Hi,
This is probably a stupid question, but i'm not able to find the
answer. How does the networking subsystem decides which device to use
for sending the skb. Can some one please guide me to the particular
code. I seem to get lost in there :(
--
---P.K.S
Hi
Referring to Documentation/networking/netdevices.txt
a)
ndo-ndo_start_xmit if written as is will be thread safe? [Correct?]
NETIF_F_LLTX is not set only then this is true.
But dev_queue_xmit(skb) doesn't seem to take any lock, neither does
dev_hard_start_xmit. Please let me know if i'm
Hi,
I sent my task two over two days ago and didn't receive the task 03.
I already sent 6 times the task 02 answer, but I got nothing instead.
I used mutt, and a python script.
The first time that I sent was two days ago.
Has Eudyptula Challenge died ?
Is down for a few days ?
Thanks a Lot.
Hi, Pranay,
First, let's assume that you are talking about IPv4, though you did not
mention it explicitly. (The principles in IPv6 are quite similar, though)
A packet is sent out in the usual case with the ip_queue_xmit() method.
The ip_queue_xmit() method calls the ip_route_output_ports()
Hi, Pranay,
First, let's assume that you are talking about IPv4, though you did not
mention it explicitly. (The principles in IPv6 are quite similar, though)
A packet is sent out in the usual case with the ip_queue_xmit() method.
The ip_queue_xmit() method calls the ip_route_output_ports()
Hi,
Sorry, I of course discuss here your previous question about SKB
Regards,
Rami
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Rami Rosen roszenr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Pranay,
First, let's assume that you are talking about IPv4, though you did not
mention it explicitly. (The principles in IPv6 are
Eudyptula apparently has at least one human in the loop. He/she may have taken
a couple days off.
On May 3, 2014 6:10:14 AM EDT, Lucas Tanure tan...@linux.com wrote:
Hi,
I sent my task two over two days ago and didn't receive the task 03.
I already sent 6 times the task 02 answer, but I got
Hi!
Ok, I thought the scripts had run away...
But, hey thanks!
--
Lucas Tanure
+55 (19) 988176559
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Greg Freemyer greg.freem...@gmail.comwrote:
Eudyptula apparently has at least one human in the loop. He/she may have
taken a couple days off.
On May 3, 2014
Greg Freemyer wrote:
Eudyptula apparently has at least one human in the loop. He/she may have
taken a couple days off.
little wrote just last week:
Others are now taking days to get properly tested and reviewed (tasks
03, 06, and 08 have very long queues at the moment.) Don't worry if you
hi thanks for your reply. the problem is still there. At 800MHZ core its
working fine but for 1Ghz its still happening.
Any suggestion or check point I can monitor.
From: sanjeev sharma
Sent: 02 May 2014 09:22
To: Ashish
CC: Valdis Kletnieks; scottw...@freescale.com;
Hi,
I have MPC8640D based custom designed board and ported Linux 3.14 successfully.
Now I have enabled core1 and facing some issues. when I run smp Linux on it,
its booting fine but whenever I am trying to use Ethernet on tsec2, tsec3, or
tsec4 its getting panic.
Any suggestion/pointer how to
Dear Sirs/ Ma'ams,
I am an undergraduate student following the B Eng (Hons) Software
Engineering degree program at University of Westminster, UK. As for my
final year research project I am implementing a packet security
enhancement module.
In the concept, it is required to obtain the list of
On Sat, 03 May 2014 11:01:19 -0700, Hettiarachchige Hasitha Shan said:
In the concept, it is required to obtain the list of neighbors within the
LAN. I did some research online and I found out that I can obtain IPv4/ IPv6
neighbors by typing
in ip -4 neigh show or ip -6 neigh show in the
13 matches
Mail list logo
