> Am 02.04.2021 um 12:16 schrieb Simon Horman :
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:58:28AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 23.03.21 11:01, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> Let's properly support dumping any kind of "System RAM" that is not on the
>>> top level of the kernel resource tree in
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:58:28AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 23.03.21 11:01, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > Let's properly support dumping any kind of "System RAM" that is not on the
> > top level of the kernel resource tree in /proc/iomem, processing any
> > /proc/iomem entry that
On 23.03.21 11:01, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Let's properly support dumping any kind of "System RAM" that is not on the
top level of the kernel resource tree in /proc/iomem, processing any
/proc/iomem entry that contains "System RAM". In addition, increase
the maximum number of crash memory
Let's properly support dumping any kind of "System RAM" that is not on the
top level of the kernel resource tree in /proc/iomem, processing any
/proc/iomem entry that contains "System RAM". In addition, increase
the maximum number of crash memory ranges to fully support virtio-mem
even in corner
