On Fri, 27 May 2016, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 08:07:17AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > next question about exporting kernel headers, this one related to
> > the content placed under include/uapi/.
> >
> > is there any rationale for header files to be living under
> >
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 08:07:17AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> next question about exporting kernel headers, this one related to
> the content placed under include/uapi/.
>
> is there any rationale for header files to be living under
> include/uapi/ if they're not listed in the
On Fri, 27 May 2016, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> "Robert P. J. Day" writes:
>
> > while i'm here, some pedantry ... what is the point of adding a
> > header file somewhere under include/uapi/ without
> > *immediately* adding it to the Kbuild file so that it's exported?
>
> I
On Fri, 27 May 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> next question about exporting kernel headers, this one related to
> the content placed under include/uapi/.
>
> is there any rationale for header files to be living under
> include/uapi/ if they're not listed in the corresponding
> Kbuild file
next question about exporting kernel headers, this one related to
the content placed under include/uapi/.
is there any rationale for header files to be living under
include/uapi/ if they're not listed in the corresponding
Kbuild file for export?
for example, in include/uapi/drm, there are