Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] x86/tdx: Add kexec support

2024-01-30 Thread Nikolay Borisov
On 30.01.24 г. 15:43 ч., Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 1/24/24 13:55, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: The patchset adds bits and pieces to get kexec (and crashkernel) work on TDX guest. The last patch implements CPU offlining according to the approved ACPI spec change poposal[1]. It unlocks kexec with

Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] x86/tdx: Add kexec support

2024-01-30 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 03:59:34PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 3:34 PM Kirill A. Shutemov > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 02:43:15PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 1/24/24 13:55, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > > The patchset adds bits and pieces to get

Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] x86/tdx: Add kexec support

2024-01-30 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 3:34 PM Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 02:43:15PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 1/24/24 13:55, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > The patchset adds bits and pieces to get kexec (and crashkernel) work on > > > TDX guest. > > > > > > The last patch

Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] x86/tdx: Add kexec support

2024-01-30 Thread Kirill A. Shutemov
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 02:43:15PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 1/24/24 13:55, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > The patchset adds bits and pieces to get kexec (and crashkernel) work on > > TDX guest. > > > > The last patch implements CPU offlining according to the approved ACPI > > spec change

RE: [PATCHv6 00/16] x86/tdx: Add kexec support

2024-01-30 Thread Huang, Kai
> Hi Kirill, > > I have a very basic question: is there a reason why this series does not > revert > commit cb8eb06d50fc, "x86/virt/tdx: Disable TDX host support when kexec is > enabled"? > Hi Paolo, (Sorry I am replying using Outlook) This series is for TDX guest, but not TDX host. For TDX

Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] x86/tdx: Add kexec support

2024-01-30 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 1/24/24 13:55, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: The patchset adds bits and pieces to get kexec (and crashkernel) work on TDX guest. The last patch implements CPU offlining according to the approved ACPI spec change poposal[1]. It unlocks kexec with all CPUs visible in the target kernel. It requires

[PATCH] kexec: should use uchunk for user buffer increasing

2024-01-30 Thread yang.zhang
From: "yang.zhang" Because of alignment requirement in kexec-tools, there is no problem for user buffer increasing when loading segments. But when coping, the step is uchunk, so we should use uchunk not mchunk. Signed-off-by: yang.zhang --- kernel/kexec_core.c | 8 1 file changed, 4

[PATCH] Fix building on x86_64 with binutils 2.41

2024-01-30 Thread Michel Lind via B4 Relay
e-commit: 94fbe64fb22d61726ca0c0996987574b6c783c19 change-id: 20240130-fix-binutils-2-41-7642ab3b6ee7 Best regards, -- Michel Lind ___ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec