On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 04:15:04PM +0100, Vasily Gorbik wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:27:15PM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
@@ -33,10 +33,6 @@ int s390_verify_sig(const char *kernel, unsigned long
kernel_len)
On 11/20/22 17:25, Sourabh Jain wrote:
The way memory hot remove is handled on PowerPC, it is hard to update
the elfcorehdr without memory_notify args.
On PowePC memblock data structure is used to prepare elfcorehdr for kdump.
Since the notifier used for memory hotplug crash handler get
On 11/20/22 17:25, Sourabh Jain wrote:
On architectures like PowerPC the crash notes are available for all
possible CPUs. So let's populate the elfcorehdr for all possible
CPUs having crash notes to avoid updating elfcorehdr during in-kernel
crash update on CPU hotplug events.
The similar
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 02:20:31PM -0800, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 12:02:55PM +, Breno Leitao wrote:
...
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> > index 3e3230cccaa7..970b277d02a6 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> > +++
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:27:15PM +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> @@ -33,10 +33,6 @@ int s390_verify_sig(const char *kernel, unsigned long
> kernel_len)
> unsigned long sig_len;
> int ret;
>
> -
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 10:33:12AM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
Leaving in the whole thing for newly added people.
> On 18/09/2022 11:10, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> > On 19/08/2022 19:17, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> >> The altera_edac panic notifier performs some data collection with
On 19/08/2022 19:17, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> Commit 8d470a45d1a6 ("panic: add option to dump all CPUs backtraces in
> panic_print")
> introduced a setting for the "panic_print" kernel parameter to allow
> users to request a NMI backtrace on panic. Problem is that the panic_print
> handling
On 18/09/2022 11:10, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> On 19/08/2022 19:17, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
>> The altera_edac panic notifier performs some data collection with
>> regards errors detected; such code relies in the regmap layer to
>> perform reads/writes, so the code is abstracted and there
On 19/08/2022 19:17, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> Currently there is no way to show the callback names for registered,
> unregistered or executed notifiers. This is very useful for debug
> purposes, hence add this functionality here in the form of notifiers'
> tracepoints, one per operation.
>
>
On 20/10/2022 19:22, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 18:53:43 -0300
> "Guilherme G. Piccoli" wrote:
>
>> Could you pick it in your tree? Or do you prefer that I re-send as a
>> solo patch, with your ACK?
>
> I wasn't sure there were any dependencies on this. If not, I can take it.
>
On 19/08/2022 19:17, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> The alpha panic notifier has some code issues, not following
> the conventions of other notifiers. Also, it might halt the
> machine but still it is set to run as early as possible, which
> doesn't seem to be a good idea.
>
> So, let's clean the
On 19/08/2022 19:17, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> Although many notifiers are mentioned in the comments, the panic
> notifiers infrastructure is not. Also, the file contains some
> trailing whitespaces. Fix both issues here.
>
> Cc: Arjan van de Ven
> Cc: Cong Wang
> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej
12 matches
Mail list logo
