On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:36:00AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> for reasons that don't need explaining, i need to rebuild my current
> 3.0.0... kernel so that it returns a "uname" version number of
> "2.whatever". i simply have an app i want to run that checks the
> output of "uname" and
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:36:00AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > for reasons that don't need explaining, i need to rebuild my current
> > 3.0.0... kernel so that it returns a "uname" version number of
> > "2.whatever". i simply have an app i want to
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:36:00AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> for reasons that don't need explaining, i need to rebuild my current
> 3.0.0... kernel so that it returns a "uname" version number of
> "2.whatever". i simply have an app i want to run that checks the
> output of "uname" and
for reasons that don't need explaining, i need to rebuild my current
3.0.0... kernel so that it returns a "uname" version number of
"2.whatever". i simply have an app i want to run that checks the
output of "uname" and if it doesn't see a major number of "2", it goes
a bit squirrelly.
there'
