On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> > Now the default value is of both the macros is same.
> >
> > But if you want to make delayed ack timeout configurable, then I think
> you
> > should give proc interface for TCP_DELACK_MIN.
>
> Thanks Rohan. Then also I have to export TCP_DE
Hi all,
"sys_sync()" function is used in enter_suspend().
It is taking a long time, when data transfer is happening, thus taking more
time for the deivce to suspend.
I am basically does not know much about filesystems, still wondering what
sys_sync() function does?
When suspend is called before s
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Abu Rasheda
> wrote:
> I am inserting packets into Linux stack and they are accepted by
> net_rx function, but are latter dropped. What tools are available in Linux
> kernel to for debugging this issue.
>
I discovered that /proc/net/snmp files provides stats
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Abu Rasheda wrote:
> I am inserting packets into Linux stack and they are accepted by net_rx
> function, but are latter dropped. What tools are available in Linux kernel
> to for debugging this issue.
printk + dump_stack + your brain :).
thanks,
Daniel.
___
I am inserting packets into Linux stack and they are accepted by net_rx
function, but are latter dropped. What tools are available in Linux kernel
to for debugging this issue.
___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
http://lists.ker
thanks for the replies.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:42 PM, rohan puri wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Jeff Haran wrote:
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: kernelnewbies-boun...@kernelnewbies.org [mailto:kernelnewbies-
>> > boun...@kernelnewbies.org] On Behalf Of Sri Ram V
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 06:59:57PM +0530, Felix Varghese wrote:
> Does anybody have anything to add or oppose on this or would you guys
> rather have me send a patch along with my changes?
Patches are always best, we can review that and go from there.
greg k-h
___
> Now the default value is of both the macros is same.
>
> But if you want to make delayed ack timeout configurable, then I think you
> should give proc interface for TCP_DELACK_MIN.
Thanks Rohan. Then also I have to export TCP_DELACK_MAX since I think
ato cannot grow over this value.
thanks,
Dan
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> Hello,
>
> RFC2582, Section 4.2 says:
>
> "... an ACK SHOULD be generated for at least every second
> full-sized segment, and MUST be generated within 500 ms
> of the arrival of the first unacknowledged packet. ".
>
>
> I guess that the delay
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:15 PM, rohan puri wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Murali N wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Can somebody give pointers to the load balancing scheduler on Linux. I
>> hope this is the default scheduler which is used on most of the linux
>> systems on SMP environment.
>> I
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:57:13AM +0200, Mirco Tischler wrote:
> 2011/9/21 Jacky Lam :
> > Thanks Mirco. But how about if I want to download 3.0.4 source?
> >
> > Jacky
> I don't know of any public non-kernel.org mirrors of the stable branches.
>
> Greg, are there any?
Not that I know of at the
With some modification, I have finally made the skel driver work with
my device. I think I have some initial theories about the root cause
of the problems that I ran into with skel:
1) The condition if (!dev->processed_urb) is always false in the
beginning and this induces a wait without any scope
Hello,
RFC2582, Section 4.2 says:
"... an ACK SHOULD be generated for at least every second
full-sized segment, and MUST be generated within 500 ms
of the arrival of the first unacknowledged packet. ".
I guess that the delayed ACK timeout is computed in tcp_send_delayed_ack:
===
void tcp_send_
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Murali N wrote:
> Hi,
> Can somebody give pointers to the load balancing scheduler on Linux. I
> hope this is the default scheduler which is used on most of the linux
> systems on SMP environment.
> I would like to know how the scheduler takes a decision to migrat
Small correction is not a "load balance scheduler" it could be CFS.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Murali N wrote:
> Hi,
> Can somebody give pointers to the load balancing scheduler on Linux. I
> hope this is the default scheduler which is used on most of the linux
> systems on SMP environment.
I think if have git installed then LXR might do it for you.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Jacky Lam wrote:
> Thanks Mirco. But how about if I want to download 3.0.4 source?
>
> Jacky
>
> On 9/15/2011 6:08 AM, Mirco Tischler wrote:
> > 2011/9/14 Littlefield, Tyler:
> >> Hello:
> >> and I'm uns
Hi,
Can somebody give pointers to the load balancing scheduler on Linux. I
hope this is the default scheduler which is used on most of the linux
systems on SMP environment.
I would like to know how the scheduler takes a decision to migrate
some of the processes to the another core?
I have a scenar
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Mirco Tischler wrote:
> 2011/9/21 Jacky Lam :
> > Thanks Mirco. But how about if I want to download 3.0.4 source?
> >
> > Jacky
> I don't know of any public non-kernel.org mirrors of the stable branches.
>
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/v3.0
i think this i
2011/9/21 Jacky Lam :
> Thanks Mirco. But how about if I want to download 3.0.4 source?
>
> Jacky
I don't know of any public non-kernel.org mirrors of the stable branches.
Greg, are there any?
Thanks
Mirco
___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@k
19 matches
Mail list logo
