t; Just wait you'll get it, in the meantime continue reading about
>>>> Linux =)
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015, 6:38 PM Lucas Tanure <tan...@linux.com
>>>> <mailto:tan...@linux.com>> wr
On Wed, 30 May 2018 20:54 +0300, Ozgur Kara wrote:
> 30.05.2018, 20:16, "Alexander Ivanov" :
> > Hi All,
>
> Hello
>
> > What would be right place to ask questions about LSM?
>
> I think can ask your questions to LSM kernel e-mail list:
>
>
On Wed, 30 May 2018 14:05 -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2018 10:37:25 -0700, you said:
>
> > First, theoretical, I suppose: what were the reasons to effectively disable
> > dynamic loading of LSM ?
>
> Because that implies the system was up without the LSM loaded - at
On Wed, 30 May 2018 13:25 -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2018 10:16:13 -0700, Alexander Ivanov said:
> > Hi All,
> > What would be right place to ask questions about LSM?
>
> linux-security-module
>
> is where that development was done, bu
On Wed, 30 May 2018 20:12 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:37:25AM -0700, Alexander Ivanov wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 May 2018 13:25 -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> > > What question do you have about it?
> >
> > There are a couple, actuall
Hi All,
What would be right place to ask questions about LSM?
___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
!
> Regards
>
> Ozgur
>
> 31.05.2018, 01:12, "Alexander Ivanov" :
> > On Wed, 30 May 2018 14:26 -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> >> On Wed, 30 May 2018 11:13:31 -0700, Alexander Ivanov said:
> >>
> >> > > There's some support for one
Thibaut,
On Thu, 31 May 2018 23:11 +0200, Thibaut Sautereau wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 03:10:37PM -0700, Alexander Ivanov wrote:
> > I do no need blobs, as I said, it's stateless.
> > The question was how to register a subset of hooks that may ove
Hi All,
I have udev rule defined on a
DEVPATH="/dev/mydev0",..., ACTION="remove", ..., RUN+="/path/to/script"
When does /path/to/script is executed in respect to module's remove() and
exit() ?
Thx,
--
Alex Ivanov
amiva...@fastmail.com
___
Greg,
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 08:56 +0100, Greg KH <g...@kroah.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 03:36:44PM -0800, Alexander Ivanov wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have udev rule defined on a
> >
> > DEVPATH="/dev/mydev0",..., ACTION="remove&
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:05 +0100, Greg KH <g...@kroah.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 08:44:20AM -0800, Alexander Ivanov wrote:
> > Greg,
> >
> > On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 08:56 +0100, Greg KH <g...@kroah.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 a
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 12:09 -07:00, Valdis Klētnieks
wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 12:01:28 -0700, you said:
>
> > > static const struct pci_device_id pch_gpio_pcidev_id[] = {
> > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x8803) },
> > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ROHM, 0x8014) },
> > > {
Hi,
I have a hardware platform with Skylake i7-6500 CPU and Skylake-Y PCH
southbridge, running 4.8.5 kernel fc25. The platform has 12 GPIO pins, however,
none are available. gpio-pch driver does not support D31:F2 device that manages
GPIO. Am I missing something here?
Cheers,
--Alex
Valdis,
Thanks for quick response!
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:46 -07:00, Valdis Klētnieks
wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:58:53 -0700, "Alexander Ivanov" said:
>
> > I have a hardware platform with Skylake i7-6500 CPU and Skylake-Y PCH
> > southbridge, running 4.8.5 k
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:25 -07:00, Alexander Ivanov
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 12:09 -07:00, Valdis Klētnieks
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 12:01:28 -0700, you said:
>>
>> > > static const struct pci_device_id pch_gpio_pcidev_id[] = {
>> &g
On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 12:31 -07:00, Valdis Klētnieks
wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 15:40:59 -0700, "Alexander Ivanov" said:
>
> (Adding likely knowledgeable people to the recipients)
>
> Jean, Andy, Linus: The situation thus far: Alexander has a system with this
&
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:58 -07:00, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:48:45AM -0400, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 11:40:34 +0300, Andy Shevchenko said:
> >
> > > Yes. Most of the SoCs from Intel use GPIO IP based on Chassis
> > > specification,
> > > the
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 09:39 -07:00, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> How come that this device is GPIO?
> I mean what makes you, guys, to come to this conclusion?
>
Intel document 332996-002EN [1] chapter 28 says GPP_* groups are accessible
through the PCH Sideband Interface, while 332690-004EN
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 10:39 -07:00, Alexander Ivanov
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 03:12 -07:00, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> >
> > Usually to check this is better to run
> > grep -H 15 /sys/bus/acpi/devices/*/status
> > which return you the list of *pr
On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 01:41 -07:00, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> >
> > Obviously, I am wrong here. However, the question stands, is there linux
> > kernel support for Intel PCH GPIO?
>
> Yes. Most of the SoCs from Intel use GPIO IP based on Chassis specification,
> the drivers for which are
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 03:12 -07:00, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> Usually to check this is better to run
> grep -H 15 /sys/bus/acpi/devices/*/status
> which return you the list of *present and available* ACPI devices.
It looks like INT344B device is neither present nor available. This
On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 18:50 -07:00, Valdis Klētnieks
wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 12:38:34 -0700, "Alexander Ivanov" said:
>
> > This is fedora 25 running 4.8.6 kernel.
>
> It probably won't fix the problem, but you should upgrade if at all possible.
> You're n
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:47 -07:00, Valentin Vidić
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 02:04:44PM -0700, Alexander Ivanov wrote:
> > It took me (or rather the vendor) to update the firmware and enable INT344B
> > controller. After update, the system enumerates gpio controller
>
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 04:08 -07:00, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> There is no issue with kernel. ACPI tables provided by firmware, so,
> vendor of your firmware decided to turn off this device.
>
It took me (or rather the vendor) to update the firmware and enable INT344B
controller. After
Hello,
I posted this message to linix-gpio group about a week ago, but it didn't get
any reply so far; thus trying here.
I am developing a driver for PCIe-based device that needs to receive external
signals through on-board GPIOs. The target platform is Intel-based board
running Fedora 34 kernel
25 matches
Mail list logo
