Le 26/06/2020 à 21:04, Hari Bathini a écrit :
Some of the kexec_file_load code isn't PPC64 specific. Move PPC64
specific code from kexec/file_load.c to kexec/file_load_64.c. Also,
rename purgatory/trampoline.S to purgatory/trampoline_64.S in the
same spirit.
At the time being,
Le 26/06/2020 à 21:04, Hari Bathini a écrit :
Some archs can have special memory regions, within the given memory
range, which can't be used for the buffer in a kexec segment. As
kexec_add_buffer() function is being called from generic code as well,
add weak arch_kexec_add_buffer definition
Rationale:
Reduces attack surface on kernel devs opening the links for MITM
as HTTPS traffic is much harder to manipulate.
Deterministic algorithm:
For each file:
If not .svg:
For each line:
If doesn't contain `\bxmlns\b`:
For each link, `\bhttp://[^# \t\r\n]*(?:\w|/)`:
MONEY-GRAM TRANSFERRED PAYMENT INFO:
Below is the sender’s information
1. MG. REFERENCE NO#: 36360857
2. SENDER'S NAME: Johnson Williams
3. AMOUNT TO PICKUP: US$10,000
Go to any Money Gram office near you and pick up the payment Track the
Reference Number by visiting and click the link
Hi Hari,
After a quick through for this series, I have a few question/comment on
this patch for the time being. Pls see comment inline.
On 06/27/2020 03:05 AM, Hari Bathini wrote:
> crashkernel region could have an overlap with special memory regions
> like opal, rtas, tce-table & such. These
When crashkernel is reserved above 4G in memory, kernel should
reserve some amount of low memory for swiotlb and some DMA buffers.
So there may be two crash kernel regions, one is below 4G, the other
is above 4G.
Currently, there is only one crash kernel region on arm64, and pass
On 6/26/20 3:39 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
Take the properties of the kexec kernel's inode and the current task
ownership into consideration when matching a KEXEC_CMDLINE operation to
the rules in the IMA policy. This allows for some uniformity when
writing IMA policy rules for KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK,
Hi Hari,
If in [4/11], get_exclude_memory_ranges() turns out to be unnecessary
,then this patch is abundant either. As my understanding, memblock has
already helped to achieved the purpose that get_exclude_memory_ranges()
wants.
Thanks,
Pingfan
On 06/27/2020 03:04 AM, Hari Bathini wrote:
>
