> On 20 April 2018 at 07:28 Aleix Roca Nonell wrote:
>
> I just wanted to ask the same question. I'm still doing the challenge
> but it has been amost two months since I sent my last solution and
> there has not been any answer yet (except the usual auto-response of
>
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:29:33PM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 06:29:07PM +0200, Philipp Klocke wrote:
> > > The gain is stopping a warning that clutters the output log of clang.
> >
> > Well, you should not be using
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 06:29:07PM +0200, Philipp Klocke wrote:
> The gain is stopping a warning that clutters the output log of clang.
Well, you should not be using clang anyway. It is known to miscompile
the kernel.
> To improve readability, one can drop the ifdef-structure and just keep
> the
Also, please don't cross-post with moderated lists, that's just
annoying.
___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:54:26AM +0200, Philipp Klocke wrote:
> This patch is motivated by the clang warning Wconstant-logical-operand,
> issued when logically comparing a variable to a constant integer that is
> neither 1 nor 0. It happens for sched_feat(x) when sysctl_sched_features
> is
Hello,
I just wanted to ask the same question. I'm still doing the challenge
but it has been amost two months since I sent my last solution and
there has not been any answer yet (except the usual auto-response of
task received). Does somebody knows if it is still alive even for old
challengers?