On 2021/12/30 0:51, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 11:04:21PM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>> Chen Zhou and I tried to share the code because of a suggestion. After so
>> many
>> attempts, it doesn't seem to fit to make generic. Or maybe I haven't figured
>> out a good
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 11:04:21PM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
> Chen Zhou and I tried to share the code because of a suggestion. After so many
> attempts, it doesn't seem to fit to make generic. Or maybe I haven't figured
> out a good solution yet.
Well, you learned a very important
On 2021/12/29 18:46, Dave Young wrote:
> On 12/29/21 at 11:03am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 03:27:48PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>>> So I think you can unify the parse_crashkernel* in x86 first with just
>>> one function. And leave the further improvements to later work.
On 2021/12/29 18:38, Dave Young wrote:
> On 12/29/21 at 11:11am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 03:45:12PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>>> BTW, I would suggest to wait for reviewers to response (eg. one week at
>>> least, or more due to the holidays) before updating another
On 2021/12/29 15:27, Dave Young wrote:
> On 12/29/21 at 10:27am, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2021/12/29 0:13, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 09:26:01PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
Use parse_crashkernel_high_low() to bring the parsing of
"crashkernel=X,high"
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 06:38:43PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> I appreciate you further explanation below to describe the situation.
> I do not see how can I tell this to *all* submitters,
You don't have to - that was hypothetical. :-)
I'm typing this on a public mailing list with the hope that
On 12/29/21 at 11:03am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 03:27:48PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > So I think you can unify the parse_crashkernel* in x86 first with just
> > one function. And leave the further improvements to later work. But
> > let's see how Boris think about this.
On 12/29/21 at 11:11am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 03:45:12PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > BTW, I would suggest to wait for reviewers to response (eg. one week at
> > least, or more due to the holidays) before updating another version
> >
> > Do not worry to miss the 5.17.
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 03:45:12PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> BTW, I would suggest to wait for reviewers to response (eg. one week at
> least, or more due to the holidays) before updating another version
>
> Do not worry to miss the 5.17. I would say take it easy if it will
> miss then let's
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 03:27:48PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> So I think you can unify the parse_crashkernel* in x86 first with just
> one function. And leave the further improvements to later work. But
> let's see how Boris think about this.
Well, I think this all unnecessary work. Why?
If the
10 matches
Mail list logo
