On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 20:57:24 -0600, WyoFlippa said:
> I'm actually happy with the existing boot schemes. In this case, the
> driver is going to validate a signed image (U-Boot or Linux) before it
> is programmed into the flash memory. Although the image is validated
> when booting, it is one
Hi Valdis,
On 1/23/2020 10:49 AM, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 22:27:01 -0600, WyoFlippa said:
I'm working on a driver that would verify a Linux or U-Boot image is
secure and I need to pass parameters such as the public key, starting
address, etc.
This is actually a lot harder
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 22:27:01 -0600, WyoFlippa said:
> I'm working on a driver that would verify a Linux or U-Boot image is
> secure and I need to pass parameters such as the public key, starting
> address, etc.
This is actually a lot harder to do properly than it looks, especially if
you're
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 10:27:01PM -0600, WyoFlippa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on a driver that would verify a Linux or U-Boot image is secure
> and I need to pass parameters such as the public key, starting address, etc.
> I'd heard in talking to developers that IOCTLs are frowned upon. I also
Hi,
I'm working on a driver that would verify a Linux or U-Boot image is
secure and I need to pass parameters such as the public key, starting
address, etc. I'd heard in talking to developers that IOCTLs are frowned
upon. I also found this article that seems to indicate that using sysfs
or
