On 26/02/2023 02:44, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 17:35:10 -0300 "Guilherme G. Piccoli"
> wrote:
> [...]
>> Notice that while at it, I got rid of the "crash_kexec_post_notifiers"
>> local copy in panic(). This was introduced by commit b26e27ddfd2a
>> ("kexec: use core_param for
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 17:35:10 -0300 "Guilherme G. Piccoli"
wrote:
> Commit 8d470a45d1a6 ("panic: add option to dump all CPUs backtraces in
> panic_print")
> introduced a setting for the "panic_print" kernel parameter to allow
> users to request a NMI backtrace on panic. Problem is that the
On 14/02/2023 11:46, Petr Mladek wrote:
> [...]
>> My understanding is that it's a mechanism to prevent some concurrency,
>> in case some other CPU modify this variable while panic() is running.
>> I find it very unlikely, hence I removed it - but if people consider
>> this copy needed, I can
On Fri 2023-02-10 17:35:10, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> Commit 8d470a45d1a6 ("panic: add option to dump all CPUs backtraces in
> panic_print")
> introduced a setting for the "panic_print" kernel parameter to allow
> users to request a NMI backtrace on panic. Problem is that the panic_print
>
Commit 8d470a45d1a6 ("panic: add option to dump all CPUs backtraces in
panic_print")
introduced a setting for the "panic_print" kernel parameter to allow
users to request a NMI backtrace on panic. Problem is that the panic_print
handling happens after the secondary CPUs are already disabled,
