/03/30/linux-boot-process/
Another one:
http://duartes.org/gustavo/blog/post/kernel-boot-process
Hope this helps,
Pavan
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 21:04, Niamathullah sharief
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 21:04, Niamathullah sharief wrote:
> Its getting confusion for me..I am telling what i understood
>
> BIOS--->POST->MBR--->Bootloader-->Kernel.
Roughly, yeah something like thatmind you, POST is a procedure
that is part of BIOS initializatio
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:15:17PM +0530, Prashant Shah wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> There are 4 branches in the staging tree
>>
>> remotes/staging/master
>> remotes/staging/ralink
>> remotes/staging/staging-linus
>> remotes/staging/staging-next
>>
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:15:17PM +0530, Prashant Shah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are 4 branches in the staging tree
>
> remotes/staging/master
> remotes/staging/ralink
> remotes/staging/staging-linus
> remotes/staging/staging-next
>
> Is the staging-linus is what Linus merges and staging-n
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:26:35PM +0530, Amit Nagal wrote:
> After all even for stream-oriented device (as in my case ) , we need
> to copy data from kernel buffer to user-space buffer ,
> and if copy can be avoided via any mechanism , it will be much faster .
Have you really measured your data
Its getting confusion for me..I am telling what i understood
BIOS--->POST->MBR--->Bootloader-->Kernel.
I thinks the above hierarchy is correct?
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:02 PM, amit mehta wrote:
> I find these two articles on this topic by the same guy extremely he
Where can I read about different file system features ??
snapshots, journaling etc..
Regards,
Onkar
___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Amit Nagal wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Tirtha Ghosh wrote:
>> Use a shared memory between user space and kernel space.
>> The same physical memory can be translated as user-space virtual address as
>> well as kernel space.
>> See more about mmap, io
14 matches
Mail list logo
