Re: [Query] ARM64 kaslr support - randomness, seeding and kdump

Hi Mark, On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 5:22 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 01:44:16AM +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: >> 4. Accordingly, I wanted to get opinions on whether arm64 timer count is a >> good >> entropy source on platforms which indeed support

Re: [PATCH] arm64: Add support to supply 'kaslr-seed' to secondary kernel

Hello Akashi, On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:35 AM, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > Hello Akashi, > > Thanks for the review comments. > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 8:00 AM, AKASHI Takahiro > wrote: >> Bhupesh, >> >> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 01:49:40AM +0530,

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dt-ops: Add helper API to dump fdt blob

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Dave Young wrote: > On 04/16/18 at 08:39pm, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: >> Hi Dave, >> >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Dave Young wrote: >> > Hi Bhupesh, >> > >> > On 04/03/18 at 07:28pm, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: >> >> Hi James,

Re: [Xen-devel] RFC Xen signature verification for kexec

>>> On 23.04.18 at 12:25, wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:55:45AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 20.04.18 at 21:12, wrote: >> > Two options for signature verification in Xen >> > >> > This proposal outlines two options under

[PATCH v2 1/2] dt-ops: Add helper API to dump fdt blob

At several occasions it would be useful to dump the fdt blob being passed to the second (kexec/kdump) kernel when '-d' flag is specified while invoking kexec/kdump. This allows one to look at the device-tree fields that is being passed to the secondary kernel and accordingly debug issues. This

[PATCH v2 2/2] kexec-arm64: Add functionality to dump 2nd dtb

Since during the arm64 kexec_load()/kdump invocation, the dtb is passed to the second kernel, it is sometimes useful to dump the dtb contents (to verify the correctness of the same). This patch adds this feature which is enabled when '-d' flag is used with kexec command line invocation.

[PATCH v2 0/2] Add capability to dump fdt blob for arm64 platforms

Changes since v1: - v1 can be viewed here: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2018-April/020407.html - No functional changes: Just added a cover letter to explain the background better and also capture some details on where I found this patchset handy. Also added

Re: [Xen-devel] RFC Xen signature verification for kexec

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:55:45AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 20.04.18 at 21:12, wrote: > > Two options for signature verification in Xen > > > > This proposal outlines two options under consideration for enhancing > > Xen to support signature verification of

Re: [Xen-devel] RFC Xen signature verification for kexec

>>> On 20.04.18 at 21:12, wrote: > Two options for signature verification in Xen > > This proposal outlines two options under consideration for enhancing > Xen to support signature verification of kexec loaded images. The > first option is essentially to mirror Linux