Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: kdump: Function supplement and performance optimization

2022-11-15 Thread Leizhen (ThunderTown)
On 2022/11/15 21:30, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 08:18:21PM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: >> On 2022/11/15 19:58, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 05:03:17PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: v2 --> v3: 1. Discard patch 3 in v2, a cleanup patch. >>> >>> Do

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: kdump: Function supplement and performance optimization

2022-11-15 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 08:18:21PM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: > On 2022/11/15 19:58, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 05:03:17PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: > >> v2 --> v3: > >> 1. Discard patch 3 in v2, a cleanup patch. > > > > Do you plan to respin this series, addressing the v

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: kdump: Function supplement and performance optimization

2022-11-15 Thread Leizhen (ThunderTown)
On 2022/11/15 19:58, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 05:03:17PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: >> v2 --> v3: >> 1. Discard patch 3 in v2, a cleanup patch. > > Do you plan to respin this series, addressing the various comments on v3? Yes, I haven't figured out where to make DEFAULT_CRASH_K

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: kdump: Function supplement and performance optimization

2022-11-15 Thread Will Deacon
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 05:03:17PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: > v2 --> v3: > 1. Discard patch 3 in v2, a cleanup patch. Do you plan to respin this series, addressing the various comments on v3? Will ___ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://l

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: kdump: Function supplement and performance optimization

2022-10-26 Thread john . p . donnelly
On 10/14/22 11:29 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 06:46:35PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: On 10/06/22 at 09:55am, john.p.donne...@oracle.com wrote: What is the progress of this series ? Without this patch set we are seeing larger crashkernel=896M failures on Arm with Linux-6.0

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: kdump: Function supplement and performance optimization

2022-10-14 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 06:46:35PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: > On 10/06/22 at 09:55am, john.p.donne...@oracle.com wrote: > > What is the progress of this series ? > > > > Without this patch set we are seeing larger crashkernel=896M failures on > > Arm with Linux-6.0.rc7. This larger value is nee

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: kdump: Function supplement and performance optimization

2022-10-14 Thread John Donnelly
On 10/13/22 05:46, Baoquan He wrote: On 10/06/22 at 09:55am, john.p.donne...@oracle.com wrote: On 8/1/22 9:47 PM, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: .. Do you have plan to pick this series so that it can be taken into 5.20 rc-1~3? Hi, Catalin: Only function reserve_crashkernel() is modifie

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: kdump: Function supplement and performance optimization

2022-10-13 Thread Baoquan He
On 10/06/22 at 09:55am, john.p.donne...@oracle.com wrote: > On 8/1/22 9:47 PM, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: .. > > > Do you have plan to pick this series so that it can be taken into 5.20 > > > rc-1~3? > > > > Hi, Catalin: > >Only function reserve_crashkernel() is modified in these two pat

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: kdump: Function supplement and performance optimization

2022-10-06 Thread john . p . donnelly
On 8/1/22 9:47 PM, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: On 2022/8/1 16:20, Baoquan He wrote: Hi Catalin, On 07/11/22 at 05:03pm, Zhen Lei wrote: v2 --> v3: 1. Discard patch 3 in v2, a cleanup patch. v1 --> v2: 1. Update the commit message of Patch 1, explicitly indicates that "crashkernel=X,high"

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: kdump: Function supplement and performance optimization

2022-08-01 Thread Baoquan He
Hi Catalin, On 07/11/22 at 05:03pm, Zhen Lei wrote: > v2 --> v3: > 1. Discard patch 3 in v2, a cleanup patch. > > v1 --> v2: > 1. Update the commit message of Patch 1, explicitly indicates that > "crashkernel=X,high" >is specified but "crashkernel=Y,low" is not specified. > 2. Drop Patch 4-5