> Please give me pointers on how to proceed.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Sarbojit Ganguly <
> unixman.linux...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 19 April 2013 09:39, sandeep kumar wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All
>>>
>>> I am doing a open-sour
On 19 April 2013 09:39, sandeep kumar wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I am doing a open-source kernel bringup on Qualcomm board. I reached till
> the successfull kernel initialization complete, and i can see the
> run_init_process() function executing successfully. But still i am not
> seeing my init process
.config file.
>
Good :-)
>
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks****
>
> Giri
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Sarbojit Ganguly [mailto:unixman.linux...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 17, 2013 5:43 PM
>
> *To:* Giridhara RP (grp)
> *Cc:* kernel
*From:* kernelnewbies-boun...@kernelnewbies.org [mailto:
> kernelnewbies-boun...@kernelnewbies.org] *On Behalf Of *Giridhara RP (grp)
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 17, 2013 1:42 PM
>
> *To:* Sarbojit Ganguly
> *Cc:* kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
> *Subject:* RE: Build error in linux-3.8.7
>
ftware Foundation, Inc.
>
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
>
>
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
>
Can you try with latest version of GCC 4.5 or later? It seems your gcc is
Hello GRP,
Can you post your toolchain (gcc) version? As you're doing this, may I
request you to try with 3.8.8?
Regards,
Sarbojit
On 17 April 2013 10:20, Giridhara RP (grp) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ** **
>
> I am new to linux kernel buidling. I have download 3.8.7 latest (stable)
> kernel from
eoh wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Sarbojit Ganguly
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Community,
>>
>> I was browsing the tree and in slub.c/ function kfree(), I found
>> "PageSlab"
>> I could not find its definition anywhere.
>>
>> A
Hello Community,
I was browsing the tree and in slub.c/ function kfree(), I found "PageSlab"
I could not find its definition anywhere.
Also, googling about it did not yield much help except for pointers to
various patches _using_ this.
Can anyone explain what it is and where it is defined (if at
My apologies as I did not get mail where the problem he faced was resolved.
Anyway, I faced almost similar issue where the problem boiled down to
the flag. So I was kind of interested.
On 14 June 2012 15:09, anish singh wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Sarbojit Ganguly
>
t you paste the code for your probe routine where you are
>> calling request_irq.
>> Are you using threaded irq?It would be difficult to diagnose the
>> problem without looking
>> at your TSP manual and your code to find out the problem.
>> >
>> >
>> &
Hi Arun,
While I agree to your pointers but he is facing the problem of
"interrupt floods" even before he touches.
IMHO the culprit could be the flag.
On 14 June 2012 12:01, Arun KS wrote:
> Hello Siddharth,
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:34 AM, siddharth saxena
> wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I need
To my understanding "IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW" is a flag which will trigger
the interrupt when the line is _low_.
Now, since you are not touching, the line remains low and satifies the
condition. Hence the interrupt is triggered by the core.
Can you change it to IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH and recheck. Please consu
Foward declaration, that is.
You can vaguely compare it to function prototypes.
On 1 June 2012 15:00, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Don, 2012-05-31 at 01:37 +0800, harryxiyou wrote:
>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Gaurav Jain wrote:
> [...]
>> > Those are forward declarations as the
Try pasting the specific parts of the code you are having trouble
understanding. One cannot be spoon-fed.
On 29 May 2012 18:53, naveen yadav wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I want to know details about TWD, MCT, MSM timer.
>
> can any body let me know.
>
> Thanks
>
> __
Hello,
Please ensure you use English as a method of communication when you
are sending mail to the list.
Thank you.
On 26 May 2012 17:42, 王哲 wrote:
>
>
> 2012/5/26 刘智猷
>>
>>
>>
>> 2012/5/26 王哲
>>>
>>> Hello Everyone
>>>I want to study process schedule.but i don't kown how to begin.
>>
Hello Dave,
I tried to explain this feature (no doubt you have explain it
perfectly) but he is looking for _how_ kernel module gets loaded and
somehow (I wonder how!) dubs the entire process as "incremental link"
!
On 23 May 2012 21:47, Dave Hylands wrote:
> Hi Somanath,
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2012
I think this might help (taking a cue from your last statement)
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-lkm/
On 23 May 2012 13:20, Sarbojit Ganguly wrote:
> Can you please elaborate on that? What exactly you are trying to find
> out and other details.
>
>
> On 23
y binding by which kernel
> modules are being inserted into running kernel.
>
> please CMIIW.
>
> Regards,
> Somanath
>
> From: Sarbojit Ganguly
> To: somanath sahoo
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 11:20 AM
> Subject: Re: Incremental Linking
>
> Soman
18 matches
Mail list logo
