On 26/12/2021 22:45, Dave Young wrote:
> On 12/25/21 at 04:21pm, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> [...]
> Hi Guilherme, yes, I have the same concern. But there could be more
> things like the panic_print in the future, it looks odd to have more
> kernel cmdline params though.
>
Agreed! We're on
On 12/25/21 at 04:21pm, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> On 23/12/2021 22:35, Dave Young wrote:
> > Hi Guilherme,
> > [...]
> > If only the doc update, I think it is fine to be another follup-up
> > patch.
> >
> > About your 1st option in patch log, there is crash_kexec_post_notifiers
> > kernel
On 23/12/2021 22:35, Dave Young wrote:
> Hi Guilherme,
> [...]
> If only the doc update, I think it is fine to be another follup-up
> patch.
>
> About your 1st option in patch log, there is crash_kexec_post_notifiers
> kernel param which can be used to switch on panic notifiers before kdump
>
Hi Guilherme,
On 12/22/21 at 09:34am, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> On 22/12/2021 08:45, Dave Young wrote:
> > Hi Guilherme,
> >
> > Thanks for you patch. Could you add kexec list for any following up
> > patches? This could change kdump behavior so let's see if any comments
> > from kexec
On 22/12/2021 08:45, Dave Young wrote:
> Hi Guilherme,
>
> Thanks for you patch. Could you add kexec list for any following up
> patches? This could change kdump behavior so let's see if any comments
> from kexec list.
>
> Kudos for the lore+lei tool so that I can catch this by seeing this
>
Hi Guilherme,
Thanks for you patch. Could you add kexec list for any following up
patches? This could change kdump behavior so let's see if any comments
from kexec list.
Kudos for the lore+lei tool so that I can catch this by seeing this
coming into Andrews tree :)
On 11/09/21 at 05:28pm,
