Re: [PATCH 00/17] Add kexec_file_load support to s390

2018-02-26 Thread Philipp Rudo
Hi Dave Hi AKASHI On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 10:21:02 +0900 AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > > > Arch code need arch maintainer to review, maybe either of you can send > > the common part first before the arch code, eg. AKASHI can split the common > > cleanup patches and post them as a separate series, aft

Re: [PATCH 00/17] Add kexec_file_load support to s390

2018-02-25 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 09:59:56AM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > On 02/23/18 at 11:01am, Philipp Rudo wrote: > > Hi Dave > > > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:34:05 +0800 > > Dave Young wrote: > > > > > On 02/14/18 at 10:54am, Philipp Rudo wrote: > > > > Hi Dave, > > > > > > > > I just browsed AKASHI's p

Re: [PATCH 00/17] Add kexec_file_load support to s390

2018-02-23 Thread Dave Young
On 02/23/18 at 11:01am, Philipp Rudo wrote: > Hi Dave > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:34:05 +0800 > Dave Young wrote: > > > On 02/14/18 at 10:54am, Philipp Rudo wrote: > > > Hi Dave, > > > > > > I just browsed AKASHI's patches (v7). The way I see it the common code > > > changes > > > are on differ

Re: [PATCH 00/17] Add kexec_file_load support to s390

2018-02-23 Thread Philipp Rudo
Hi Dave On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:34:05 +0800 Dave Young wrote: > On 02/14/18 at 10:54am, Philipp Rudo wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > > > I just browsed AKASHI's patches (v7). The way I see it the common code > > changes > > are on different areas of kexec_file and shouldn't get in conflict. Only in >

Re: [PATCH 00/17] Add kexec_file_load support to s390

2018-02-23 Thread Dave Young
On 02/14/18 at 10:54am, Philipp Rudo wrote: > Hi Dave, > > I just browsed AKASHI's patches (v7). The way I see it the common code changes > are on different areas of kexec_file and shouldn't get in conflict. Only in > the > arch code (s390 and arm64) some function calls might need an update. But

Re: [PATCH 00/17] Add kexec_file_load support to s390

2018-02-14 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
Hi, On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:54:49AM +0100, Philipp Rudo wrote: > Hi Dave, > > I just browsed AKASHI's patches (v7). The way I see it the common code changes > are on different areas of kexec_file and shouldn't get in conflict. Only in > the > arch code (s390 and arm64) some function calls mig

Re: [PATCH 00/17] Add kexec_file_load support to s390

2018-02-14 Thread Philipp Rudo
Hi Dave, I just browsed AKASHI's patches (v7). The way I see it the common code changes are on different areas of kexec_file and shouldn't get in conflict. Only in the arch code (s390 and arm64) some function calls might need an update. But I have to take a closer look on the patches first. @AKAS

Re: [PATCH 00/17] Add kexec_file_load support to s390

2018-02-13 Thread Dave Young
Hi Philipp, I added AKASHI in cc, he posted arm64 kexec_file series previously. I would like to read both series especially the general part, but maybe at the end of this month because of a holiday.. >From the patch log the cleanup looks nice, but still need read the details. On 02/12/18 at 11:0

[PATCH 00/17] Add kexec_file_load support to s390

2018-02-12 Thread Philipp Rudo
Hi everybody resending the series as there was no reaction, yet. Furthermore i was told that Andrew and the x86 list should also be CCed, so welcome. No changes made to the patches since first time i sent them. The patches apply to the current master (v4.16-rc1). Thanks Philipp --- this series

[PATCH 00/17] Add kexec_file_load support to s390

2018-02-02 Thread Philipp Rudo
Hi everybody this series adds the kexec_file_load system call to s390. Before the system call is added there are some preparations/clean ups to common kexec_file_load. In detail this series contains: Patch #1&2: Minor cleanups/fixes. Patch #3-9: Clean up the purgatory load/relocation code. Espec