On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Abu Rasheda rcpilot2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Mulyadi Santosa
mulyadi.sant...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Abu Rasheda rcpilot2...@gmail.com wrote:
I have my implementation of socket APIs,
I
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Vipul Jain vipu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Kernel alias,
I am a newbie and I am trying to figure out ways where in I can recover the
Linux in below two scenarios:
1. my specific process hangs.
how to recover i cannot tell you, because it is application specific
assuming one mother process is monitoring 10 child process, so inside each
child process, simply just setup a PERIODIC (eg, per 5 sec) mechanism to
toggle a binary variables through IPC means. It will be reset when the
mother process go around checking all the variable status and, if not
You could also look at using existing s/w for monitoring processes like monit.
I don't know your exact usecase but you could make your process as a
'service' and have something like systemd or upstart monitor it. These
tools will typically 'restart' the hung process on detection.
-mandeep
On
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Mandeep Sandhu
mandeepsandhu@gmail.comwrote:
assuming one mother process is monitoring 10 child process, so inside
each
child process, simply just setup a PERIODIC (eg, per 5 sec) mechanism to
toggle a binary variables through IPC means. It will be
Hi All,
I have an make file like this
obj-m := abc.o
all:
make -C /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build M=$(PWD) modules
clean:
make -C /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build M=$(PWD) clean
when i do the make i am getting this error
*make: Nothing to be done for `all'.*
Add a tab after obj-m (tab) :=abc.o and after make too
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Anil Joshi aj27...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have an make file like this
obj-m := abc.o
all:
make -C /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build M=$(PWD) modules
clean:
make -C
Thanks
i did that now i am getting this error
make
make-C /lib/modules/2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64/build M=/root/Desktop/exp1
modules
make: *** /lib/modules/2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64/build: No such file or
directory. Stop.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Robert Clove cloverob...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Anil Joshi aj27...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks
i did that now i am getting this error
make
make-C /lib/modules/2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64/build M=/root/Desktop/exp1
modules
make: *** /lib/modules/2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64/build: No such file or
directory. Stop.
Ker
On Dec 4, 2013 3:42 PM, Sudip Mukherjee sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Anil Joshi aj27...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks
i did that now i am getting this error
make
make-C /lib/modules/2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64/build M=/root/Desktop/exp1
modules
make: ***
Whats the error?
Hi Anil
Please do not top post.
For your error , please verify if
/lib/modules/2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64/build is really linking to the folder
containing the kernel files.
Regards
Sudip
Thats the issue the link is not there how to create the link.
On your mails please
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Guibin(Bill) Tian gbt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
Right now, I am trying to do such a thing.
If a computer has multiple interface A and B, assume the packet is from
device A.
At ip layer, before the packet is transmitted to transport layer, I change
the
Hi kernelnewbies!
As I do not get any answer from the other MLs, this goes here, too.
Maybe there is just too much noise in lkml... never mind!
On 03-12-2013 16:57:08, Matthias Beyer wrote:
Hi,
Greg-KHs email bot tells me to send this message to a ML. It suggests
to send it to this list or
On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 16:08:52 +0100, Matthias Beyer said:
How to test my code beside compiling it? Do I even have a possibility
to test it or should I just send it to you?
If at all possible, you should cross-compile for an appropriate architecture
and actually boot and test the code in
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Peter Teoh htmldevelo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Guibin(Bill) Tian gbt...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi there,
Right now, I am trying to do such a thing.
If a computer has multiple interface A and B, assume the packet is from
device A.
At
Thanks Peter for your explanation. But in fact, I am not going to touch
transport layer. The work shall be done inside the call stack of ip_rcv().
In ip layer, there is no specific process information, so the process
assignment shouldn't be a problem.
At the application layer, each application
rcpilot2...@gmail.com wrote:
I have my implementation of socket APIs,
I sock_unregister(AF_INET); sock_register(inet_family_ops), this
replaces
kernel resident socket related calls with my socket related calls. My code
is loaded as kernel module.
My question, is Linux kernel able to call
On 04-12-2013 10:17:23, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 16:08:52 +0100, Matthias Beyer said:
How to test my code beside compiling it? Do I even have a possibility
to test it or should I just send it to you?
If at all possible, you should cross-compile for an
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Bernd Petrovitsch
be...@petrovitsch.priv.at wrote:
On Die, 2013-12-03 at 08:38 -0500, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 20:35:41 +0800, said:
For debugging purpose, I want something like 'getchar()' that can pause
execution in the module
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Peter Teoh htmldevelo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Vipul,
I have seen this in a number of commercial software running on RHEL, and
on other realtime OS as well. The watchdog mechanism is always working in
pair: userspace feeding the dog (in the kernel). (btw,
On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 16:45:44 -0800, Vipul Jain said:
If you don't mind can you please provide me more insight as what can be
false alarm I can encounter to move pet inside kernel module?
The issue isn't false alarms - it's failure to alarm when it should.
The problem is that it's possible for
yes, exactly - what u are describing is called kdb. don't mixed up with
kgdb.
kdb: this is debugging on the same computer - so no serial ports
connection are needed. once exception occurred, you will be popped into a
special debugger screen. problem is that now this debugger is running
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Vipul Jain vipu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Peter Teoh htmldevelo...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Vipul,
I have seen this in a number of commercial software running on RHEL, and
on other realtime OS as well. The watchdog mechanism is
Although /dev/watchdog is available in usermode, but nothing should stop
you to write to it from a kernel thread.
Rajat
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Peter Teoh htmldevelo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Vipul Jain vipu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Rajat Sharma fs.ra...@gmail.com wrote:
Although /dev/watchdog is available in usermode, but nothing should stop
you to write to it from a kernel thread.
Rajat
I don't think /dev/watchdog (literally, I meant) is available in the
kernel. It is accessible in
Thanks your replies! I found the target.
2013/12/5 上午9:34 於 Peter Teoh htmldevelo...@gmail.com 寫道：
yes, exactly - what u are describing is called kdb. don't mixed up
with kgdb.
kdb: this is debugging on the same computer - so no serial ports
connection are needed. once exception
Hi Vipul,
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Vipul Jain vipu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Kernel alias,
I am a newbie and I am trying to figure out ways where in I can recover the
Linux in below two scenarios:
1. my specific process hangs.
2. kernel gets hung partially or completely.
I have done
27 matches
Mail list logo
