On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Loris Degioanni wrote:
> On 8/20/2014 2:33 AM, Rohan Puri wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Loris Degioanni
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sure, here's some more context.
>>>
>>> I'm one of the developers of sysdig (www.sysdig.org), a tool that
>>> captures syste
On 8/20/2014 2:33 AM, Rohan Puri wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Loris Degioanni wrote:
>> Sure, here's some more context.
>>
>> I'm one of the developers of sysdig (www.sysdig.org), a tool that
>> captures system calls and uses them to offer advanced system monitoring.
>> One of the fe
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Loris Degioanni wrote:
> Sure, here's some more context.
>
> I'm one of the developers of sysdig (www.sysdig.org), a tool that
> captures system calls and uses them to offer advanced system monitoring.
> One of the features that our diver offers is the tcpdump-der
Sure, here's some more context.
I'm one of the developers of sysdig (www.sysdig.org), a tool that
captures system calls and uses them to offer advanced system monitoring.
One of the features that our diver offers is the tcpdump-derived concept
of "snaplen": when a system call with a buffer is c
On 8/19/2014 9:10 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:38:24AM -0700, Loris Degioanni wrote:
>> (resending making sure this is not part of another thread)
>>
>> I'm looking for an efficient way to determine the type of an fd (file,
>> socket...) given its number, from a kernel module.
>
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 08:38:24AM -0700, Loris Degioanni wrote:
> (resending making sure this is not part of another thread)
>
> I'm looking for an efficient way to determine the type of an fd (file,
> socket...) given its number, from a kernel module.
You don't have a "number" from within the
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:38:24 -0700, Loris Degioanni said:
> I'm looking for an efficient way to determine the type of an fd (file,
> socket...) given its number, from a kernel module.
What problem are you trying to solve here? There may be a better API for
your problem. So step back - what are
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Loris Degioanni wrote:
> (resending making sure this is not part of another thread)
>
> I'm looking for an efficient way to determine the type of an fd (file,
> socket...) given its number, from a kernel module.
> The closest thing I found by looking at the kernel
(resending making sure this is not part of another thread)
I'm looking for an efficient way to determine the type of an fd (file,
socket...) given its number, from a kernel module.
The closest thing I found by looking at the kernel sources is
sockfd_lookup(), which works but is limited to tellin
On August 18, 2014 8:46:16 PM EDT, Loris Degioanni wrote:
>I'm looking for an efficient way to determine the type of an fd (file,
>socket...) given its number, from a kernel module.
>The closest thing I found by looking at the kernel sources is
>sockfd_lookup(), which works but is limited to t
I'm looking for an efficient way to determine the type of an fd (file,
socket...) given its number, from a kernel module.
The closest thing I found by looking at the kernel sources is
sockfd_lookup(), which works but is limited to telling me if the fd is a
socket or not.
Is there something else
11 matches
Mail list logo
