On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 11:36 AM Valdis Klētnieks
wrote:
> ...
> It turns out that the C keyword 'volatile' usually doesn't actually do what
> needs to happen if a variable actually *is* volatile and subject to change
> while the executing thread isn't looking.
>
> There's a good documentation
Thanks a lot Valdis. These are very helpful pointers to look into.
Regards,
Ankit
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 10:06 PM Valdis Klētnieks
wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Feb 2022 23:26:54 +0530, Ankit Pandey said:
>
> > And I was asked to verify if there is some specific meaning is attached
> to
> > comment here
On Tue, 08 Feb 2022 23:26:54 +0530, Ankit Pandey said:
> And I was asked to verify if there is some specific meaning is attached to
> comment here (which was causing the issue).
> I would be glad you could explain me how should I approach this issue? One
> way would
> be to rewrite that these
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 4:15 AM Ankit Pandey wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
> I had submitted following patch:
>
> ```
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_pwrctrl.h | 12 ++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_pwrctrl.h
>
