Re: [PATCH] kexec: should use uchunk for user buffer increasing

2024-02-03 Thread Baoquan He
On 01/30/24 at 06:18pm, yang.zhang wrote: > From: "yang.zhang" > > Because of alignment requirement in kexec-tools, there is > no problem for user buffer increasing when loading segments. > But when coping, the step is uchunk, so we should use uchunk > not mchunk. In theory, ubytes is <=

Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Split crash out from kexec and clean up related config items

2024-02-03 Thread Baoquan He
On 02/02/24 at 10:53am, Hari Bathini wrote: > Hi Baoquan, > > On 19/01/24 8:22 pm, Baoquan He wrote: > > Motivation: > > = > > Previously, LKP reported a building error. When investigating, it can't > > be resolved reasonablly with the present messy kdump config items. > > > >