Re: [PATCH 00/11] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function

2021-08-09 Thread Tom Lendacky
On 8/8/21 8:41 PM, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On 7/27/21 3:26 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote: >> This patch series provides a generic helper function, prot_guest_has(), >> to replace the sme_active(), sev_active(), sev_es_active() and >> mem_encrypt_active() functions. >> >> It is

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function

2021-08-08 Thread Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan
Hi Tom, On 7/27/21 3:26 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote: This patch series provides a generic helper function, prot_guest_has(), to replace the sme_active(), sev_active(), sev_es_active() and mem_encrypt_active() functions. It is expected that as new protected virtualization technologies are added to

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function

2021-07-28 Thread Christian König
Am 28.07.21 um 00:26 schrieb Tom Lendacky: This patch series provides a generic helper function, prot_guest_has(), to replace the sme_active(), sev_active(), sev_es_active() and mem_encrypt_active() functions. It is expected that as new protected virtualization technologies are added to the

Re: [PATCH 00/11] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function

2021-07-27 Thread Tom Lendacky
On 7/27/21 5:26 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote: > This patch series provides a generic helper function, prot_guest_has(), > to replace the sme_active(), sev_active(), sev_es_active() and > mem_encrypt_active() functions. > > It is expected that as new protected virtualization technologies are > added to