[01:38] Um...so I connect the ends of the resistor to other
things by drawing a wire. Then I rotate the resistor. It now shows me the
resistor is not connected to the wires. I now generate a net list and the
net list has the resistor connected but the schematic doesn't show the
connections. Is tha
Wayne,
In 'C' long long's are 64-bit on 32-bit architectures; however,
and unfortunately, long long is only part of the 'C' standard
and not part of the 'C++' standard.
i.e. in stdint.h you find
typedef long long int64_t;
typedef unsinged long long u_int64_4;
but stdint.h is a 'C' header file
Hi-
This is some boost weirdness. Attached patch to fix.
Thanks-
-lajos
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Fabio Varesano
wrote:
> Compiler(gcc version 4.7.0 20120324) output:
>
>>
>> /home/fabio/Programs/kicad-arch/kicad-bzr/src/kicad/include/boost/polygon/polygon_90_set_data.hpp:
>> In instan
Compiler(gcc version 4.7.0 20120324) output:
/home/fabio/Programs/kicad-arch/kicad-bzr/src/kicad/include/boost/polygon/polygon_90_set_data.hpp:
In instantiation of ‘void boost::polygon::polygon_90_set_data::sort() const
[with T = int]’:
/home/fabio/Programs/kicad-arch/kicad-bzr/src/kicad/inclu
El 10/04/2012, a las 22:23, Dick Hollenbeck escribió:
> On 04/10/2012 12:12 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote:
>> Ok, ok, I add to my offer: transplanting the old wiki to the new one.
>>
>> :)
>
> I am not opposed to it, and would be willing to buy a domain name.
That would be great, I plann
On 4/10/2012 4:41 PM, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:
> Wayne,
>
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2012, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>>
>> On 64-bit builds, integers are 64 bits so it becomes meaningless at that
>> point. Even on 32 bit hardware, there are much more pressing issues
>> that need to be resolved.
>
> On 64-
Wayne,
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>
> On 64-bit builds, integers are 64 bits so it becomes meaningless at that
> point. Even on 32 bit hardware, there are much more pressing issues
> that need to be resolved.
On 64-bit architecture int's are 32-bits. long's are 64-bits.
--bri
On 04/10/2012 11:55 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> On 4/10/2012 11:40 AM, Brian Sidebotham wrote:
>> On 8 April 2012 13:14, Edwin van den Oetelaar
>> wrote:
>>> -- Forwarded message --
>>> From: Edwin van den Oetelaar
>>> Date: Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 12:28 PM
>>> Subject: remarks about
On 04/10/2012 12:12 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote:
> Ok, ok, I add to my offer: transplanting the old wiki to the new one.
>
> :)
I am not opposed to it, and would be willing to buy a domain name.
But am I correct in thinking this is just for the wiki?
The code stays in BZR at launchpad unde
Ok, ok, I add to my offer: transplanting the old wiki to the new one.
:)
2012/4/9 Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
> Yes, Altium makes extensive use of Confluence.
>
> I think this is where I got the idea for using Confluence + JIRA + etc...
> for my company :-) in
> first place.
>
> I think it could s
>
>
> > But +/- 2.15m is ~ 4.3m
> >
> > I don't see any point in changing anything that has already been done
> > in order to support a PCB larger than 4 metres. The patch would simply
> > be to move coordinates to a 64-bit int anyway, so it would not be too
> > difficult should someone come along
On 4/10/2012 11:40 AM, Brian Sidebotham wrote:
> On 8 April 2012 13:14, Edwin van den Oetelaar
> wrote:
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Edwin van den Oetelaar
>> Date: Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 12:28 PM
>> Subject: remarks about the internal nanometer resolution
>> To: KiCad Develop
On 4/10/2012 9:37 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> On 04/10/2012 08:34 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>> On 04/10/2012 07:14 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>>> On 4/10/2012 2:43 AM, jean-pierre charras wrote:
Le 10/04/2012 01:23, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
> On 4/9/2012 2:41 PM, jean-pierre charras wro
I updated this to support the PCBNEW nanometers.
Might have broken something on the non-nanometer build, did not test that.
Also, Jean-Pierre,
I think there is still some incompatibility in the zone hatches. There may be
too many of
them being constructed.
Might want to instrument the perim
On 8 April 2012 13:14, Edwin van den Oetelaar
wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Edwin van den Oetelaar
> Date: Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 12:28 PM
> Subject: remarks about the internal nanometer resolution
> To: KiCad Developers
>
>
> First of, I have not followed the discussion
Hi all,
maybe 2m could be an important limitation. What is the limitation of
using a 10 nm unit?
I think it is important to talk about it, especially now that somebody
has brought up an apparent limitation.
cheers
Fabrizio
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> On 04/08/2012
On 04/10/2012 08:58 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> On 04/09/2012 11:00 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> On 4/9/2012 11:18 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote:
>>> They seem to be using "wire" for schematics: and "wire" for pcb too.
>>>
>>> They also enumerate the layers at start.
>> Miguel,
>>
>> Thanks
On 04/10/2012 08:58 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> On 04/09/2012 11:00 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> On 4/9/2012 11:18 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote:
>>> They seem to be using "wire" for schematics: and "wire" for pcb too.
>>>
>>> They also enumerate the layers at start.
>> Miguel,
>>
>> Thanks
On 04/09/2012 11:00 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> On 4/9/2012 11:18 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote:
>> They seem to be using "wire" for schematics: and "wire" for pcb too.
>>
>> They also enumerate the layers at start.
> Miguel,
>
> Thanks for the eagle files. A layer map at the top of the fil
On 04/10/2012 08:34 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> On 04/10/2012 07:14 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> On 4/10/2012 2:43 AM, jean-pierre charras wrote:
>>> Le 10/04/2012 01:23, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
On 4/9/2012 2:41 PM, jean-pierre charras wrote:
> Le 09/04/2012 17:37, Wayne Stambaugh a éc
On 04/10/2012 07:14 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> On 4/10/2012 2:43 AM, jean-pierre charras wrote:
>> Le 10/04/2012 01:23, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
>>> On 4/9/2012 2:41 PM, jean-pierre charras wrote:
Le 09/04/2012 17:37, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
> On 4/9/2012 9:50 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrot
Am 10.04.2012 14:14, schrieb Wayne Stambaugh:
(tracks
(net 1
(track (xy 91.6686 85.4837) (xy 91.6686 81.8134) (width 0.6096)
(layer front))
(track (xy 91.6686 81.8134) (xy 101.6686 85.4837))
(via (xy 101.6686 85.4837) (size 1.6096) (layers back front))
)
(net 2
)
)
Any
On 4/10/2012 2:43 AM, jean-pierre charras wrote:
> Le 10/04/2012 01:23, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
>> On 4/9/2012 2:41 PM, jean-pierre charras wrote:
>>> Le 09/04/2012 17:37, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
On 4/9/2012 9:50 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>
> Wayne, regarding:
>
> DRAWSEGM
23 matches
Mail list logo
